Are you referring to the 5 year entry contracts??
It doesn't dare them to go on strike. This happens all the time. One side starts off negotiations with an obvious low-ball starting offer. The players will come back with a just as ridiculous counter offer and we go from there...
Who is they? Nobody associated with this wants to lose a season. That doesn't mean both sides won't try their best to get a sweetheart deal. The biggest problem with all of this is the addition of Donald Fehr, unfortunately.
It wasn't even a decade ago that they had a full-year locked out. And they're threatening not playing again, when they've finally started getting people back.
Idiots.
Oh no, are you kidding? Donald Fehr has his hand in hockey now too? That's one guy that won't mind losing an entire season. I wonder if Girgensons ever thought about that?Who is they? Nobody associated with this wants to lose a season. That doesn't mean both sides won't try their best to get a sweetheart deal. The biggest problem with all of this is the addition of Donald Fehr, unfortunately.
Who is they? Nobody associated with this wants to lose a season. That doesn't mean both sides won't try their best to get a sweetheart deal. The biggest problem with all of this is the addition of Donald Fehr, unfortunately.
You're joking right?
Gary Bettman is the absolute worst. The owners are almost as bad. Leading up to free-agency, the owner of the Minnesota Wild said this:
"We're not making money, and that's one reason we need to fix our system. We need to fix how much we're spending right now. [The Wild's] revenues are fine. We're down a little bit in attendance, but we're up in sponsorships, we're up in TV revenue. And so the revenue that we're generating is not the issue as much as our expenses. And [the Wild's] biggest expense by far is player salaries"
He then signed two players to almost $200 million worth of deals....
Regardless of whether you think the ludicrous offer made by the owners is gamesmanship, or just an average negotiating technique, it's hard to imagine it being a good starting point. This is especially true because the last go-round resulted in the players taking a cut from revenues, and the 11% cut proposed in the current proposal is completely contradictory to everything Bettman has said about the last CBA being successful. In fact, revenues have risen around 7% annually during that period.
My question is, why is Bettman looking to completely overhaul the system considering how well it has worked? Why not just change some small things like how contracts are scored (eliminating bonuses as an option for payment so the cap is a real cap) and a couple other small things? It seems like pure greediness IMO.
I think the owners wouldn't blink about a locked out season. That is they.
You're joking right?
Gary Bettman is the absolute worst. The owners are almost as bad. Leading up to free-agency, the owner of the Minnesota Wild said this:
"We're not making money, and that's one reason we need to fix our system. We need to fix how much we're spending right now. [The Wild's] revenues are fine. We're down a little bit in attendance, but we're up in sponsorships, we're up in TV revenue. And so the revenue that we're generating is not the issue as much as our expenses. And [the Wild's] biggest expense by far is player salaries"
He then signed two players to almost $200 million worth of deals....
Regardless of whether you think the ludicrous offer made by the owners is gamesmanship, or just an average negotiating technique, it's hard to imagine it being a good starting point. This is especially true because the last go-round resulted in the players taking a cut from revenues, and the 11% cut proposed in the current proposal is completely contradictory to everything Bettman has said about the last CBA being successful. In fact, revenues have risen around 7% annually during that period.
My question is, why is Bettman looking to completely overhaul the system considering how well it has worked? Why not just change some small things like how contracts are scored (eliminating bonuses as an option for payment so the cap is a real cap) and a couple other small things? It seems like pure greediness IMO.
Rant over. However, I did put together a blog piece about this if anyone cares to read any further.
http://citizenweber.wordpress.com/2012/07/14/gary-bettman-thinks-youre-stupid/
I sincerely doubt they want to miss out on a Winter Classic. If they have a lockout, it goes no later than December IMO.