From what I've seen at Adrian and the rest of the NCHA (limited as it may be), as well as women's D-1 club (Adrian is ranked top 10 there as well), D-3 is a faster and more talented game.
Any feedback on the quality of play vs. Division 3 schools? For kids who don't have a D1 option where is the better hockey -- a top ACHA school or a mid tier Division 3?
URI is 16-4-3 in ACHA D1 this year. They lost two exhibition games to Sacred Heart at the beginning of the year 4-2 and 3-1. Sacred Heart is 3-10-5 this year in non exhibition games against other NCAA programs.
Could a top club team beat a middle of the road D3 team on any given day? Sure it could happen. Is the level of play (and especially the level of competition, for that matter) day in and day out going to be anywhere close to what it is in the NCAA, not a chance.
Any feedback on the quality of play vs. Division 3 schools? For kids who don't have a D1 option where is the better hockey -- a top ACHA school or a mid tier Division 3?
Take it for what you will but Chatham played Liberty University last year (top team in ACHA D1 v. a low-end d3 team). Chatham easily outplayed Liberty both games (despite the score being fairly even). I found D1 ACHA to be surprisingly bad. There were girls on Liberty that could hardly skate. Any player who would be a first or second liner on any D3 team can light it up in ACHA.
Take it for what you will but Chatham played Liberty University last year (top team in ACHA D1 v. a low-end d3 team). Chatham easily outplayed Liberty both games (despite the score being fairly even). I found D1 ACHA to be surprisingly bad. There were girls on Liberty that could hardly skate. Any player who would be a first or second liner on any D3 team can light it up in ACHA.
Let's take a look at two different programs, Finlandia University D-3 and Miami University ACHA-D1. Finlandia 0-15-0, Miami 18-1-2. F.U. has 12 players with AAA or High School experience, Miami has 20 of 21. Approximate tuition costs for 4 years, F.U. $79,928, Miami $53064 with a difference of $26,856. Without a detailed look at available courses, I think it is fair to assume that Miami would have an advantage due to it's size. Taking this into consideration, I think it is fairly obvious why experienced players are choosing the ACHA D-1 route over a program like F.U. Education, less expense and enjoyment of the sport or playing on a D-3 team that hasn't won a game in two and three quarter seasons with a hefty bill at the end of four years. As far as playing ability, I will make a generalization and say there are D-3 caliber players on ACHA teams and ACHA caliber players on some D-3 teams. We will let coaching go to a different post. I am not making a comparison with the successful D-3 programs, just the point where D-3 and ACHA overlap.