Originally posted by Greg Ambrose
View Post
1. Greg, you know exactly “whoever” it was, and yet you chose to go the junior high route. Grow up. You have a problem with what I say, address me directly. Stop with the passive aggressiveness.
2. Where is your reading comprehension? Or are you just so spring-loaded as to assume I disagree? I agree with the concept of climate change. Perhaps you weren’t perceptive enough to pick up on that when I EXPRESSLY said I agree that the earth is warming.
3. There absolutely IS garbage science on both sides, and if you think it’s a lame argument, you live in an echo chamber. It’s why one side (and their media cohorts) say that 187 million people are destined to lose their homes due to ocean levels rising, whIle the other side says it’s between 41,000 and 305,000 (as does their cohort media partner). It’s why one side says we have 11 years to right the ship or all hell breaks loose and the other side says that’s nonsense. MY POINT WAS, it’d be nice if we had a source we felt comfortable with, and in unanimity with to anchor on, and that source simply doesn’t exist today. Especially when the media on both sides amplify the extremes.
4. Two examples of “settled science”: pre-Copernicus galactic orientation and Newtonian physics. Would it be better if we’d stomped our feet in defense of the earth being the center of the universe or ignored relativity? Point is, let’s get very specific and objective about where we are going and stop the sound bite BS.
Now I’m done. Can’t believe this was the best you had. Talk about lame.
Comment