What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

I have to go with the Patriots (Super Bowl XVIII)

reciprocate

New member
You might be one of those who hate the Patriots, especially after they beat the Chiefs and the sensation Mahomes for another trip to the Super Bowl. NBA has the dominant and even improved Warriors, NFL has the New England Patriots. Pats struggled a little bit this season but they found a way to win - and even secure a chance for another ring. I have to go with Brady because his talent is special. Many people doubted him but he proved them wrong against the Chargers and the Chiefs this season. Coach Belichick and Brady will simply not allow another loss in the Super Bowl. I'm expecting crazy plays and James White will be too much for the Rams to handle. What do you think? Watch Super Bowl 2020 Live Stream on CBS.

The Rams were a standout amongst the best groups in the NFL from wire to wire, and in the end spoke to the NFC in the Super Bowl. They missed the mark in that game and did not actually give themselves in greatness their exhibition, however they'll return a significant part of a similar center in 2019 and they ought to be relied upon to by and by wind up among the internal hover contenders for the Lombardi Trophy.

The Rams have the best inside pass rusher in the class in Aaron Donald, and a solid auxiliary surge man on the inside in Michael Brockets. They brought back Dante Fowler Jr. on a one-year, $12 million arrangement, and furthermore brought Clay Matthews over from the Packers on a one-year bargain.

Be that as it may, Matthews will be 33 years of age this season, Fowler sandwiched his eight-sack 2017 with four sacks in 2016 and 2018, and recorded just two sacks in eight amusements with the Rams last season, and there isn't much in the method for profundity behind those folks. Matthews appears to probably spend probably a portion of his time playing inside linebacker, with Samson Ebukam going about as the surge man off the edge inverse Fowler.

Will 2018 draft picks Trevon Young, Justin Lawler, and Ogbonnia Okoronkwo truly give the edge profundity this group needs? Presumably not. That is the place Perry, another previous Packer, comes in.

He missed quite a bit of last season because of damage, yet recorded 18 sacks, 30 quarterback hits, and 18 handles for misfortune in 2016 and 2017. With the Rams having just $6.6 million in top room, as indicated by Spotrac, they can't stand to go major game chasing, even since signings don't influence the compensatory pick counts. So taking fliers on low-cash, moderate-upside folks is the fix here, and Perry possesses all the necessary qualities.
 
Last edited:
Re: I have to go with the Patriots (Super Bowl XVIII)

I think Carson City is the capital of Nevada.
 
Re: I have to go with the Patriots (Super Bowl XVIII)

My concern about the Pats is that they aren't as good as they were last year, at least offensively, and they lost that game. I couldn't tell you if the Rams are better or worse than last year's Eagles squad. Look, its an old and slow team. That didn't hurt them against KC or the other LA team because they've inexplicably found a pass rush despite being ranked near the bottom in sacks during the regular season. Not sure if that's the result of some killer scheming or not but they're going to need that more than anything else in the SB to get the D off the field.
 
Re: I have to go with the Patriots (Super Bowl XVIII)

My concern about the Pats is that they aren't as good as they were last year, at least offensively, and they lost that game. I couldn't tell you if the Rams are better or worse than last year's Eagles squad. Look, its an old and slow team. That didn't hurt them against KC or the other LA team because they've inexplicably found a pass rush despite being ranked near the bottom in sacks during the regular season. Not sure if that's the result of some killer scheming or not but they're going to need that more than anything else in the SB to get the D off the field.
Not sure if that's the result of some killer scheming or not but they're going to need that more than anything else in the SB to get the D off the field.
ToP: 38 minutes against LAC, 36 against KC. Big factor.
 
Re: I have to go with the Patriots (Super Bowl XVIII)

Bots gonna bot.

Mark Thompson spoke about this on Make It Plain this morning. There are the bots that are electronic programs that post spam and trawl for responses, and then there are the bots that are people who adopt and spit back those bots' messages without realizing they originated from a bot.
 
Re: I have to go with the Patriots (Super Bowl XVIII)

I'm gonna go with the Los Angeles Raiders.

Tom Brady is good. But 6 year old Tom Brady didn't stand a chance in Super Bowl XVIII. So, unless someone has invented time travel, Patriots don't stand a chance in this one.
 
Re: I have to go with the Patriots (Super Bowl XVIII)

I'm going with a busload of Ditkas.
 
Re: I have to go with the Patriots (Super Bowl XVIII)

If you have to go with the Patriots, leave bread crumbs. That's kidnapping.
 
Re: I have to go with the Patriots (Super Bowl XVIII)

Are you guys watching too much TV lately? If you're not watching, then say no we don't like it. Then it's done!

and yes I am a robot.



Why is this poster allowed to post? is "Board" as useless as it was when I was actually active here 10 years ago?
 
Back
Top