What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

Worthless Offseason Poll #5: Who Pays?

Worthless Offseason Poll #5: Who Pays?

  • Split the cost when the relationship is long-term

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Women pay until the relationship is long-term

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    17

The Rube

Retired Due To User Interface
No, this isn't about Ilya Kovalchuk.

Dating/relationships. Men(dot)com had their survey and this stat kinda stuck out to me. No, I am not a regular reader, I picked it up via Yahoo headlines.

Despite all this (my insert, paraphrased: "women are more comfortable than men in a relationship where their partner is making more money"), 4 out of 5 men still believe that they should pay for all dates, for the duration of the relationship or at least until it’s established. On the other hand, less than 25% of women said that their partner should always pick up the bill.


What say you?
 
Re: Worthless Offseason Poll #5: Who Pays?

Interesting to see if we get more than 3 responses. I've always been of the belief that things should be shared. If one person has more money at one point and wants to pay more, that's fine. But overall, expenses should be shared.
 
Re: Worthless Offseason Poll #5: Who Pays?

I'd go for a hybrid of a few of these answers. I think a guy should generally pick up the check for the first couple of dates (especially bearing in mind that first dates these days, at least where I live, tend to be a couple of drinks or a coffee rather than something more elaborate), but a woman should start chipping in before it gets to the "long-term" point. It's not 1950, the vast majority of single women work and I think dating practices should and do generally tend to reflect that. Speaking in maybe an over-generalization, women who refuse to pay for anything are either old-fashioned ("this is the way gender roles work") or arrogant ("you're lucky that I even agreed to go out with you, it's your responsibility to make this worth my while") or dinner whores ("I'm not interested, I'm just here for the free meal"). Obviously, as bostonewe points out, exceptions can be made where there's a significant disparity in income; if a Goldman Sachs I-banker is dating a graduate student, the banker should be picking up the majority of the checks (regardless of which person is which gender).

Going a little further, in that kind of situation I think it's appropriate for the person with less money not to push for expensive activities that the person with more money will wind up paying for; that starts to edge back into dinner whore/sugar baby territory. (Until the LTR phase, anyway.)
 
Re: Worthless Offseason Poll #5: Who Pays?

I'd go for a hybrid of a few of these answers. I think a guy should generally pick up the check for the first couple of dates (especially bearing in mind that first dates these days, at least where I live, tend to be a couple of drinks or a coffee rather than something more elaborate), but a woman should start chipping in before it gets to the "long-term" point. It's not 1950, the vast majority of single women work and I think dating practices should and do generally tend to reflect that. Speaking in maybe an over-generalization, women who refuse to pay for anything are either old-fashioned ("this is the way gender roles work") or arrogant ("you're lucky that I even agreed to go out with you, it's your responsibility to make this worth my while") or dinner whores ("I'm not interested, I'm just here for the free meal"). Obviously, as bostonewe points out, exceptions can be made where there's a significant disparity in income; if a Goldman Sachs I-banker is dating a graduate student, the banker should be picking up the majority of the checks (regardless of which person is which gender).

Going a little further, in that kind of situation I think it's appropriate for the person with less money not to push for expensive activities that the person with more money will wind up paying for; that starts to edge back into dinner whore/sugar baby territory. (Until the LTR phase, anyway.)
This.

I will add that if the girl asks the guy out, she should expect to pay for the date.
 
Back
Top