Wisconsin Hockey: 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11 WE WANT MORE!
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Come to the Wisconsin Evangelical Lutheran Synod
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally Posted by Wisko McBadgerton:
"Baggot says Hughes and Rockwood are centering the top two lines...
Timothy A --> Great hockey mind... Or Greatest hockey mind?!?"
An unbelievable goaltending performance by Polusny to beat the Beavers. Over 49 saves and on some great scoring chances. Beavers dominated but couldn’t get it past her. And SCSU’s winning goal was a great laser of a shot. Man, can the goaltenders make the WCHA a tough conference!
The sinners are 0-2 in their last two games. Probably wasn't slow ice today but just that the sinners have a hack in their lineup.
The problem is they have a former BC player in the lineup. Anything or anybody BC = No Natty.
Fan of CLARKSON: 2014, 2017 & 2018 NC$$ WOMEN'S DIV 1 HOCKEY NATIONAL CHAMPIONS *******https://fanforum.uscho.com/core/images/smilies/smile.gi*********
And of 3 Patty Kaz recepients: Jamie Lee Rattray, Loren Gabel and Elizabeth Giguere WHOOOOOOOOO WHOOOOOOOOO
If Union Can Do It So Can CCT (One of These Years) *******https://fanforum.uscho.com/core/images/smilies/smile.gi*********
After a period, it's OSU 1, Wisconsin 0. Again, the Bashers have dominated puck possession, but have done very little with it. The Buckeyes are collapsing down low, and Wisconsin can't solve the puzzle. At the other end, Skaggs faked Bowlby out of her skates and put the puck through Campbell's five hole. She really ought to have made that save.
Not sure what OSU’s line was thinking when they got possession in 3 v 3. They seemed reluctant to take the puck up the ice when they had the chance and it cost them in the end. Good game, though, and an outstanding goaltending performance by OSU.
Not sure what OSU’s line was thinking when they got possession in 3 v 3. They seemed reluctant to take the puck up the ice when they had the chance and it cost them in the end. Good game, though, and an outstanding goaltending performance by OSU.
It felt like their goal was to get it to the shootout, thinking (correctly) that Wisconsin had a big advantage 3-on-3. I'm just not sure that refusing to cross the red line was the best way to survive the 3-on-3.
Braaendli stops Shirley on a penalty shot to keep the score 1-0.
I say it every time: there is no 'penalty' to a penalty shot.
All they do is give you back the opportunity you had taken away. "We caught you robbing a bank, and as a penalty, we're going to make you give the money back."
It should be that you get the shot: if you score, that's it, play on; if you don't score, you get a two-minute power-play as the penalty.
As it is now, given the choice, I'll take the power-play and forget about the 'penalty shot'.
It felt like their goal was to get it to the shootout, thinking (correctly) that Wisconsin had a big advantage 3-on-3. I'm just not sure that refusing to cross the red line was the best way to survive the 3-on-3.
Comment