hocktalk90
Registered User
At what point does a school re-evaluate whether their coaching staff is the right fit for the long term success and development of the program and more importantly the players?
Should be at the top of the list: Robert Morris University
RMU just finished their 5th season. The numbers should speak for themselves:
09-10 Overall: 11-24-1 Season win %: 30%
Conf: 3-12-1 Conf win %: 18%
08-09 Overall: 12-20-3 Season win %: 34%
Conf: 5-9-2 Conf win %: 31%
07-08 Overall: 12-22-1 Season win %: 34%
Conf: 2-11-0 Conf win %: 15%
06-07 Overall: 11-22-2 Season win %: 31%
Conf: 1-11-0 Conf win %: 8%
05-06 Overall: 5-24-2 Season win %: 16%
Conf: 2-10-1 Conf win %: 15%
The first year stats look like a first year team stats. After that, there is some improvement considering more players have come in and the players develop as a team, but then everything becomes purely stagnant.
-Head Coach Nate Handrahan has not led the team to more than 12 wins in a season
-They have never achieved a winning season; overall or in conference play
-This year, the first official year without the inaugural class; all players were the recruits of Handrahan, the team’s performance DROPPED
In comparison within the CHA conference:
-Syracuse, only in its second year as a program, made it to the CHA finals and had an above .500 season. RMU only beat them once out of 4 games this year.
-Niagara, in their first year with a new coach this year, went from a 6-25-5 record last year to 12-14-5. RMU only beat them once out of 4 games this year.
Looking just at numbers, the RMU program has not grown in 4 years. The past 4 years only 1 thing has changed in the team; the players.
Should be at the top of the list: Robert Morris University
RMU just finished their 5th season. The numbers should speak for themselves:
09-10 Overall: 11-24-1 Season win %: 30%
Conf: 3-12-1 Conf win %: 18%
08-09 Overall: 12-20-3 Season win %: 34%
Conf: 5-9-2 Conf win %: 31%
07-08 Overall: 12-22-1 Season win %: 34%
Conf: 2-11-0 Conf win %: 15%
06-07 Overall: 11-22-2 Season win %: 31%
Conf: 1-11-0 Conf win %: 8%
05-06 Overall: 5-24-2 Season win %: 16%
Conf: 2-10-1 Conf win %: 15%
The first year stats look like a first year team stats. After that, there is some improvement considering more players have come in and the players develop as a team, but then everything becomes purely stagnant.
-Head Coach Nate Handrahan has not led the team to more than 12 wins in a season
-They have never achieved a winning season; overall or in conference play
-This year, the first official year without the inaugural class; all players were the recruits of Handrahan, the team’s performance DROPPED
In comparison within the CHA conference:
-Syracuse, only in its second year as a program, made it to the CHA finals and had an above .500 season. RMU only beat them once out of 4 games this year.
-Niagara, in their first year with a new coach this year, went from a 6-25-5 record last year to 12-14-5. RMU only beat them once out of 4 games this year.
Looking just at numbers, the RMU program has not grown in 4 years. The past 4 years only 1 thing has changed in the team; the players.