Re: Official UNH Wildcats Offseason Thread 2012
I always come back to be careful what you wish for... Army, Sneddon even Cahoon were big "hits" at their schools when hired. Would you trade Umile for any of them? A flip is who in Hockey East would you trade Umile for going forward not past wins? York - yes, Dennehy, Leamen or Bazin - maybe not the track record but certainly the potential, Parker or Whitehead - I wouldn't, I don't even consider the other 3.
My issue is recruiting is not performing as it should. The talent isn't getting on campus. Doing the same thing over and over again (since Borek arrived in 2002) and expecting different results is the definition of insanity. Borek seems to be a nice guy and I wouldn't argue that he is high energy, however there is something fundamentally flawed in the current strategy. Maybe Borek just can't see the talent, there is a story about Standbrook and Crowder at Maine - Crowder couldn't see the talent.
Beyond just identifying the kids there is a problem in the process with getting them on campus, be it admissions or to me the bigger issue is deferrals. I worry the deferrals are less about talent and more about the 18 being filled so the money isn't available. In many cases by some other deferral finally coming in, it is a "cap space" problem and it is costing UNH hockey credibility more than the players.
I have always been told in general Umile is HC and does forward work, Tortorella is the D, PK and Goalies, Borek is Recruiting PP and Forwards. Yes they all do recruiting. I have no problem with young and old coaches on the staff.
If that summary is correct I am most galled by recruiting and the power play. That is the role that needs significant improvement. You would think the pattern would be obvious with 10 years of declining results. Borek’s first year was .738% winning and it has trended down since.
I don’t really want a new head coach. But if I am athletic director I am pointing out these issues and asking for action plans to correct them. The trend is disturbing and the data points to one coach and HC either needs to fix it or somebody else needs to be the HC.
P.S. Watcher - I'm happy your back for some reasoned banter.
I always come back to be careful what you wish for... Army, Sneddon even Cahoon were big "hits" at their schools when hired. Would you trade Umile for any of them? A flip is who in Hockey East would you trade Umile for going forward not past wins? York - yes, Dennehy, Leamen or Bazin - maybe not the track record but certainly the potential, Parker or Whitehead - I wouldn't, I don't even consider the other 3.
My issue is recruiting is not performing as it should. The talent isn't getting on campus. Doing the same thing over and over again (since Borek arrived in 2002) and expecting different results is the definition of insanity. Borek seems to be a nice guy and I wouldn't argue that he is high energy, however there is something fundamentally flawed in the current strategy. Maybe Borek just can't see the talent, there is a story about Standbrook and Crowder at Maine - Crowder couldn't see the talent.
Beyond just identifying the kids there is a problem in the process with getting them on campus, be it admissions or to me the bigger issue is deferrals. I worry the deferrals are less about talent and more about the 18 being filled so the money isn't available. In many cases by some other deferral finally coming in, it is a "cap space" problem and it is costing UNH hockey credibility more than the players.
I have always been told in general Umile is HC and does forward work, Tortorella is the D, PK and Goalies, Borek is Recruiting PP and Forwards. Yes they all do recruiting. I have no problem with young and old coaches on the staff.
If that summary is correct I am most galled by recruiting and the power play. That is the role that needs significant improvement. You would think the pattern would be obvious with 10 years of declining results. Borek’s first year was .738% winning and it has trended down since.
I don’t really want a new head coach. But if I am athletic director I am pointing out these issues and asking for action plans to correct them. The trend is disturbing and the data points to one coach and HC either needs to fix it or somebody else needs to be the HC.
P.S. Watcher - I'm happy your back for some reasoned banter.
Comment