Puck Swami
New member
Interesting viewpoint from NCAA News:
http://www.ncaabiz.biz/wps/portal/n...licies+to+ease+championships+crunch+-+2-28-00
http://www.ncaabiz.biz/wps/portal/n...licies+to+ease+championships+crunch+-+2-28-00
I thought the article was going to be an apology to priority seat holders for their allocation of seats
Me too. In fact, the article seems to espouse a pro-future-dome viewpoint....
I wish this was true. I believe the "increase" in college hockey fans is due to people loving the idea of outdoor hockey.The continued popularity of college hockey would suggest a growing fan base. The 2009-10 regular season saw two outdoor college games, with more than 38,000 fans on hand at Fenway Park to see Boston College play Boston University and more than 55,000 fans attending the Wisconsin win over Michigan at the Camp Randall Hockey Classic. Next year, Michigan State will play the Wolverines in Michigan Stadium, with more than 80,000 tickets already sold.
It's the NCAA News - the NCAA's own PR newsletter. Were you really expecting them to badmouth their own event?
What you need is a football stadium build like University of Phoenix in Arizona where the field can be taken out and have the floor under the floor specifically designed to sink further down to allow great site lines for a hockey rinkI cringe at the thought of this going 8 pages with people listing their priority, etc like at least 3 other threads did. In the end I think the NCAA is handling it correctly. I am guessing we will be in NHL buildings for many years and only going back to a dome in the demand as well as nearly perfect planning is taken care of.