Looking to the future, will the UCHC lose the bid when the MAC splits off?
https://twitter.com/d3hkybiggsy/status/1012763471396638720?s=21
The UCHC finally gets the autobid to take effect this season.
Hallelujah!
With Wilkes and Anna Maria beginning play this year the tourney bid ratio is up to 12.77 from 12.46.
I believe there was precedence that the women's tourney added another bid once the bid ratio went above half.
Could the men get the same or are we waiting for 2 more teams (AMC in '19 and ??? after that) to get that 13th bid.
Pool B is dead
AQs
East: CCC, MASCAC, NEHC, NESCAC, SUNYAC, UCHC
West: MIAC, NCHA
Pool C: 4 teams including WIAC
I admit that I say this out of complete ignorance since I don't know much of either school, but Anna Maria seems like it is cut from the same cloth of the now-defunct Mt. Ida. What are the chances that AMC's fate is the same?
I admit that I say this out of complete ignorance since I don't know much of either school, but Anna Maria seems like it is cut from the same cloth of the now-defunct Mt. Ida. What are the chances that AMC's fate is the same?
I was formerly under the mistaken impression that an autobid would somehow help the recruitment efforts of the league's member schools, but the success of the WIAC shot that theory all to he11 and back.
Fish ... will this decision mitigate (a tad) your disdain for the selection process?
They just added 25 tuition paying men. Figure $25,000 cost to attend for each student, that's added $625K to the school's coffers, less the cost of running the hockey team. Add in other males who may attend, but not make the team, the school probably added $$ to the bottom line.
Fish ... will this decision mitigate (a tad) your disdain for the selection process?
Not much. The system is fundamentally flawed whether the UCHC gets a gift bid or not.
Nothing new from me here; I would eliminate AQ's completely and select on the basis of a sound metric, and if forced to award AQ's I would select the RS winner. Same old.
The UCHC was a fairly lousy conference last year. Only Utica had any sort of an argument for NCAA inclusion. Had it been eligible for an AQ, and had anyone but UC won the conference tournament, the UCHC would have been represented by a team that had no business whatsoever garnering a berth. The field is just too small for this situation to exist, IMO.
So ... a tad?