Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

SCOTUS 14: Confirming a Rabid Partisan to Own the Libs

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by SJHovey View Post
    Wasn't Gorsuch a Kennedy disciple, though? I've always thought Colorado is a strange state. It's got that western feel and edge to it, but it's like it's populated by surfer dudes from Orange County.
    Gorsuch was a Scalia disciple. Kavanaugh clerked for Kennedy.

    Comment


    • Re: SCOTUS 14: Confirming a Rabid Partisan to Own the Libs

      Originally posted by unofan View Post
      Gorsuch was a Scalia disciple. Kavanaugh clerked for Kennedy.
      Oh, ok. I knew one of them was.
      That community is already in the process of dissolution where each man begins to eye his neighbor as a possible enemy, where non-conformity with the accepted creed, political as well as religious, is a mark of disaffection; where denunciation, without specification or backing, takes the place of evidence; where orthodoxy chokes freedom of dissent; where faith in the eventual supremacy of reason has become so timid that we dare not enter our convictions in the open lists, to win or lose.

      Comment


      • Re: SCOTUS 14: Confirming a Rabid Partisan to Own the Libs

        1st of the day, Alito with the drunk driving blood test case. Cops can almost always do it without a warrant. 5-4. As with most criminal procedural cases these days, Breyer sides with the conservatives and Gorsuch with the remaining liberals.

        Comment


        • Re: SCOTUS 14: Confirming a Rabid Partisan to Own the Libs

          Originally posted by unofan View Post
          As with most criminal procedural cases these days, Breyer sides with the conservatives and Gorsuch with the remaining liberals.
          What's up with that? Are they arguing about police powers, privacy, public interest, what?
          Cornell University
          National Champion 1967, 1970
          ECAC Champion 1967, 1968, 1969, 1970, 1973, 1980, 1986, 1996, 1997, 2003, 2005, 2010
          Ivy League Champion 1966, 1967, 1968, 1969, 1970, 1971, 1972, 1973, 1977, 1978, 1983, 1984, 1985, 1996, 1997, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2012, 2014, 2018, 2019, 2020

          Comment


          • Re: SCOTUS 14: Confirming a Rabid Partisan to Own the Libs

            Next up, from Roberts, are the gerrymandering cases. Such claims are political questions beyond the courts.

            AKA, gerrymandering is constitutional and it's up to voters to stop it.

            Comment


            • Re: SCOTUS 14: Confirming a Rabid Partisan to Own the Libs

              Originally posted by unofan View Post
              Next up, from Roberts, are the gerrymandering cases. Such claims are political questions beyond the courts.

              AKA, gerrymandering is constitutional and it's up to voters to stop it.
              Shock. 5-4?

              Does this mean all those court cases that nullified the gerrymandered maps get sh-tcanned?
              Cornell University
              National Champion 1967, 1970
              ECAC Champion 1967, 1968, 1969, 1970, 1973, 1980, 1986, 1996, 1997, 2003, 2005, 2010
              Ivy League Champion 1966, 1967, 1968, 1969, 1970, 1971, 1972, 1973, 1977, 1978, 1983, 1984, 1985, 1996, 1997, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2012, 2014, 2018, 2019, 2020

              Comment


              • Originally posted by Kepler View Post
                What's up with that? Are they arguing about police powers, privacy, public interest, what?
                Breyer has always been cop friendly. Scalia and now Gorsuch have been more skeptical.

                Comment


                • Re: SCOTUS 14: Confirming a Rabid Partisan to Own the Libs

                  Originally posted by unofan View Post
                  Next up, from Roberts, are the gerrymandering cases. Such claims are political questions beyond the courts.

                  AKA, gerrymandering is constitutional and it's up to voters to stop it.
                  He was on the Court when they decided Corporations were people, right?

                  This is bad.
                  **NOTE: The misleading post above was brought to you by Reynold's Wrap and American Steeples, makers of Crosses.

                  Originally Posted by dropthatpuck-Scooby's a lost cause.
                  Originally Posted by First Time, Long Time-Always knew you were nothing but a troll.

                  Comment


                  • Re: SCOTUS 14: Confirming a Rabid Partisan to Own the Libs

                    Gerrymandering was 5-4 along ideological lines. Kagan wrote the dissent.

                    Comment


                    • Re: SCOTUS 14: Confirming a Rabid Partisan to Own the Libs

                      Originally posted by unofan View Post
                      Scalia and now Gorsuch have been more skeptical.
                      Gubmint overreach?

                      Was Scalia the one who wrote the blistering opinion on cops using infrared to look inside homes for pot growing?
                      Cornell University
                      National Champion 1967, 1970
                      ECAC Champion 1967, 1968, 1969, 1970, 1973, 1980, 1986, 1996, 1997, 2003, 2005, 2010
                      Ivy League Champion 1966, 1967, 1968, 1969, 1970, 1971, 1972, 1973, 1977, 1978, 1983, 1984, 1985, 1996, 1997, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2012, 2014, 2018, 2019, 2020

                      Comment


                      • Re: SCOTUS 14: Confirming a Rabid Partisan to Own the Libs

                        Can't wait to be told the Courts don't matter again.
                        **NOTE: The misleading post above was brought to you by Reynold's Wrap and American Steeples, makers of Crosses.

                        Originally Posted by dropthatpuck-Scooby's a lost cause.
                        Originally Posted by First Time, Long Time-Always knew you were nothing but a troll.

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by Kepler View Post
                          Gubmint overreach?

                          Was Scalia the one who wrote the blistering opinion on cops using infrared to look inside homes for pot growing?
                          Yep.

                          Comment


                          • Re: SCOTUS 14: Confirming a Rabid Partisan to Own the Libs

                            Roberts still talking about gerrymandering. Likely Kagan will read from her dissent.

                            It also means Roberts has the citizenship question case, and the Indian case is either his or is going to be affirmed by an equally divided court.

                            Comment


                            • Re: SCOTUS 14: Confirming a Rabid Partisan to Own the Libs

                              So, gerrymandering is legal as long as you don’t do it enough to make it racial gerrymandering? Because that’s essentially the difference in today’s ruling versus the Virginia case, no?

                              This also means Michigan is screwed for 2020. New maps won’t go into effect until 2022 by the independent committee, so the current maps get to stay, locking Whitmer into a solidly red Congress for her term, essentially meaning nothing will get done.
                              Last edited by Spartanforlife4; 06-27-2019, 09:24 AM.
                              Go Green! Go White! Go State!

                              1966, 1986, 2007

                              Go Tigers, Go Packers, Go Red Wings, Go Pistons

                              Comment


                              • Re: SCOTUS 14: Confirming a Rabid Partisan to Own the Libs

                                Kagan now reading from her dissent.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X