RIT Regional - 2nd Round - (3) Northern Lite v. (6) 93Greatlaker

[XYZ]

?

 

[93GreatLaker]

Re: RIT Regional - 2nd Round - (3) Northern Lite v. (6) 93Greatlaker

For something that is supposed to be for fun, this is pretty lame. I go from up 1 to down 6 in a span of a few hours, hmmm. Chicago politics at its best Oh well, maybe next year. Best of luck to you Lite!

Guys (and girls), if you wish:

Northern Lite could really use our votes

And I'm sure bayliner2255 would appreciate our help as well

These two are friends of mine and I wouldn't mind getting them both into the next round. This is just for fun, but all the same, thank you for your consideration.

 

[Hammer]

Re: RIT Regional - 2nd Round - (3) Northern Lite v. (6) 93Greatlaker

Get over it.

 

[93GreatLaker]

Re: RIT Regional - 2nd Round - (3) Northern Lite v. (6) 93Greatlaker

Get over it.

I'm over it. Thanks for caring.

 

[Hammer]

Re: RIT Regional - 2nd Round - (3) Northern Lite v. (6) 93Greatlaker

Good. Now you get to sit back and watch me get torched when my game comes up.

 

[93GreatLaker]

Re: RIT Regional - 2nd Round - (3) Northern Lite v. (6) 93Greatlaker

Good. Now you get to sit back and watch me get torched when my game comes up.

 

[XYZ]

Re: RIT Regional - 2nd Round - (3) Northern Lite v. (6) 93Greatlaker

Don't feel so bad. The sort of people who live in that thread in the Cafe aren't the type of people you want votes from anyway.

If someone wants to lobby for votes, so be it. Disappointing, but so be it. It's just too bad that people are voting who have no knowledge or interest at all in DIII hockey, which our collective interest of is really what this should all be about.

Ideally.

 

[Hammer]

Re: RIT Regional - 2nd Round - (3) Northern Lite v. (6) 93Greatlaker

Do I regret doing it? No. I don't mind helping a couple of friends out. Look at it this way: I didn't start a new thread asking for votes for myself.

Would I do such a thing for myself? Absolutely not. Look, I know I'm pretty visible around here, and that my day is coming, and coming pretty soon, if I had to guess.

Also keep in mind that the vote totals here are not out of line with other contests. It's not like I dragged 20 people over here.

 

[bigmrg74]

Re: RIT Regional - 2nd Round - (3) Northern Lite v. (6) 93Greatlaker

Don't feel so bad. The sort of people who live in that thread in the Cafe aren't the type of people you want votes from anyway.

If someone wants to lobby for votes, so be it. Disappointing, but so be it. It's just too bad that people are voting who have no knowledge or interest at all in DIII hockey, which our collective interest of is really what this should all be about.

Ideally.

Cripes man, I thought this was nothing more than just something to pass the time around here until Hockey starts up again.

 

[Wormser-PointRC]

Re: RIT Regional - 2nd Round - (3) Northern Lite v. (6) 93Greatlaker

Also keep in mind that the vote totals here are not out of line with other contests. It's not like I dragged 20 people over here.

As of right now, there are 54 votes in this matchup. Meanwhile the Norm/Jabber match has 36. The Remy/mnhockey match has 34.

 

[Hammer]

Re: RIT Regional - 2nd Round - (3) Northern Lite v. (6) 93Greatlaker

I had 54 in mine, too, and if you'll review the tape, I had nothing to do with that, either.

EDIT: There were 4 games in the 1st round that went over 50, plus 2 more that had 49. That is also not including the only OT game of the 1st round, too.

 

[XYZ]

Re: RIT Regional - 2nd Round - (3) Northern Lite v. (6) 93Greatlaker

Cripes man, I thought this was nothing more than just something to pass the time around here until Hockey starts up again.

Yeah, I'm with you on that, which why you certainly must understand my amusement that a bunch of abject losers from the Cafe are voting in a poll in which they wouldn't know what a NorthernLite or 93Greatlaker was if it bit them on the ***.

You're an idiot. Shut up and go join the rest of your Cafe brethren.

 

[hockeyplayer1015]

Re: RIT Regional - 2nd Round - (3) Northern Lite v. (6) 93Greatlaker

Yeah, I'm with you on that, which why you certainly must understand my amusement that a bunch of abject losers from the Cafe are voting in a poll in which they wouldn't know what a NorthernLite or 93Greatlaker was if it bit them on the ***.

You're an idiot. Shut up and go join the rest of your Cafe brethren.

[sizes up the size of my e-peen to the rest of the internet persona heroes in here]

nope, still not up to the task, gotta go back and inflate my ego some more with silly poles that still mean nothing

 

[XYZ]

Re: RIT Regional - 2nd Round - (3) Northern Lite v. (6) 93Greatlaker

[sizes up the size of my e-peen to the rest of the internet persona heroes in here]

nope, still not up to the task, gotta go back and inflate my ego some more with silly poles that still mean nothing

I see you must have taken a break from stalking Red Cloud. Keep up the good work!

Funny you mention personas, considering everyone and their brother here knows who I am. Perhaps if you actually followed DIII you'd be aware of such things.

 

[joeyc3402]

Re: RIT Regional - 2nd Round - (3) Northern Lite v. (6) 93Greatlaker

Can we just leave the Cafe stuff off the D-III board, and just let D-III folks be D-III folks?

 

[Hammer]

Re: RIT Regional - 2nd Round - (3) Northern Lite v. (6) 93Greatlaker

We probably should. I've made enough of a mess here.

 

[zamboney]

Re: RIT Regional - 2nd Round - (3) Northern Lite v. (6) 93Greatlaker

As a Guru once said

Sorry to whore myself out like that for a vote, but in the end...
IT WAS WORTH IT.

 

[hockeyplayer1015]

Re: RIT Regional - 2nd Round - (3) Northern Lite v. (6) 93Greatlaker

I see you must have taken a break from stalking Red Cloud. Keep up the good work!

Funny you mention personas, considering everyone and their brother here knows who I am. Perhaps if you actually followed DIII you'd be aware of such things.

Well, I suppose you would be right... that is, if by stalking you meant disagreements leading to attacks on his part, which led to counter-attacks. Right, wrong or indifferent, there was no stalking involved, but you can use your second guess for double or nothing if you wish.

 

[bigmrg74]

Re: RIT Regional - 2nd Round - (3) Northern Lite v. (6) 93Greatlaker

Yeah, I'm with you on that, which why you certainly must understand my amusement that a bunch of abject losers from the Cafe are voting in a poll in which they wouldn't know what a NorthernLite or 93Greatlaker was if it bit them on the ***.

You're an idiot. Shut up and go join the rest of your Cafe brethren.

Ohh... I got called an Idiot online. Ouch, that really hurt my feelings there XYZ. Now if you'll all excuse me, I'm going to have to go draw myself a bubble bath, put on som Kenny G, have a glass or two of wine and then have myself a good cry about it.




Not the first time I've been called an idiot, and its likely not going to be my last. Lighten Up Francis!!!

 

[XYZ]

Re: RIT Regional - 2nd Round - (3) Northern Lite v. (6) 93Greatlaker

Ohh... I got called an Idiot online. Ouch, that really hurt my feelings there XYZ. Now if you'll all excuse me, I'm going to have to go draw myself a bubble bath, put on som Kenny G, have a glass or two of wine and then have myself a good cry about it.

At least you've upgraded from the Barnyard See 'n Say.