Harvard appears to have a nice group.which teams have the best recruits for next season?
I'm going to throw out North Dakota and Minnesota as classes with some good potential. Potential for fairly immediate big roles with the combo of graduation and the Olympic year factors. Though not specified in the commitment thread Wolfe for Minnesota, as well as Menke and Hirschy for North Dakota have some USA U18 credentials I believe. Not sure...I think Tapani is in this class too for No Dak? It'll be interesting to watch how these programs endure the loss to graduation of strong leaders and prime contributors to success as well as potential loss of services of other impact players to Olympic teams. Big opportunities for the freshmen.
That's interesting, in Canada I think the consensus is the 90-92 birth years were the strongest, and the talent coming up is dwindling.
Assuming that is true, are there any theories as to why? Are numbers down in terms of participation?Completely agree, in Canada the group of 1996's that are are entering their senior High School years in September are not nearly as strong as the 1995's and 1994's.
Assuming that is true, are there any theories as to why? Are numbers down in terms of participation?
In recent years, it does seem that the Bulldogs perform best in years when little is expected of them. That should be true in 2013-14, because that had to be the least-talented UMD team I've ever seen. The incoming class looks good, but upgrades are definitely in order.In response to your test poll, could the answer be the team that you left off the list?
That's interesting, in Canada I think the consensus is the 90-92 birth years were the strongest, and the talent coming up is dwindling.
Assuming that is true, are there any theories as to why? Are numbers down in terms of participation?
I wonder if there was an economy effect with 2008 markets in both the US and Canada?
That was the so called Boom-Echo.
The phenomina in Canada has more to do with a dwindling supply pool at the grass roots levels. This is partly driven by lower birth rates in Canada in the late 90's and early 2000's. The Birth rates (per 1000 inhabitants) in Canada peaked in the late 80's and early 90's. That was the so called Boom-Echo. Then Birth Rates per 1000 steadily declined, hitting an all time post war (WW2) low around 2003-2005. Since then the rates have increased a bit. The birth rate decline was offset somewhat by higher and more relaxed immigration policies, but that segment of the population is typically into soccer rather than the more expensive hockey programs. Suspect that economic factors and the high cost to play the game at an elite level are also factors in declining enrollment numbers.
The school system has been trying to manage the lower birth rate issues for years in their planning cycles. Lower enrollment in elementary schools is creeping into high schools and a lot of teachers have trouble finding full time work. There is more supply than demand in that employment sector.
The affect of dwindling birth rates can be seen clearly in the OWHA (Ontario) registration numbers. There was a clear bubble in numbers for the 90-92 years followed by a flat line and then decline in the subsequent years. This is now starting to show up at the Midget age levels.
This is just a question to understand your context. Are you saying that those two will likely wind up in the top 5 or 10 nationally for all rookies next season?I think you have to give North Dakota a little more consideration. This is shaping up to be a really nice class. You have two top 10 (maybe top 5) scorers in Menke and Tapanni...
This is just a question to understand your context. Are you saying that those two will likely wind up in the top 5 or 10 nationally for all rookies next season?
I like Cameranesi for Minnesota better, but her chances of cracking the lineup is probably more difficult given their talent level.
Given her talent level I don't think Cameranesi will have a problem cracking the lineup.