What's new
By:
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

Can B.C. win D-I again?

T

trackjc

Registered User
Will be tough...some interesting stats about the top teams (which may not bear any relevance)
players born outside the US
Union 17
UND 12
Yale 9
B.U. 7
B.C. 1
Maine 10
Miami 3
Notre Dame 5
Merrimack 14
Wisconsin 3
UNO 4

BC needs to recruit more foreign players!;)
 
Last edited:
Re: Can B.C. win D-I again?

I am a sad panda. This level of stupid thread numbers isn't supposed to be reached until March. It's only January.

Why, God, why?
 
Re: Can B.C. win D-I again?

trackjc said:
Will be tough...some interesting stats about the top teams (which may not bear any relevance)
players born outside the US
Union 17
UND 12
Yale 9
B.U. 7
B.C. 1
Maine 10
Miami 3
Notre Dame 5
Merrimack 14
Wisconsin 3
UNO 4

BC needs to recruit more foreign players!;)
Click to expand...

Now I'm confused... I was informed by some very wise men draped in maroon and gold that all UND players are 27 year old Canadians. But now you're telling me only 12 are?!? :confused:
 
Re: Can B.C. win D-I again?

trackjc said:
Will be tough...some interesting stats about the top teams (which may not bear any relevance)
players born outside the US
Union 17
UND 12
Yale 9
B.U. 7
B.C. 1
Maine 10
Miami 3
Notre Dame 5
Merrimack 14
Wisconsin 3
UNO 4

BC needs to recruit more foreign players!;)
Click to expand...

Here is another interesting stat.

The number of ineligible players that are currently playing:
Yale* 1
Union 0
BC 0
BU 0
North Dakota 0
Denver 0
Everyone else 0
 
Last edited:
Re: Can B.C. win D-I again?

Carmine Scarpaglia said:
Here is another interesting stat.

The number of ineligible players that are currently playing:
Yale 1
Union 0
BC 0
BU 0
North Dakota 0
Denver 0
Everyone else 0
Click to expand...

Yes, just blatantly disregard proven facts (the fact that Cahill has been proven eligible by the NCAA) in order to support your biases! This is America, after all!
 
Re: Can B.C. win D-I again?

kdiff77 said:
Yes, just blatantly disregard proven facts (the fact that Cahill has been proven eligible by the NCAA) in order to support your biases! This is America, after all!
Click to expand...

Are you mad I didn't list Brown? Or mad that the NCAA is letting an ineligible player play for Yale*?

I know I know, OJ was innocent because juries are never wrong either.
 
Re: Can B.C. win D-I again?

trackjc said:
Will be tough...some interesting stats about the top teams (which may not bear any relevance)
players born outside the US
Union 17
UND 12
Yale 9
B.U. 7
B.C. 1
Maine 10
Miami 3
Notre Dame 5
Merrimack 14
Wisconsin 3
UNO 4

BC needs to recruit more foreign players!;)
Click to expand...

Wait..what?
 
Re: Can B.C. win D-I again?

Carmine Scarpaglia said:
Are you mad I didn't list Brown? Or mad that the NCAA is letting an ineligible player play for Yale*?

I know I know, OJ was innocent because juries are never wrong either.
Click to expand...

Why would I be mad you didn't mention Brown? I'm commenting on your inability to comprehend that Cahill has been cleared by the NCAA, and unless you can provide counter evidence, I see no reason to believe otherwise.

Most people seem to want to indict Yale and Cahill simply because they don't want Yale to be good. But they are. Sucks.
 
Re: Can B.C. win D-I again?

kdiff77 said:
Why would I be mad you didn't mention Brown? I'm commenting on your inability to comprehend that Cahill has been cleared by the NCAA, and unless you can provide counter evidence, I see no reason to believe otherwise.

Most people seem to want to indict Yale and Cahill simply because they don't want Yale to be good. But they are. Sucks.
Click to expand...

Yale* isnt worth the mention because they will be like USC football once they get sanctioned. Brown will win a banner before Yale* will. At least Brown will do it legitimately and won't have to cheat.
 
Re: Can B.C. win D-I again?

Onion Man said:
Yale* isnt worth the mention because they will be like USC football once they get sanctioned. Brown will win a banner before Yale* will. At least Brown will do it legitimately and won't have to cheat.
Click to expand...

Buddy...I'm a Brown fan too. Why do you seem to think I'm choosing Yale over Brown here?

The fact of the matter is that Yale hasn't been found guilty of cheating. They have checked and re-checked the situation with the NCAA, the Ivy League, and the ECAC, and he has been cleared on all three fronts. Objectively, he's good to go.

Do I want Yale to be better than Brown? No. But they are. And Cahill is an ELIGIBLE (and significant) part of that #1 team.
 
Re: Can B.C. win D-I again?

Does this remind anyone else of a really bad installment of the Chappelle Show skit "When Keepin' It Real Goes Wrong"?

I honestly expect someone to end their next post with "I don't like people playing on my phone."
 
Re: Can B.C. win D-I again?

SCSU Euro said:
Does this remind anyone else of a really bad installment of the Chappelle Show skit "When Keepin' It Real Goes Wrong"?

I honestly expect someone to end their next post with "I don't like people playing on my phone."
Click to expand...

You a b****, and so is your aunt.
 
Re: Can B.C. win D-I again?

kdiff77 said:
Buddy...I'm a Brown fan too. Why do you seem to think I'm choosing Yale over Brown here?

The fact of the matter is that Yale hasn't been found guilty of cheating. They have checked and re-checked the situation with the NCAA, the Ivy League, and the ECAC, and he has been cleared on all three fronts. Objectively, he's good to go.

Do I want Yale to be better than Brown? No. But they are. And Cahill is an ELIGIBLE (and significant) part of that #1 team.
Click to expand...

Yale* is as guilty as sin. Unfortunately, it won't come out for years and when it does it won't matter.
 
Re: Can B.C. win D-I again?

kdiff77 said:
Yes, just blatantly disregard proven facts (the fact that Cahill has been proven eligible by the NCAA) in order to support your biases! This is America, after all!
Click to expand...

how do you know he meant cahill? maybe he has information on someone else coming down the pipeline. i think you should put away your jump to conclusions mat. didnt you hear that it was a horrible, horrible idea in the first place?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top