driventoit
New member
For a fan of the women's game the off-season has to be the longest and deadest in all of sports; so why not spend some time "centralizing" the occasional observations about growth/development that are otherwise scattered throughout various threads in the course of a season?
Recent examples (from, among others, Blackbeard, Trillium, Watson Rink, Old Dave) include questions about conditioning vs. skill development; the relative absence of shooters and of shooting drills; the relative absence of development itself (!); creativity vs. conformity; the implications of the simple demise of the world of pond hockey for today's go-go game. In short: "a complex subject with a lot of variables . . . It certainly deserves a thread of its own . . ." (Trillium).
Another header for this potentially free-wheeling discussion might be: Can the women's game really get more exciting than it already is?
Recent examples (from, among others, Blackbeard, Trillium, Watson Rink, Old Dave) include questions about conditioning vs. skill development; the relative absence of shooters and of shooting drills; the relative absence of development itself (!); creativity vs. conformity; the implications of the simple demise of the world of pond hockey for today's go-go game. In short: "a complex subject with a lot of variables . . . It certainly deserves a thread of its own . . ." (Trillium).
Another header for this potentially free-wheeling discussion might be: Can the women's game really get more exciting than it already is?
Last edited: