2020 Democrat Challengers Part II: There Can Be Only One

[Rover]

Re: 2020 Democrat Challengers Part II: There Can Be Only One

I remember a Rover who made confident assertions about the election in 2016.

I like you, man, but you don't know a thing about it. Go out and fundraise or canvas or something. Nobody's hiring you as a strategist.

I remember Kepler predicting a Trump win when nobody else did! I just can't find the link. Maybe you'd care to help out?

We're all speculating dude. Try not to take it all so seriously.

[jerphisch]

Re: 2020 Democrat Challengers Part II: There Can Be Only One

We're all speculating dude. Try not to take it all so seriously.

If that was your approach at the time you wouldn't still be getting sh1t for it.

[ScoobyDoo]

Re: 2020 Democrat Challengers Part II: There Can Be Only One

If that was your approach at the time you wouldn't still be getting sh1t for it.

Always been my approach and I get more **** than he does.

[Rover]

Re: 2020 Democrat Challengers Part II: There Can Be Only One

If that was your approach at the time you wouldn't still be getting sh1t for it.

Puleeze. I hate to break this to you but except for the people I know personally you're all just here for my amusement and not much else. Occasionally someone will bring up a good point or a good article, but really to me you're all like talking furniture. Funny to see but not to be taken seriously

As I've often said, Chump's Presidency hasn't affected me negatively one bit and I've been the beneficiary of his idiotic tax cuts both directly and indirectly. Yet I'm still at the forefront of telling everyone that the entire GOP is an unredeemable treasonous money laundering cult. That makes me some sort of hero I guess.

[Slap Shot]

Re: 2020 Democrat Challengers Part II: There Can Be Only One

Question: is the vitriol directed at tD because of who he is or the job performance?

If he wasn't an awful human being he might have a better chance at selling his less than stellar job performance.

[Handyman]

Re: 2020 Democrat Challengers Part II: There Can Be Only One

Question: is the vitriol directed at tD because of who he is or the job performance?

Its both.

Why do you offer excuses for him?

[Kepler]

Re: 2020 Democrat Challengers Part II: There Can Be Only One

Question: is the vitriol directed at tD because of who he is or the job performance?

The consequences of his and his party's actions on human beings.

[BassAle]

Question: is the vitriol directed at tD because of who he is or the job performance?

He’s an incompetent moron that’s doing actual harm.

[trixR4kids]

Re: 2020 Democrat Challengers Part II: There Can Be Only One

How long will we continue to deny that the leading candidate for the Democratic nomination is simply a racist? https://t.co/Gu7xMHSHQP

— Mike Gravel (@MikeGravel) May 8, 2019

Might have to donate to Gravel’s campaign lol.

[duper]

Re: 2020 Democrat Challengers Part II: There Can Be Only One

Dems should have an easy time winning now. NY Times reporting Trump paid zero taxes from ~1985-~1995 and lost a billion dollars at the same time.

The emperor has never had any clothes.

Trump will probably be a 2-term President.


Excuse me while I go scrub myself clean after making that horrifying statement. I really hope I'm just being a pessimist, but by this time in 2016 it was clear to me that Trump was going to be the next President. I think he's getting a second term.

Question: is the vitriol directed at tD because of who he is or the job performance?

This question has always been stupid. The vitriol was never, ever about who he is. It was always, ALWAYS about his actions. He spent years pushing a debunked conspiracy theory about a photo-shopped birth certificate in a transparently racist attempt to discredit President Obama. (Of course, part of what made it transparently racist was the years he spent pushing for the execution of the legally exonerated Central Park 5.) Since then, the vitriol has gotten stronger and stronger, but always because he has said and done dumber, more dangerous, more hurtful, and more dishonest things. I don't understand how anyone can honeslty think it might be spite over who he is. Ignorance, bastardry, blindness, and massive self-delusion are the only reasons I can come up iwth why any person in this country still supports that walking piece of human filth.

[mookie1995]

How long will we continue to deny that the leading candidate for the Democratic nomination is simply a racist? https://t.co/Gu7xMHSHQP

— Mike Gravel (@MikeGravel) May 8, 2019

Might have to donate to Gravel’s campaign lol.

Maybe Joeb was making a case for reparations here

[mookie1995]

Trump will probably be a 2-term President.


Excuse me while I go scrub myself clean after making that horrifying statement. I really hope I'm just being a pessimist, but by this time in 2016 it was clear to me that Trump was going to be the next President. I think he's getting a second term.

Mookie chatting with folks from an embassy last night and was told their govt thinking is preparing for a 2nd term

[The Rube]

Re: 2020 Democrat Challengers Part II: There Can Be Only One

Trump will probably be a 2-term President.


Excuse me while I go scrub myself clean after making that horrifying statement. I really hope I'm just being a pessimist, but by this time in 2016 it was clear to me that Trump was going to be the next President. I think he's getting a second term.

Depends on if the Dems can sort out the 50 candidates that have declared. Solidify from the Bern Bros, and some fragments of the wannabes, and the people that don't wanna go full AOC style, Dems have it in the bag. Cut out the big steps, to make small steps. Easy victory. Win small, THEN go big. Don't try to get it all in one shot.

[trixR4kids]

Re: 2020 Democrat Challengers Part II: There Can Be Only One

Thanks Hillary

[The Rube]

Re: 2020 Democrat Challengers Part II: There Can Be Only One

Thanks Hillary

She had the burden of the Clinton legacy, like it or not. Add to that, "she was one o'dem womenfolk" and there was another strike, like it or not. The third strike was that some people wanted to eff DC up, and she was considered part of DC, Trump wasn't, like it or not.

This crop of Dem candidates, for the most part, don't have all three strikes against them before they start running. A few have two of them, but not all three.