2020 Democrat Challengers Part II: There Can Be Only One

[GrinCDXX]

Re: 2020 Democrat Challengers Part II: There Can Be Only One

I tend to believe that Dumpy won't win reelection, but if he does, the country is well and truly lost.

[Handyman]

Re: 2020 Democrat Challengers Part II: There Can Be Only One

Why would it have legs? There was a story about him not paying taxes for a decade in part because he managed to crash and burn a casino and screw up real estate a few years ago. It's like the NYT wants to run it every year. I get it. He's **** with money. Catch him actually laundering the money if you want legs on a story.

The Times is just mad they couldnt blame it on Hillary. The Times wants to pretend they didnt spend most of the 80s and 90s kissing Trump's butt or that they arent part of the problem they seem so hell bent on trying to stop now. The Times sucks.

(see also: CNN)

[Rover]

Re: 2020 Democrat Challengers Part II: There Can Be Only One

The Times is just mad they couldnt blame it on Hillary. The Times wants to pretend they didnt spend most of the 80s and 90s kissing Trump's butt or that they arent part of the problem they seem so hell bent on trying to stop now. The Times sucks.

(see also: CNN)

Yup. I also expect a 3 part expose on Hillary's e-mailz!!! next week. Because you know, balance and all that.

[joecct]

If a Democrat had not paid taxes for ten years you'd never get it out of the news.

Ted Kennedy is getting close.

[Kepler]

Re: 2020 Democrat Challengers Part II: There Can Be Only One

Ted Kennedy is getting close.

This was the first funny Kennedy post you have ever made. Bravo!

[joecct]

This was the first funny Kennedy post you have ever made. Bravo!

What about the SEC (sports, not the pariarch's patrimony) and Kennedys?

[Kepler]

Re: 2020 Democrat Challengers Part II: There Can Be Only One

What about the SEC (sports, not the pariarch's patromony) and Kennedys?

I don't remember that one.

[Rover]

Re: 2020 Democrat Challengers Part II: There Can Be Only One

Go Lizzy Go! Small wonder why she's my choice after comments like this:

Elizabeth Warren turned down a Fox News invitation Tuesday for a televised town hall and denounced the cable network as a “hate-for-profit racket that gives a megaphone to racists and conspiracists.”

https://www.politico.com/story/2019/...n-hall-1320068

[mookie1995]

Re: 2020 Democrat Challengers Part II: There Can Be Only One

Go Lizzy Go! Small wonder why she's my choice after comments like this:

Elizabeth Warren turned down a Fox News invitation Tuesday for a televised town hall and denounced the cable network as a “hate-for-profit racket that gives a megaphone to racists and conspiracists.”

https://www.politico.com/story/2019/...n-hall-1320068

hmmm.
she coulda turned that around, and frankly started a new tack on the issue.

she easily can do the 'hands up if you consider yourself racists?'
of course nobody would.
then she easily meanders into the audience and finds a nice looking guy or two and engages them. asks if they feel uncomfortable in the house watching fox and hearing their host talk and seeing a story or two. mention trump with 'good people both sides'. ask if they agree with that.
get a good 5-10 minutes, maybe 15. discussing it with real fox'y audience peeps. letting them tell their view on it.
THAT would be good tv and mookie would be interested to hear how it shakes out.

but alas.......

[The Sicatoka]

Re: 2020 Democrat Challengers Part II: There Can Be Only One

And then there were ... 23.

https://www.reviewjournal.com/news/p...-race-1662876/

Big western state D governor (a state Trump won in 2016).

[FadeToBlack&Gold]

Re: 2020 Democrat Challengers Part II: There Can Be Only One

Go Lizzy Go! Small wonder why she's my choice after comments like this:

Elizabeth Warren turned down a Fox News invitation Tuesday for a televised town hall and denounced the cable network as a “hate-for-profit racket that gives a megaphone to racists and conspiracists.”

https://www.politico.com/story/2019/...n-hall-1320068

Not sure I agree with her turning Faux down. She's far behind in the polls and should be taking any TV opportunity she gets. If she's worried about getting "gotcha'd" they tried that with Sanders and it failed.

[joecct]

and then there were ... 23.

https://www.reviewjournal.com/news/p...-race-1662876/

big western state d governor (a state trump won in 2016).

finally!

[Rover]

Re: 2020 Democrat Challengers Part II: There Can Be Only One

Not sure I agree with her turning Faux down. She's far behind in the polls and should be taking any TV opportunity she gets. If she's worried about getting "gotcha'd" they tried that with Sanders and it failed.

I like her calling them out as a racket peddling racism and conspiracy theories. All Dems need to acknowledge that the media in general is not their friend, and to call them out starting with Fox Snooze. Kudos to her for doing that in no uncertain terms.

I don't begrudge people for going on there, but they're wasting their time. None of these people are going to vote Dem even if they happen to agree with say Bernie's policies to address income inequality vs Goopers cash grab for the rich. The problem is Fox viewers are driven by racial animosity. That is what will get them to the polls and vote Republican, not Medicare for All.

[mookie1995]

Re: 2020 Democrat Challengers Part II: There Can Be Only One

I like her calling them out as a racket peddling racism and conspiracy theories....

oh boy!!! that will draw some notice

[Rover]

Re: 2020 Democrat Challengers Part II: There Can Be Only One

oh boy!!! that will draw some notice

Well she could hire you as campaign manager and start doing events with Asian hookers but aside from winning the Bob Kraft vote that might do more harm than good...