As good as he was, as creative and imaginative as he was, as smart as he was, and with the unparalleled vision he had on the ice, he still would have been able to find ways to be one of the top scorers in today's systematic game.
While you are absolutely right I think the bigger question is, would Gretzky be Gretzky if he grew from today's system? If he grew up in the current system would he have learned to be as creative?
He said he learned his creativity on the pond, so yes he would be as creative. The bigger question is would today's coaches have let him be as creative during games, and sadly I think the sad answer is they would not. I'm not sure today's game is better. It's definitely different. It's really a matter of which teams systems work better in a given game, always looking for the breakdowns in the opponents systems to take advantage of and "create" scoring chances from. Systems have a high level of predictability so the next step in the evolution of the game is going to be finding more creative ways of beating the opponents systems.
While you are absolutely right I think the bigger question is, would Gretzky be Gretzky if he grew from today's system? If he grew up in the current system would he have learned to be as creative?
I met Wayne when he was 17....he was standing against the support column in Charlie O's after a Rangers-Oilers game.....Gary Burns, my teammate from UNH was with the Rangers.....he was wicked quiet and reserve, and of course surrounded by a lot of female attention......later when another teammate, Dave Lumley was traded to the Oilers, and they went on their Stanley Cup run, I was lucky enough to have tickets, from Lumer, for every game at The Nassau Coliseum! During those 4/5 years, watching Wayne play and then be himself off ice, was an enjoyable and interesting experience for me! Hockey couldn't ask for a better Ambassador!