What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

2016 Presidential Election: July Edition

2016 Presidential Election: July Edition

  • Clinton (D)

    Votes: 15 51.7%
  • Johnson (L)

    Votes: 8 27.6%
  • Stein (G)

    Votes: 1 3.4%
  • Trump (R)

    Votes: 1 3.4%
  • Other (specify in a comment if you wish)

    Votes: 1 3.4%
  • Will leave blank / not vote

    Votes: 3 10.3%

  • Total voters
    29
  • Poll closed .

Kepler

Cornell Big Red
(This be be a recurrent poll question as we get closer to the election.)

For whom do you plan to vote?
 
Re: 2016 Presidential Election: July Edition

Something tells me that this thread is not indicative of the population as a whole.

...We might not be statistically relevant. :eek:
 
Something tells me that this thread is not indicative of the population as a whole.

...We might not be statistically relevant. :eek:

I'd say that it will be some indication of the college educated white male vote between 30 and 50, for what that's worth (basically nothing). It follows with the fact that Trump reportedly struggles with that portion of the electorate
 
Re: 2016 Presidential Election: July Edition

I'd say that it will be some indication of the college educated white male vote between 30 and 50, for what that's worth (basically nothing). It follows with the fact that Trump reportedly struggles with that portion of the electorate

That wouldn't surprise me in the least. I've pretty much dropped out of following this campaign after both parties selected their nominees, and never followed the demographic breakdowns of any poll.
 
Re: 2016 Presidential Election: July Edition

Something tells me that this thread is not indicative of the population as a whole.

...We might not be statistically relevant. :eek:

That's probably how the voting here in DC will go. Then again, we are not statistically relevant either. :D
 
Re: 2016 Presidential Election: July Edition

Not a single vote for Trump. What demographics are unrepresented here? Is it that hockey fans just can't identify with a guy with small hands?
 
Last edited:
Not a single vote for Trump. What demographics are unrepresented here? Is it that hockey fans just can't identify with a guy with small hands?

Plenty of conservatives on this site. They just realize that Trump isn't really one of them. He's just nuts.
 
Re: 2016 Presidential Election: July Edition

Plenty of conservatives on this site. They just realize that Trump isn't really one of them. He's just nuts.

Probably true, but he is the party's candidate because a LOT of Republicans voted for him. What group is that which is not represented here?
 
Probably true, but he is the party's candidate because a LOT of Republicans voted for him. What group is that which is not represented here?

I'd say that this board skews towards those with at least some college. Support for Trump is inversely related to education level among white males.
 
Re: 2016 Presidential Election: July Edition

I'd say that this board skews towards those with at least some college. Support for Trump is inversely related to education level among white males.

I think the only difference is that some Trump supporters can see through his sh*, but choose him anyway because NOT HILLARY.
 
Re: 2016 Presidential Election: July Edition

I think the only difference is that some Trump supporters can see through his sh*, but choose him anyway because NOT HILLARY.

You may be right, Brent, but that's still an exercise in ignorance (if not simply a means to confirm bias) unless they are making at least some effort at a benefit/detriment analysis.
 
Re: 2016 Presidential Election: July Edition

You may be right, Brent, but that's still an exercise in ignorance (if not simply a means to confirm bias) unless they are making at least some effort at a benefit/detriment analysis.

I agree that it is a level of ignorance. I see the same in the Bernie converts for Hillary. This year REALLY sucks for politics.
 
Re: 2016 Presidential Election: July Edition

I agree that it is a level of ignorance. I see the same in the Bernie converts for Hillary. This year REALLY sucks for politics.

I would have preferred Bernie but will support Hillary over Trump without any hesitation whatsoever. For me, it's a no-brainer.
 
Back
Top