Which is why you don't leave it up to the states...if we had a semi functional Federal Government we would be way ahead of where we are.
Don't we leave flu vaccinations up to the states?
Which is why you don't leave it up to the states...if we had a semi functional Federal Government we would be way ahead of where we are.
Which is why you don't leave it up to the states...if we had a semi functional Federal Government we would be way ahead of where we are.
Don't we leave flu vaccinations up to the states?
Anecdote alert: our South African au pair has had 2 family members (her aunt, age 45, and her grandmother, age 65) pass away within the last 6 days. Several other family members, neighbors, and friends positive and symptomatic - it is spreading fast.I'm reading an article from CNBC citing the British Health Minister saying that the South African variant is much more worrisome than the UK variant... My crude understanding is that the spike protein has some changes to it in the SA variant that the UK one doesn't. So there are more questions about the vaccine's effectiveness about the SA variant.
Over the noon hour I saw an interview with the Governor of West Virginia. I believe they have everyone in their nursing homes vaccinated, and I think they have their healthcare workers vaccinated. He said that they're starting on everyone 80 and above. When they run out of those people, they're going 70 and above, and then 60 and above, and so on. As he pointed out, it's not exactly rocket science. Get it into the arms of the aged and everything takes care of itself.
Don't we leave flu vaccinations up to the states?
Don't we leave flu vaccinations up to the states?
I think many states are over-thinking distribution. They are too worried that someone "more deserving" might get vaccinated after someone "less deserving" that they overly complicate the prioritization and end up delaying the vaccination of the vulnerable even more than if they just did something super simple that was primarily based on age. Basically what the UK did was prioritize healthcare workers and elderly.
I've been told by someone involved in the vaccination program administration in a hospital that the Feds don't want them holding onto doses. Use all the doses you get, don't hold half in a freezer for the second dose.
Well that is fine for WV (and he is 100% correct) but that is easier to do there than say...California, TX or NY wouldn't you say? There is some rather obvious differences.
Again, if actual people with knowledge of this stuff were in charge on the federal level things would be better off. Make the decisions at the highest level and get things going. Take the decision making out of the hands from the people who are apparently overthinking everything. Not to mention it will offset the "it isnt real" rhetoric if it comes from the people they trust. (i.e. Trump and Trumpers)
Sure there is going to be a difference between the states. But wouldn't you agree that the states that should be most equipped to handle this without federal hand-holding should be states like NY and California?
Depends.
How strapped has this pandemic already made them, with no help coming from the feds to offset?
If the flu was killing 350,000 people/year we wouldn't be.
California is the 5th largest economy in the world. If they're too poor to do this, we need to just call it a day.
Sure there is going to be a difference between the states. But wouldn't you agree that the states that should be most equipped to handle this without federal hand-holding should be states like NY and California?
What's beautiful is that he's also threatening to fine hospitals $100,000 for not vaccinating people fast enough.Also, I see Cuomo doing his usual Try-To-Fix-Something-But-End-Up-Making-It-Worse routine...
Covid vaccine: NY Gov. Cuomo to propose law making it a crime to skip line (cnbc.com)
Again, this is dumb. If someone is lucky enough to be at the "vaccine counter" when they're going to have to throw some away if they don't get it in an arm, so be it. Spend less time worrying about that, more time worrying about organizing this initial push. If you find someone jumping because they paid money or used their status or fame, fine, prosecute them. But if Joe Blow happens to get it because a pharmacist or nurse is going to have to discard it, that's not a crime.
Not according to the CDC- https://www.cdc.gov/flu/prevent/vaxsupply.htm
It's privately coordinated with general oversight from the CDC.
Given that existing structure, it makes no sense at all to let the states do the work. It's just not something they are skilled at. But given the "leadership" from the CDC's overall boss, it's no shock at all that a brand new way to distribute something that we do every single year in a different form be tried.
As wT pointed out, flu vaccines are rolled out at almost 20M per week nationwide with the current structure. And I've never seen a line at the pharmacies who administer it. 20M/week would cover the US in just over 16 weeks, and that's not a strain on any distribution system.
Sure there is going to be a difference between the states. But wouldn't you agree that the states that should be most equipped to handle this without federal hand-holding should be states like NY and California?