What's new
By:
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

Cahill @ Yale - eligibility in question?

Re: Cahill @ Yale - eligibility in question?

why would someone bother to start this thread

The NCAA is a lousy organization that must be run by very very old and angry men who impose rules aimed at ruining the lives of young men. They have no interest whatsoever in the wefare of the student athlete-they are interested in money only. They make billions by exploying free labor and making sure an athlete doesn't get a ride to the food kitchen when he/she is dying of hunger. So they disqualify kids for absolutely no good reason.
Happlily they made the right decision here. Who on Earth cares if this young man played in France for a year. How does that "poison" the amateur nature of college hockey. I am concerned also--that anyone is so mean-spirited as to question this kid's right to play a sport he loves.
 
Re: Cahill @ Yale - eligibility in question?

Keep all this bulletin board apcray coming. I'm sending it all to Jimmy Martin..... and the entire team gets it. As for
my dear friend Cahill, well, check the BOX SCORE!!!!!!

UML said:
Yale is full of cheaters.
Click to expand...
 
Re: Cahill @ Yale - eligibility in question?

czeckthebody said:
why would someone bother to start this thread

The NCAA is a lousy organization that must be run by very very old and angry men who impose rules aimed at ruining the lives of young men. They have no interest whatsoever in the wefare of the student athlete-they are interested in money only. They make billions by exploying free labor and making sure an athlete doesn't get a ride to the food kitchen when he/she is dying of hunger. So they disqualify kids for absolutely no good reason.
Happlily they made the right decision here. Who on Earth cares if this young man played in France for a year. How does that "poison" the amateur nature of college hockey. I am concerned also--that anyone is so mean-spirited as to question this kid's right to play a sport he loves.
Click to expand...

The only schools that are "exploiting" free labor are the Ivy's.

Most of these kids are getting $200,000 worth of scholarship money.
 
Re: Cahill @ Yale - eligibility in question?

Eaglefan06 said:
The only schools that are "exploiting" free labor are the Ivy's.

Most of these kids are getting $200,000 worth of scholarship money.
Click to expand...

I don't think you need to worry about the recruited student athletes of the Ivy League, they are taken care of , one way or the other, and quite frankly, all of them deserve what they get, scholarship or not. About $35,000.00 in ticket money was generated at Yale Mens Hockey tonight, not to mention parking, and other profits.
 
Re: Cahill @ Yale - eligibility in question?

HOCKEYGUY23 said:
George Bush had balls the size of church bells not like the guy that's running the country now.
Click to expand...
In the history of 35th posts, yours is the ultimate in pure unadulterated buffoonery. Congratulations on that.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top