It's a good thing we have many of us here who prevent this place from turning into fucking Facebook. Cause that's where **** like that spreads like wildfire.
Thank you for your service.
It's a good thing we have many of us here who prevent this place from turning into fucking Facebook. Cause that's where **** like that spreads like wildfire.
Admittedly an outlier hypothetical scenario but ... say you have the unicorn --> unique skills, only one potential employer in country. (I'm trying to get the "get different job" retort out of play for a hypothetical; please bear with me.)
Coerced by employer to take. Take or don't have income. Get shot and immediately go into anaphylaxis. Death ensues. Family calls attorney. <-- That yes, admittedly unicorn, scenario could make corporate lawyers take pause.
"We strongly encourage, and if you don't it's mask and test weekly" is non-invasive. "You must" is invasive. I'm pretty sure which path the corporate lawyers would rather defend.
Sure. Just go ahead and mislead everyone.
OK but are there reports of people dying as a result of the vaccine? Or even severe side effects linked to it?
Anaphylactic reactions can occur with any vaccine, but are usually extremely rare—about one per 1 million doses.
I have a friend who is a physician with the Mayo Clinic, and we were talking about this on Monday. He said that more than 20% of the employees in their system have refused the vaccine. It's the Mayo farking Clinic.
But, he expects that may change. Mayo just implemented a new rule. No vaccine, no eligibility for their disability plans if the employee is off work due to Covid. Extend that to general health coverage and they may be on to something.
I started that post with "Good/Bad". Yes, I led with caveat emptor. I led with "unreviewed work by Carnegie Mellon and U of Pittsburgh".
I'm sorry that misled you.
However, anaphylactic reactions do not mean death follows. (Possible, but definitely not probable.)
Science article from January.
https://www.sciencemag.org/news/202...id-19-vaccine-trigger-rare-allergic-reactions
Lawyers manage risk. Why some companies mandate and others do not more than likely involves the perceived risks through the eyes of corporate counsel.
Maybe it would be best not to post non-reviewed data.
Maybe it would be best not to post non-reviewed data.
But then how would he be able to play "gotcha"?
Do you know what separates a college from a business?
I thought this sophisticated group would understand "not reviewed" and as I also said take the Carnegie/UPitt data "with a grain of salt".
I have a friend who is a physician with the Mayo Clinic, and we were talking about this on Monday. He said that more than 20% of the employees in their system have refused the vaccine. It's the Mayo farking Clinic.
But, he expects that may change. Mayo just implemented a new rule. No vaccine, no eligibility for their disability plans if the employee is off work due to Covid. Extend that to general health coverage and they may be on to something.
Did he or she say whether the employees were medical professionals, Hovey, or did they include housekeeping, dietary, CNAs, etc? If so, the number means much less, IMO. On the other hand, if it includes docs, nurses, NPs, PAs,etc., it would be interesting to know some of the "why."
Well she was right she had nothing to fear from the virus.
How many more of these until we notice the uptick in national IQ? 2 million? 4?
The number of motorcyclists killed in Sturgis every year, or on the way to or from Sturgis, is pretty crazy.
On the other hand, given that they are driving motorcycles, probably not.
The number of motorcyclists killed in Sturgis every year, or on the way to or from Sturgis, is pretty crazy.
On the other hand, given that they are driving motorcycles, probably not.
If we follow the UK pattern, what comes after Covid Delta variant?
RSV. <-- Not good.
This source, while not NYT or WaPo or CNN, has an impressive list of sponsors/contributors (scroll to bottom).