2022-23 Rules Changes

[The Sicatoka]

Rules Changes:
https://www.ncaa.org/news/2022/7/21...rsight,charged for the unsuccessful challenge.

Rules Changes Summary:
https://twitter.com/SchlossmanGF/st...wcon255Es1_26ref_url=https://siouxsports.com/

PWR Tweek ... aaaaagain:
https://twitter.com/jimmyconnelly/s...r^|twcon^s1_&ref_url=https://siouxsports.com/

 

[The Sicatoka]

... the NCAAIceHockey committee has approved a 67%/33% win percentage share for 3v3 OT wins ...

67% for an OT win? Seems right considering only 67% of winning team's players are on the ice (4, not 6). < glare >


Not a fan of gimmick OT rules

 

[The Sicatoka]

This is from 2015 but I still advocate these changes.
https://boardsroom.blogspot.com/2015/02/what-nchc-needs-to-change.html

(My OT would stay 5x5.)

 

[TalonsUpPuckDown]

67% for an OT win? Seems right considering only 67% of winning team's players are on the ice (4, not 6). < glare >


Not a fan of gimmick OT rules

LOL. A lesson in how to do snark on a message board... ;-)

 

[purpleinnebraska]

Would the 67 vs 55 have made any difference at all in last year's Pairwise? This seems like the kind of thing that inspires a lot of message board fights, but has no practical effect.

 

[Lost_Husky]

Would the 67 vs 55 have made any difference at all in last year's Pairwise? This seems like the kind of thing that inspires a lot of message board fights, but has no practical effect.

It might have for Michigan Tech. I'm not going to recalculate PW, but Tech had 11 regular season games go to OT. Two more if you count conference playoffs. Tech lost most of those.