Re: Science: Everything explained by PV=nRT, F=ma=Gm(1)•m(2)/r^2
No, but the whole equation is written to confuse the reader, hence the issue with the calculation.
It’s more an example of poor communication than it is of real math. Which is why you see more rigorous math have a very specific structure to remove as much confusion as possible.
No, but the whole equation is written to confuse the reader, hence the issue with the calculation.
It’s more an example of poor communication than it is of real math. Which is why you see more rigorous math have a very specific structure to remove as much confusion as possible.
Comment