Re: RPI 2019-2020: Life after Lovisa
For one, a lot has changed in women's hockey in the last 16 years.
Also, just because something worked well enough once before, doesn't mean one should just phone it in and do the same thing, expecting the same result.
Given that Lovisa was as exceptional as she was, and with two more years to go, I would think that there would be a number of experienced Women's coaches that would have relished the opportunity to build a team around that kind of talent, and then have that foundation to build future teams on.
But instead, they just got into bed with some leftovers that Smith didn't even want.
Originally posted by jericho
View Post
Also, just because something worked well enough once before, doesn't mean one should just phone it in and do the same thing, expecting the same result.
Given that Lovisa was as exceptional as she was, and with two more years to go, I would think that there would be a number of experienced Women's coaches that would have relished the opportunity to build a team around that kind of talent, and then have that foundation to build future teams on.
But instead, they just got into bed with some leftovers that Smith didn't even want.
Comment