…man…Graham Mertz is the most overrated recruit in the history of badger sports.
also, give the HC to Leonard and send Chryst and Rudolph packing.
Stole this from the offseason thread....
"Initial power play groups according to Milewski:
Achan-Caufield-Stange-DSP-Ceulemans
Bantle-Baker-R Donovan-Malmquist-Ess/Kehrer"
I'm little shocked to see Donovan and even Baker on the PP. Would like to see Gorniak on the PP. I have big expectations for Malmquist for this season. He's a very experienced Fr.
Not to get off topic of hockey, but I'd like to comment, we're all buds anyway. Graham looked fantastic in the Sr bowl thing he played in. He looked insanely amazing against IL. As the season went on, he played worse and worse. His confidence was destroyed. It's still shot. I think he has all the tools to be as great as he has shown he can be, but the coaching staff needs to figure out how to get him to stick in the pocket, trust the O line and make quick reads and throw with confidence. I listened to the game on the radio and the UW's guys were amazed how much poise the ND 3rd stringer had in the pocket while Mertz had zero poise. I HATE how they are rotating 8 linemen in and out. Pick 5 and ride them. I think their confidence is damaged as well, just like yanking a goalie all the time. I think the way Chryst is managing the O he is destroying them. It's a mega trainwreck. I'm not ready to fire Chryst yet, but the team MUST play better and show progress. Today was a totally winnable game and they blew it.
Surprised Johnson isn't on one of the units. Am I missing something there? Eliteprospects has him at 143 games played and 122 points over 4 seasons at Bowling Green.
Ranked 11 in the preseason poll. That is much to high in my opinion.
https://madison.com/wsj/sports/coll...cle_6f4802b3-8f7a-5e2f-9707-bc53d73a8827.html
Yeah that is nuts. It just shows the preseason pollsters do absolutely no homework prior to filling out the ballot. Really sad that they don't take their job seriously. Maybe rank them 18ish?
I guess it’s a good thing our starter’s GAA last year was 2.05. Bodes well for this year. Has there been a Granato coached team that has averaged under 3 goals for per game? I don’t think goal scoring will be an issue. It wasn’t an issue before Caufield/Holloway. Shouldn’t be an issue if the system works. The trouble was always keeping the puck out of the net off of defensive breakdowns and that was mostly negated when Kalynuk and Miller turned pro.Don't want to be called a negative nancy, but I think 18 is optimistic. I suspect if the other team scores 3 goals we will lose. So if we don't put D first, it will be a tough year. We hear all the right things from Granato, but until I see it on the ice, I will remain a skeptic.
I guess it’s a good thing our starter’s GAA last year was 2.05. Bodes well for this year. Has there been a Granato coached team that has averaged under 3 goals for per game? I don’t think goal scoring will be an issue. It wasn’t an issue before Caufield/Holloway. Shouldn’t be an issue if the system works. The trouble was always keeping the puck out of the net off of defensive breakdowns and that was mostly negated when Kalynuk and Miller turned pro.
You are right never under 3. But there is a big issue when you score over 3, but allow more per game in GA......
16-17 3.38 GAA 3.28 20-15-1
17-18 3.11 GAA 3.35 14-19-4
18-19 3.05 GAA 3.51 14-18-5
19-20 3.08 GAA 3.75 14-20-2
20-21 3.81 GAA 2.58 20-10-1
Tony Granato total record 82-82-13
Looking at these stats, there is one outlier, last year with the super star offense. All gone. I suspect regression to the mean which means it will be more like 18-19 or 19-20, unless as Tony has been touting, they actually become defense first. I am not holding my breath.
Your are fine with a .500 coach and nothing to worry about right?
....
As for your last comment, I'm cool with seeing how the season goes before whining about the coaching staff that just came off their best year.
The outlier from my perspective is last year was the only year where the team averaged less than 3 goals against per game. But again, I attribute the horrible defense to Kalynuk and Miller for the prior years.
I'm not worried about having stellar defense this year with the return of Inamoto, Kehrer, Ess, Peltonen, Vorlicky, and Rowe. Those guys might not be fantastic offensively, but they can hold down the defensive fort. There is ZERO chance they put up the defensive numbers of the 18-19 or 19-20 teams.
And if you take off your badger colored sunglasses, they under-peformed last year when it counted.....Best year under Granato, yes, but that's easy based on previous 4 years. I think a .500 record will be about where they land. And no NCAA playoff for 5 of 6 years. Unacceptable. I hope I am wrong about my pessimism and hope you are right (and I'll be willing to admit I was wrong). I just don't see it. I'll be there next Friday to see how the team looks!
I'm 100% on board with this.
They will score goals. MdSP lead the USHL in scoring on 19-20 (30g 30a in 49 games). We won't be playing behind all the guys that left anymore. Max Johnson has 122 pts in 143 college games. Bantle was 12th in the USHL in scoring in 19-20 (20g 19a) and he has a year of college under his belt already. I think the key is for Lindmark and Gorniak to step up into being major contributors and for Caulfield and Ahcan to keep it rolling.
Ceulemans on the PP is a big weapon too. It will take some of the sting away from loosing all the PP talent, which in retrospect was a crazy amount of talent on the ice at one time.
In the end we all want to see a great season, that's Watts counts.
Nice to see the women's team off to a good start!