RPI 2013/14 Part III: Maximum Overdrivel

[Beman]

I thought the new thread should have been Fear and Loathing on the way to LP. Especially after this weekend.

[Wicked Slappaahs]

Re: RPI 2013/14 Part III: Maximum Overdrivel

I get them on occasion, usually for strange reasons.



I try to be, but you should see me get angry when a car cuts me off when I am on a bike.

Ralph - you need to develop a mean streak and kick the car door and/or mirror. I'll get you signed up for a ride along with a bike messenger in Manhattan -they'll show you the ropes.

[Ralph Baer]

Re: RPI 2013/14 Part III: Maximum Overdrivel

You can negrep Ralph? :O

Ralph - you need to develop a mean streak and kick the car door and/or mirror. I'll get you signed up for a ride along with a bike messenger in Manhattan -they'll show you the ropes.

around my neck?

[Ralph Baer]

Re: RPI 2013/14 Part III: Maximum Overdrivel

lugnut,

You haven't posted a certain link yet on this thread.

[Got 6, Want More]

Re: RPI 2013/14 Part III: Maximum Overdrivel

Ralph, that was a mistake. I'd never neg rep you on purpose. I'd counterbalance it with pos rep but can't. I certainly wouldn't compare you to that guy. I generally don't use rep at all, but in this case someone else deserved it. Sorry R.B.

[Ralph Baer]

Re: RPI 2013/14 Part III: Maximum Overdrivel

Ralph, that was a mistake. I'd never neg rep you on purpose. I'd counterbalance it with pos rep but can't. I certainly wouldn't compare you to that guy. I generally don't use rep at all, but in this case someone else deserved it. Sorry R.B.

I'll accept that. Don't worry about repping me back. Several others have done so in response.

[Got 6, Want More]

Re: RPI 2013/14 Part III: Maximum Overdrivel

I'll accept that. Don't worry about repping me back. Several others have done so in reponse.

Good! Well-deserved. You are a senior statesman around here.

[FlagDUDE08]

Re: RPI 2013/14 Part III: Maximum Overdrivel

My early vote for a title for the Part IV thread: any title that does not contain the letters d, r, i, v, e, and l in that order.

RPI IV: Haggs: Daring to vote flat-out

[lugnut92]

Re: RPI 2013/14 Part III: Maximum Overdrivel

Sorry, it's been kind of overshadowed.

Today is January 28, 2014. There are 5 players ahead of Ryan Haggerty. Did you vote todaywithin the last 24 hours?

Vote HERE.

Everyone ahead of him is ahead by at least 4,000 votes, so this is likely as high as he goes, but there are a couple players close behind, so we can't stop now.

[FlagDUDE08]

Re: RPI 2013/14 Part III: Maximum Overdrivel

And in case anyone thought the reporting of Diebold as ECAC Goalie of the Week was premature, it's official now. http://www.ecachockey.com/men/2013-1..._Weekly_Awards

[RPI_2003]

Re: RPI 2013/14 Part III: Maximum Overdrivel

And in case anyone thought the reporting of Diebold as ECAC Goalie of the Week was premature, it's official now. http://www.ecachockey.com/men/2013-1..._Weekly_Awards

Well deserved!

[ibanezist00]

Re: RPI 2013/14 Part III: Maximum Overdrivel

From the TweeterVerse:

Perry Laskaris @PerryLaskaris 29m
@without_a_peer Schroeder has a two-minute minor and 5 & 10 for a questionable boarding call in 63 games. Neal has four minors in 75 gms.

Without a Peer @without_a_peer 37m
In 88 games in an RPI uniform, Jacob Laliberte has taken a total of two penalties for four minutes. #LadyByngCandidate


Yeah, RPI and all those classless goons!

(Mostly just wanted to post in the thread to get the green arrow going for the future )

[lugnut92]

Re: RPI 2013/14 Part III: Maximum Overdrivel

Today is January 29, 2014. There are 5 players ahead of Ryan Haggerty. Did you vote todaywithin the last 24 hours?

Vote HERE.

[Red Cloud]

Re: RPI 2013/14 Part III: Maximum Overdrivel

[COLOR="#ED1C2E"]Today is January 29, 2014. There are 5 players ahead of Ryan Haggerty. Did you vote todaywithin the last 24 hours?

No.

[RPI_2003]

Re: RPI 2013/14 Part III: Maximum Overdrivel

Today is January 29, 2014. There are 5 players ahead of Ryan Haggerty. Did you vote todaywithin the last 24 hours?

Vote HERE.

Yes.