Miller moving on would seem to be addition by subtraction. Spending some time in the AHL would be a good move for him at this point.
We need some positive news.
Define positive. Unless any coaching changes happen there's little reason for hope/positivity.
What I'm wondering more is if rather than a coaching change happening ---> will the coaches change?
Here's (obviously) the single most significant stat:
'17 3.28ga (46th) 20-15-1
'18 3.35ga (49th) 14-19-4
'19 3.51ga (53rd) 14-18-5
'20 3.75ga (57th) 14-20-2
Hmmm...
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Per college hockey sources, expect an announcement in the next week or so that Vermont and associate head coach Kevin Patrick are mutually parting ways. Assistant coach Jeff Hill (UVM alum) will stay on to help in transition with possibility of being retained by new head coach.</p>— Jeff Cox (@JeffCoxSports) <a href="https://twitter.com/JeffCoxSports/status/1237100679891767296?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 9, 2020</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
They’re getting the band back together!
*Howie knocks on Brad Winchester’s door*
You might be right, but one would think that given the "this is the year" nature of this season, the staff would be seriously questioning what they did or what went wrong. Post season SOP is pretty much tear everything you do down and look at it under a microscope. Will they do that and will that process produce changes in the system they want to play? The way they coach it? Anything?
I don't think Oz or Tony or Mark suddenly forgot how to play or coach hockey, (Eaves didn't suddenly "forget" either, that wasn't it. ) nor do I think any of them are dumb. They're pretty smart guys. The question is what are they doing now, why are they doing it, and why isn't it producing results?
Here's (obviously) the single most significant stat:
'17 3.28ga (46th) 20-15-1
'18 3.35ga (49th) 14-19-4
'19 3.51ga (53rd) 14-18-5
'20 3.75ga (57th) 14-20-2
Taking the top 14 PWR this year and all the at-large teams the preceding 3 years, only 2 teams (out of 56) had GAA over 3.00. In '18 MI @ 3.02gaa and PSU @ 3.06gaa. That's it. And only a couple of more teams were even over 2.5gaa.
Given that, it seems pretty clear that you can't just depend on outscoring teams as an overall strategy and expect positive results. It's too hard to do consistently and it's especially too hard in the B1G. (not to mention playing the #1 SOS in the country.)
And it is very clearly not just goaltending.
So I'm interested to see what, if anything they will look to do, systems wise and otherwise. Or if they'll just chalk it up to youth and keep plowing forward. (4.00 gaa here we come!)
What I'm wondering more is if rather than a coaching change happening ---> will the coaches change?
Wisko I think in addition to very good points I agree with here. I think with the facilities and everything these kids have they lose sight emotionally of why they are here. Mike Eaves lost his way but he was tough on the players and they got whatever message he was giving. He was tough. Real consequences for poor play are needed. Years ago I went to Cap Ice in Middleton before an NCAA game to watch a Badgers practice, before 06. He got mad at the players and was screaming expletives you would not believe. Two years later they won it. Tony has to be too soft and Mark maybe. I cant see OZ that way.
This is the kind of stuff that needs to be taken to those fan relation meetings. With numbers like this that clearly show that what they have been doing isn't working, what are they going to do to correct matters? The shocking absence of a goaltending coach is certainly not helping matters either.
Again, I don't blame the goalies entirely for this drop off. If your defensive system (and how they players play) causes tons of chances to be sent your way, you will start taking on bad habits to compensate and those get exposed over time.
Something definitely needs to change and/or heads should roll.