I thought it would be fun to discuss the favorites as we approach the top 10 being released. Obviously Watts is there with a decent gap back to a scoring clump of Shirley/Giguere/Mueller/Roque/Maltius. I think goalie candidates are pretty much down to Frankel and Browning. I really don't see any D that are statistically dominant, but stats aren't everything, or are they?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
2020 Patty Kazmaier
Collapse
X
-
2020 Patty Kazmaier
Wisconsin Hockey: 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11 WE WANT MORE!
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Come to the Wisconsin Evangelical Lutheran Synod
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally Posted by Wisko McBadgerton:
"Baggot says Hughes and Rockwood are centering the top two lines...
Timothy A --> Great hockey mind... Or Greatest hockey mind?!?"Tags: None
-
Re: 2020 Patty Kazmaier
Originally posted by Timothy A View PostObviously Watts is there with a decent gap back to a scoring clump of Shirley/Giguere/Mueller/Roque/Maltius."... And lose, and start again at your beginnings
And never breathe a word about your loss;" -- Rudyard Kipling
-
Re: 2020 Patty Kazmaier
Originally posted by ARM View PostPoints Per Game is typically a better starting point than raw points, as it is more fair to the Ivy League players and others who play fewer games. By that measure, the first clump after Watts becomes S. Shirley, Sarah Fillier, and Jaycee Gebhard, with Mueller and Giguère close behind.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Timothy A View PostI thought it would be fun to discuss the favorites as we approach the top 10 being released. Obviously Watts is there with a decent gap back to a scoring clump of Shirley/Giguere/Mueller/Roque/Maltius. I think goalie candidates are pretty much down to Frankel and Browning. I really don't see any D that are statistically dominant, but stats aren't everything, or are they?
Comment
-
Re: 2020 Patty Kazmaier
Originally posted by robertearle View PostInterestingly, I think one could make a case that Wisconsin's MVP (at least so far) has been Roque, and not Watts.
One thing that I find interesting is that Giguère and Watts have the same number of career points (Giguère has played four additional games). It feels like Watts has been the more prolific, and she has been, except for last year."... And lose, and start again at your beginnings
And never breathe a word about your loss;" -- Rudyard Kipling
Comment
-
Re: 2020 Patty Kazmaier
Originally posted by ARM View PostFrom what I've seen of each over the years, you'd get no argument from me, but the Kazmaier process has always liked numbers. It is harder to quantify factors such as helping a team win the possession or territorial battles.
Comment
-
Re: 2020 Patty Kazmaier
Originally posted by robertearle View PostInterestingly, I think one could make a case that Wisconsin's MVP (at least so far) has been Roque, and not Watts.Wisconsin Hockey: 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11 WE WANT MORE!
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Come to the Wisconsin Evangelical Lutheran Synod
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally Posted by Wisko McBadgerton:
"Baggot says Hughes and Rockwood are centering the top two lines...
Timothy A --> Great hockey mind... Or Greatest hockey mind?!?"
Comment
-
Re: 2020 Patty Kazmaier
Originally posted by ARM View PostPoints Per Game is typically a better starting point than raw points, as it is more fair to the Ivy League players and others who play fewer games. By that measure, the first clump after Watts becomes S. Shirley, Sarah Fillier, and Jaycee Gebhard, with Mueller and Giguère close behind.Wisconsin Hockey: 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11 WE WANT MORE!
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Come to the Wisconsin Evangelical Lutheran Synod
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally Posted by Wisko McBadgerton:
"Baggot says Hughes and Rockwood are centering the top two lines...
Timothy A --> Great hockey mind... Or Greatest hockey mind?!?"
Comment
-
Re: 2020 Patty Kazmaier
Originally posted by Timothy A View PostExcellent point. It's dumb that all the schools don't play the same amount of games. Another reason to pick the wwcha I guess.
Comment
-
Re: 2020 Patty Kazmaier
I don't think that the top 10 contains any big surprises:
https://www.uscho.com/2020/02/20/six...hockey-player/"... And lose, and start again at your beginnings
And never breathe a word about your loss;" -- Rudyard Kipling
Comment
-
Re: 2020 Patty Kazmaier
I think picking a winner/top 3 is going to be a lot harder/closer than I expected it to be earlier in the yearGrant Salzano, Boston College '10
Writer Emeritus, BC Interruption
Twitter: @Salzano14
Click here for the BC Interruption Pairwise, KRACH, and GRaNT Calculators
Comment
-
Re: 2020 Patty Kazmaier
Originally posted by robertearle View PostI hadn't really thought about it in these terms, but I'm a little surprised to look down the list and not see someone from Minnesota.Minnesota Golden Gopher Hockey
Comment
-
Re: 2020 Patty Kazmaier
You're right; nobody was that close from UM. I think that next up from the WCHA would have been Gabbie Hughes."... And lose, and start again at your beginnings
And never breathe a word about your loss;" -- Rudyard Kipling
Comment
-
Re: 2020 Patty Kazmaier
Nobody from BC either. In fact freshman Hannah Bilka was the only one even nominated -- not even Cayla BarnesGrant Salzano, Boston College '10
Writer Emeritus, BC Interruption
Twitter: @Salzano14
Click here for the BC Interruption Pairwise, KRACH, and GRaNT Calculators
Comment
Comment