Originally posted by ericredaxe
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
2020 Democrat Challengers Part II: There Can Be Only One
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
-
CCT '77 & '78
4 kids
5 grandsons (BCA 7/09, CJA 5/14, JDL 8/14, JFL 6/16, PJL 7/18)
1 granddaughter (EML 4/18)
”Any society that would give up a little liberty to gain a little security will deserve neither and lose both.”
- Benjamin Franklin
Banned from the St. Lawrence University Facebook page - March 2016 (But I got better).
I want to live forever. So far, so good.
-
Re: 2020 Democrat Challengers Part II: There Can Be Only One
Buttery Males would be a great name for a male revue targeting Republican women.
Though I guess most already do - can't quite imagine the womyn's studies crowd having the sense of humor (or gender preference)....If you don't change the world today, how can it be any better tomorrow?
Comment
-
Re: 2020 Democrat Challengers Part II: There Can Be Only One
Originally posted by LynahFan View PostButtery Males would be a great name for a male revue targeting Republican women.
Though I guess most already do - can't quite imagine the womyn's studies crowd having the sense of humor (or gender preference)....
It's possible that the PhD candidates are funny and the undergrads aren't, but that's probably true in every field.Last edited by Kepler; 05-04-2019, 11:23 AM.Cornell University
National Champion 1967, 1970
ECAC Champion 1967, 1968, 1969, 1970, 1973, 1980, 1986, 1996, 1997, 2003, 2005, 2010
Ivy League Champion 1966, 1967, 1968, 1969, 1970, 1971, 1972, 1973, 1977, 1978, 1983, 1984, 1985, 1996, 1997, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2012, 2014, 2018, 2019, 2020
Comment
-
Originally posted by Kepler View PostFrom my wife's gender studies friends I can tell you nobody has a better, more self-deprecating sense of humor about that stuff. They run circles around even our humor let alone the old, tired, sexist, deeply defensive jokes about them.
It's possible that the PhD candidates are funny and the undergrads aren't, but that's probably true in every field.a legend and an out of work bum look a lot alike, daddy.
Comment
-
Re: 2020 Democrat Challengers Part II: There Can Be Only One
Originally posted by mookie1995 View PostThose have GOT to be the easiest classes on earth. Study gendersCornell University
National Champion 1967, 1970
ECAC Champion 1967, 1968, 1969, 1970, 1973, 1980, 1986, 1996, 1997, 2003, 2005, 2010
Ivy League Champion 1966, 1967, 1968, 1969, 1970, 1971, 1972, 1973, 1977, 1978, 1983, 1984, 1985, 1996, 1997, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2012, 2014, 2018, 2019, 2020
Comment
-
Re: 2020 Democrat Challengers Part II: There Can Be Only One
The lack of awareness of how the GOP has starved the government to the point we don't have good transportation, or infrastructure is boggling. The fact that we cannot figure out how to pay for it while we have no problem handing buckets of cash to the rich is staggering.
The good news is when we elect the next pragmatist instead of a real mover and shaker we'll get nowhere all over again. This election is all about how GW wasn't so bad instead of what it needs to be about.**NOTE: The misleading post above was brought to you by Reynold's Wrap and American Steeples, makers of Crosses.
Originally Posted by dropthatpuck-Scooby's a lost cause.
Originally Posted by First Time, Long Time-Always knew you were nothing but a troll.
Comment
-
Re: 2020 Democrat Challengers Part II: There Can Be Only One
Originally posted by ScoobyDoo View PostThe lack of awareness of how the GOP has starved the government to the point we don't have good transportation, or infrastructure is boggling. The fact that we cannot figure out how to pay for it while we have no problem handing buckets of cash to the rich is staggering.
The good news is when we elect the next pragmatist instead of a real mover and shaker we'll get nowhere all over again. This election is all about how GW wasn't so bad instead of what it needs to be about.
That was a very specific choice by the GOP and they fooled their voters into going along with it. And even after the fact those voters have not caught on.Cornell University
National Champion 1967, 1970
ECAC Champion 1967, 1968, 1969, 1970, 1973, 1980, 1986, 1996, 1997, 2003, 2005, 2010
Ivy League Champion 1966, 1967, 1968, 1969, 1970, 1971, 1972, 1973, 1977, 1978, 1983, 1984, 1985, 1996, 1997, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2012, 2014, 2018, 2019, 2020
Comment
-
Originally posted by Kepler View PostIf you want to know where our roads and bridges went just look at the wealth of the top .01%
That was a very specific choice by the GOP and they fooled their voters into going along with it. And even after the fact those voters have not caught on.
Comment
-
Re: 2020 Democrat Challengers Part II: There Can Be Only One
Originally posted by trixR4kids View PostMy dad works as an exec for a construction firm that builds highways and it took him like 8+ years of Scott Walker not funding it to realize the guy is a fraud :facepalm:**NOTE: The misleading post above was brought to you by Reynold's Wrap and American Steeples, makers of Crosses.
Originally Posted by dropthatpuck-Scooby's a lost cause.
Originally Posted by First Time, Long Time-Always knew you were nothing but a troll.
Comment
-
Re: 2020 Democrat Challengers Part II: There Can Be Only One
Originally posted by ScoobyDoo View PostThe lack of awareness of how the GOP has starved the government to the point we don't have good transportation, or infrastructure is boggling. The fact that we cannot figure out how to pay for it while we have no problem handing buckets of cash to the rich is staggering.
https://streets.mn/2015/01/14/map-of...hway-spending/Go Gophers!
Comment
-
Re: 2020 Democrat Challengers Part II: There Can Be Only One
I don't think the coffers are barren per se but that's how the Republicans will portray it if they lose power. I'm fine with spending on smart things that improve the economy for the majority of the population but tax cuts that mostly benefit 1% of it clearly isn't accomplishing that. And the economy is better than it was in 2008 but most of the recovery didn't go to ordinary people and most of the jobs created during that time were either part time or contract work.Originally posted by 5mn_Major View Post
Comment
-
Re: 2020 Democrat Challengers Part II: There Can Be Only One
Originally posted by trixR4kids View PostI don't think the coffers are barren per se but that's how the Republicans will portray it if they lose power. I'm fine with spending on smart things that improve the economy for the majority of the population but tax cuts that mostly benefit 1% of it clearly isn't accomplishing that. And the economy is better than it was in 2008 but most of the recovery didn't go to ordinary people and most of the jobs created during that time were either part time or contract work.
And there comes the pragmatist to tell us he still doesn't understand progressive taxation.**NOTE: The misleading post above was brought to you by Reynold's Wrap and American Steeples, makers of Crosses.
Originally Posted by dropthatpuck-Scooby's a lost cause.
Originally Posted by First Time, Long Time-Always knew you were nothing but a troll.
Comment
Comment