USCHO Fan Forum
This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
-
The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.
Pay for Play is approved: The Rich get Richer. Too Costly for non BCS schools?
- Thread starter 4four4
- Start date
ExileOnDaytonStreet
Drunkard
Re: Pay for Play is approved: The Rich get Richer. Too Costly for non BCS schools?
Stupid
Stupid
scoreboard
Registered User
I agree. This will ruin football and basketball for starters. College hockey will eventually be just the Big 10, ND and BC. Will be interesting to see how the schools allocate the money. Do football players get the money and tennis players don't? Could there be lawsuits based on distribution of the funds?
Re: Pay for Play is approved: The Rich get Richer. Too Costly for non BCS schools?
I am under the assumption it is all or nothing. It is going to be interesting what smaller schools like the BHHC do. Are they a part of it? If not it is a huge blow to them.
I am under the assumption it is all or nothing. It is going to be interesting what smaller schools like the BHHC do. Are they a part of it? If not it is a huge blow to them.
Re: Pay for Play is approved: The Rich get Richer. Too Costly for non BCS schools?
This will do nothing for the scandels that have rocked college sports. This will stop some of the - I need $20 for gas in the car stories only. But it won't stop students from selling various memorabelia if they can make money off it, imo.
What this is really going to hurt is the smaller non-revenue sports. You could see some of these programss cut because the cost of the extra money will be too much.
This will do nothing for the scandels that have rocked college sports. This will stop some of the - I need $20 for gas in the car stories only. But it won't stop students from selling various memorabelia if they can make money off it, imo.
What this is really going to hurt is the smaller non-revenue sports. You could see some of these programss cut because the cost of the extra money will be too much.
Almington
Blood Boiling with Rage and Hate
Re: Pay for Play is approved: The Rich get Richer. Too Costly for non BCS schools?
Depends on how the conferences implement the changes, I suspect that most if not all D1 conferences will allow it for both men's and women's basketball, and that as long as the funds are distributed on title IX standards then it shouldn't be an issue to not have all sports receive the extra funding.
Depends on how the conferences implement the changes, I suspect that most if not all D1 conferences will allow it for both men's and women's basketball, and that as long as the funds are distributed on title IX standards then it shouldn't be an issue to not have all sports receive the extra funding.
Re: Pay for Play is approved: The Rich get Richer. Too Costly for non BCS schools?
Does the NCAA think that any of these players(football mostly) really think that $2000 a year will be enough. Funny thing is this rule will probably only
help those that follow the rules.
Does the NCAA think that any of these players(football mostly) really think that $2000 a year will be enough. Funny thing is this rule will probably only
help those that follow the rules.
JF_Gophers
2147483647
Re: Pay for Play is approved: The Rich get Richer. Too Costly for non BCS schools?
If this helps cut crappy sports from the schools budgets, I am all for it.
Leave useless things like lacrosse, rowing, golf, cross country, etc. at the club level.
If this helps cut crappy sports from the schools budgets, I am all for it.
Leave useless things like lacrosse, rowing, golf, cross country, etc. at the club level.
Nick Papagiorgio
Holding court
Re: Pay for Play is approved: The Rich get Richer. Too Costly for non BCS schools?
This is great. Let's give these kids some money to buy synethetic marijuana and coke. Or bankroll their dogfighting enterprise.
This is great. Let's give these kids some money to buy synethetic marijuana and coke. Or bankroll their dogfighting enterprise.
Re: Pay for Play is approved: The Rich get Richer. Too Costly for non BCS schools?
What's your problem with lacrosse? And rowing has a long and storied intercollegiate history.
Powers &8^]
What's your problem with lacrosse? And rowing has a long and storied intercollegiate history.
Powers &8^]
Re: Pay for Play is approved: The Rich get Richer. Too Costly for non BCS schools?
The problem is that most people not on this board think hockey is one of those "crappy sports" you refer to.
This is not a good thing for most schools, especially those without football/basketball to generate the $$.
The problem is that most people not on this board think hockey is one of those "crappy sports" you refer to.
This is not a good thing for most schools, especially those without football/basketball to generate the $$.
JF_Gophers
2147483647
Re: Pay for Play is approved: The Rich get Richer. Too Costly for non BCS schools?
Except I was stating what I wanted. Not what others wanted. I know my school won't cut hockey. It makes money.
FlagDUDE08
Banned
Re: Pay for Play is approved: The Rich get Richer. Too Costly for non BCS schools?
2000 bucks...
College students are in session probably about maybe 35 weeks...
give or take...
I am whiting out part of my post for the benefit of the posters that constantly complain about math...
2000 / 35 = $57 1/7...
And how much do the Major Junior players get "paid", again?
2000 bucks...
College students are in session probably about maybe 35 weeks...
give or take...
I am whiting out part of my post for the benefit of the posters that constantly complain about math...
2000 / 35 = $57 1/7...
And how much do the Major Junior players get "paid", again?
Re: Pay for Play is approved: The Rich get Richer. Too Costly for non BCS schools?
That's true, but when the 58 (no, sorry 57) schools left start looking at budgets, some of them will. Not Big Ten schools, but schools that have to "pay" for FB/BB players may find the $250K by dropping their hockey team. And in the long run, those choices aren't good for hocley as a sport.
That's true, but when the 58 (no, sorry 57) schools left start looking at budgets, some of them will. Not Big Ten schools, but schools that have to "pay" for FB/BB players may find the $250K by dropping their hockey team. And in the long run, those choices aren't good for hocley as a sport.
Re: Pay for Play is approved: The Rich get Richer. Too Costly for non BCS schools?
You think the University of North Dakota won't find 50 grand for their 25 hockey players?
bronconick
Yep, still here
Re: Pay for Play is approved: The Rich get Richer. Too Costly for non BCS schools?
Entire idea was Delany looking for a way to keep killing off athletic competition to the Big Ten in particular and BCS conferences in general. $55 a week isn't keeping anyone from taking booster money and anyone that's been on campus knows it's not like the football players are the ones hitching rides on the bus and buying ramen now. People on the bus might steal their $400 smart phones and Ipods.
Entire idea was Delany looking for a way to keep killing off athletic competition to the Big Ten in particular and BCS conferences in general. $55 a week isn't keeping anyone from taking booster money and anyone that's been on campus knows it's not like the football players are the ones hitching rides on the bus and buying ramen now. People on the bus might steal their $400 smart phones and Ipods.
Re: Pay for Play is approved: The Rich get Richer. Too Costly for non BCS schools?
Isn't that a pay cut at some football schools?
Isn't that a pay cut at some football schools?
SCSU Euro
New member
Re: Pay for Play is approved: The Rich get Richer. Too Costly for non BCS schools?
Oh good, I was just thinking that as if the top teams weren't stacked enough in the college game, now let's let them throw in more $. Now when a kid is trying to decide between being a 3rd stringer at LSU or starting at Northern Appalachain Valley Community College, there's just one more reason for him to join the big dog in hopes of one day actually sniffing the playing field. And lately when those two teams met LSU's only won by 60... we need to increase that spread.
Oh good, I was just thinking that as if the top teams weren't stacked enough in the college game, now let's let them throw in more $. Now when a kid is trying to decide between being a 3rd stringer at LSU or starting at Northern Appalachain Valley Community College, there's just one more reason for him to join the big dog in hopes of one day actually sniffing the playing field. And lately when those two teams met LSU's only won by 60... we need to increase that spread.
