What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

Possible Good New for RIT Women

joecct

Well-known member
Should be news, but the s stuck

From the NCAA 7/5/11 News of the Day

Multidivisional classification

The Administration Cabinet also reviewed ramifications of the new Division I membership standards adopted in April (Proposal No. 2010-100) that eliminates multidivisional membership. The 45 current non-Division I schools that had been using multidivisional classification (28 of them have one sport in Division I, and 17 have two, one in each gender) were grandfathered under the new proposal.

With that in mind, cabinet members are asking the Division I Leadership Council to consider sponsoring legislation to permit (not require) those current non-Division I institutions with a sport classified in Division I for only one gender to seek reclassification of one Division I sport of the opposite gender.

The cabinet directed staff to develop information to help the Leadership Council review the issue.
 
Re: Possible Good New for RIT Women

I thought RIT going D1 was just an unfounded rumor?
Right now, yes as the 2010-100 prohibits new playups. But if the NCAA passes new legislation as indicated below, then RIT (and CC) could move up to play D-I womens hockey.

NOTE: This would also affect D-II schools, but since the women play a D-I/II NCC, why move up?
 
Re: Possible Good New for RIT Women

Right now, yes as the 2010-100 prohibits new playups. But if the NCAA passes new legislation as indicated below, then RIT (and CC) could move up to play D-I womens hockey.

NOTE: This would also affect D-II schools, but since the women play a D-I/II NCC, why move up?


Because they do not qualify for the NCAA'S might be a reason.
 
Re: Possible Good New for RIT Women

I thought RIT going D1 was just an unfounded rumor?

RIT's intention to apply for DI status for the women's program was confirmed by the college president at the same time they announced the plans for the new arena. They have been quietly preparing for this for some time.
 
Re: Possible Good New for RIT Women

The bottom line question is the timeline. My impression from conversations with Tiger faithful (who clearly would know) during the finals in Rochester was that this was not happening any time real soon. Ground being broken for the new arena seemed a key element in the process. Has that taken place? It sounded like there were at least a couple of tens of millions to be raised. Have those donations been flooding in? The NC$$ typically moves at what might be described as a glacial pace. Does the recent NC$$ announcement change that?
 
Re: Possible Good New for RIT Women

The bottom line question is the timeline. My impression from conversations with Tiger faithful (who clearly would know) during the finals in Rochester was that this was not happening any time real soon. Ground being broken for the new arena seemed a key element in the process. Has that taken place? It sounded like there were at least a couple of tens of millions to be raised. Have those donations been flooding in? The NC$$ typically moves at what might be described as a glacial pace. Does the recent NC$$ announcement change that?


There were doubters on the time line, even among RIT faithful. The problem was the NCAA had already told RIT, prior to them even submitting the application, that they intended to reject the application. The school had started to consult with its attorneys and a couple of other schools who were in a similar boat, about challenging the NCAA's position legally. How much that threat of legal action moved the NCAA to this potentially new stance I do not know, but the general feeling was that if it had to go the legal route it could take quite a while, hence the pessimism among many. This potentially opens the door much quicker to the women moving to DI.

As far as the arena goes, my understanding is that the plans are basically in the works (they selected an architectural firm from the Toronto area who has some experience in designing arenas from what I understand and have received 2 designs from them) and a site on the campus has been selected, although that location has not been formally announced. On the fund raising front, all I have heard is "we are getting there". I haven't heard anything remotely negative about the funding campaign, so I can only assume things are going about as planned. I do know that they designed the rink plans with some flexibility in them, not with regards to the arena itself, but to some of the other parts of it (one version has a parking garage and a pedestrian tunnel or bridge in the design) so that they can move more quickly if they so choose, with less initial capital needed.
 
Re: Possible Good New for RIT Women

Should be news, but the s stuck

From the NCAA 7/5/11 News of the Day

RIT was very involved with this legislation from what I've heard. The lawyers are hard at work.
The arena campaign is going very well, some athletic staff at the Tiger open brought back a one page handout of a picture and general info on the arena. It looks amazing!
 
Re: Possible Good New for RIT Women

The bottom line question is the timeline. My impression from conversations with Tiger faithful (who clearly would know) during the finals in Rochester was that this was not happening any time real soon. Ground being broken for the new arena seemed a key element in the process. Has that taken place? It sounded like there were at least a couple of tens of millions to be raised. Have those donations been flooding in? The NC$$ typically moves at what might be described as a glacial pace. Does the recent NC$$ announcement change that?

Having had the chance to speak to several of the VP level admins about this, and RIT President Destler himself, the hold up is not from RIT. Everyone involved in the program wants it in Division 1 asap. RIT has invested significant time and resources into finding a way to move the program.
 
Back
Top