What about the 17th permutation, that granddaddyscout wins a last-minute change of heart from the NCAA committee which then issues a fiat cancelling the quarterfinals (and thereby saving even more $$$$), pitting Minny and UMD in a Frozen Three semi and awarding Wisco a bye?
Well I am willing to bet one of those three teams wins it all, how confident are you that one of the other 5 will. This may be the strongest WCHA field ever and it seems clear something was done to guard against a WCHA Championship match up. So how much are you willing to wager
Wisconsin, Cornell, BU, BC
1 1.79%
1. WFR
Cornell - 49 = 88%
Dartmouth - 7 = 12%
Out of 56 voters, the vote totals are:
Wisconsin - 51 = 91%
UMD - 5 = 9%
Cornell - 49 = 88%
Dartmouth - 7 = 12%
BU - 16 = 29%
Mercyhurst - 40 = 71%
BC - 9 = 16%
Minnesota - 47 = 84%
I don't anticipate any of these being as one-sided as the vote totals. E.g., Mercyhurst is usually good for a one-goal game if not OT.
Oh please.Exact same ratio as the final score. Looks like we have some vision as a group.
On the other side of the equation many had little faith in the Beantown teams.
After all the moaning and groaning about the seeding, at the end of the day the NCAA Seeding Committee batted 100%, while we as a group only batted 1.79%. Maybe that is why we are fans and not on the comittee. .
I'd say that through most of the season, once it became apparent that Wisconsin and Boston College had bounced back from subpar seasons, everyone recognized that there were 7 top teams with a drop to the 8th team. Exactly where the subgroupings were in those 7 seemed to change during the course of the season, and we are still trying to figure that out exactly. The results of three games yesterday seem to support that view; the one outlier is a BC/Minnesota game that wasn't as close as the score. Partly, I think the computers were a little kind to Minnesota, and they really belonged toward the bottom of the 7, not the middle. Yes, they could play with Wisconsin at times, but partly that's because Wisconsin tends to be a little inconsistent themselves, but the Gophers overall were probably closer to North Dakota than they were to the Badgers.All we can conclude from Saturday's results is that Minnesota underperformed. Everyone but the criteria considered them to have had the third-best regular season in the country. It doesn't imply that the criteria was somehow wiser than the human poll voters and the krach and rutter rankings.
Congrats to the one forum visionary.
Oh please.