We Cannot Have Nice Things: Michigan Tech 2010-2011 Season Thread: Part Tre

[melmac]

Re: We Cannot Have Nice Things: Michigan Tech 2010-2011 Season Thread: Part Tre

Except its Thursday...

Thank you.
I thought I was losing what's left of my mind.

[The_Commissioner]

Re: We Cannot Have Nice Things: Michigan Tech 2010-2011 Season Thread: Part Tre

here we ago again. Friday. hockey night.

The Perpetual Losing Culture produces side effects in fans too.

[The Darkness]

Re: We Cannot Have Nice Things: Michigan Tech 2010-2011 Season Thread: Part Tre

You made me incredible happy for a second. And then sent me crashing down to earth.

You really must be a Husky at heart.

[FadeToBlack&Gold]

Re: We Cannot Have Nice Things: Michigan Tech 2010-2011 Season Thread: Part Tre

The Perpetual Losing Culture produces side effects in fans too.

It has already stricken me with the inability to recognize anyone's sarcasm but my own.

[FadeToBlack&Gold]

Re: We Cannot Have Nice Things: Michigan Tech 2010-2011 Season Thread: Part Tre

Good of 3W to keep it professional

[The_Commissioner]

Re: We Cannot Have Nice Things: Michigan Tech 2010-2011 Season Thread: Part Tre

Good of 3W to keep it professional

First question (not rhetorical): Who is Brandon Veale and what qualifies him to write for a newspaper? Oh wait, I just answered my own question. He writes for the Mining Gazette which means as long as he knows the difference between 'lose' and 'loose', he is qualified.

Next, I'm struck by the dereliction of duty attitude this guy projects. All he is going to do (perhaps paid to do?) is tell his readers "What happened?"

Brandon, I hate to break this earth shattering news to you, but I already know what happened. I'll read past the first paragraph in your article to find out why it happened. True, it takes quite a bit more knowledge, not to mention intellect, to develop the answer to the "Why?" question and maybe the Mining Gazette paycheck doesn't buy that kind of analysis. But until you give the reader more than the obvious, you're going to find yourself forever stuck working at backwater puppy trainers like the Mining Gazette.

[bigblue_dl]

Re: We Cannot Have Nice Things: Michigan Tech 2010-2011 Season Thread: Part Tre

First question (not rhetorical): Who is Brandon Veale and what qualifies him to write for a newspaper? Oh wait, I just answered my own question. He writes for the Mining Gazette which means as long as he knows the difference between 'lose' and 'loose', he is qualified.

Next, I'm struck by the dereliction of duty attitude this guy projects. All he is going to do (perhaps paid to do?) is tell his readers "What happened?"

Brandon, I hate to break this earth shattering news to you, but I already know what happened. I'll read past the first paragraph in your article to find out why it happened. True, it takes quite a bit more knowledge, not to mention intellect, to develop the answer to the "Why?" question and maybe the Mining Gazette paycheck doesn't buy that kind of analysis. But until you give the reader more than the obvious, you're going to find yourself forever stuck working at backwater puppy trainers like the Mining Gazette.

Nice work, attacking a fellow poster for doing his job.

[FadeToBlack&Gold]

Re: We Cannot Have Nice Things: Michigan Tech 2010-2011 Season Thread: Part Tre

I freely admit that there are occasions when I wish I had kept my mouth shut or unplugged my keyboard.

This is going to be one of those occasions.

[The_Commissioner]

Re: We Cannot Have Nice Things: Michigan Tech 2010-2011 Season Thread: Part Tre

Nice work, attacking a fellow poster for doing his job.

Dude, you missed the point. He's not doing his job unless he doesn't consider himself a journalist.

[FadeToBlack&Gold]

Re: We Cannot Have Nice Things: Michigan Tech 2010-2011 Season Thread: Part Tre

Dude, you missed the point. He's not doing his job unless he doesn't consider himself a journalist.

He's a reporter, not an investigative journalist. It's not his job to go on a witch hunt.

[bigblue_dl]

Re: We Cannot Have Nice Things: Michigan Tech 2010-2011 Season Thread: Part Tre

Dude, you missed the point. He's not doing his job unless he doesn't consider himself a journalist.

Apparently I missed the part where it is a reporter's job to throw the teams he covers under the bus. I'm sure that is a great way to get interviews in the future.

[huskyfan]

Re: We Cannot Have Nice Things: Michigan Tech 2010-2011 Season Thread: Part Tre

Good of 3W to keep it professional

this is what caused all the controversy?? he's a reporter. duh. not a king. he's doing his job describing what happened.

of course. that's just me. I think it Friday. thank god I got set straight and didnt show up at the arena.

[manurespreader]

Re: We Cannot Have Nice Things: Michigan Tech 2010-2011 Season Thread: Part Tre

this is what caused all the controversy?? he's a reporter. duh. not a king. he's doing his job describing what happened.

of course. that's just me. I think it Friday. thank god I got set straight and didnt show up at the arena.

I didn't think they had hockey in St Kitts? just fruity drinks and lots of nearly naked 30 somethings.

where is foxton when you need him.

[ShoelessSchippa]

Re: We Cannot Have Nice Things: Michigan Tech 2010-2011 Season Thread: Part Tre

Oh Please. Read Tech's website and they will continuously talk about how Russell is the second winningest coach at Tech. The LODE bails him out every year for one reason or another. I know they cant, and shouldn't, blame him for every loss, but please stop only showing half skewed stats about our hockey team like we are still relevant in College Division I hockey.

[bigblue_dl]

Re: We Cannot Have Nice Things: Michigan Tech 2010-2011 Season Thread: Part Tre

The huskyfans are in the caribbean? Must be nice!