This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways.
Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar.
We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.
I just say "if accurate" as these days anyone can print anything - I have no reason to doubt it. So yes - if the new language closes a loophole that is great - I suspect the intention of the prior language was to be exactly as you describe. From a curiosity perspective, I'd be curious to know...
What’s also ironic is that the most “pro life” people (I prefer anti-choice as the term) are also the most against sex education etc that could actually reduce unwanted pregnancy.
So you think the amended Mass law is too restrictive? (Note: I’m about as pro choice a it gets, but I can understand and acknowledge third trimester discussions)
(Also note - in practice I have no idea how many, if any, happen in the third trimester for non-medical reasons)
It doesn't really seem like it although it is easy to be unreasonable on the internet. I'd guess if we were all in a room watching hockey and talking politics we would find us all pretty reasonable.
If accurate I wonder what about that would not have met the medical exemptions. 🤷. Perhaps the change is more than symbolic so great, it just reads like a distinction without a difference to my non-lawyer eye.
As to your prior question about reasonable restrictions, I think most reasonable...
What would be a condition that would meet the “discretion of the physician” that is also not a life, physical or mental health situation)? From my quick look up it appears the prior law also had exceptions for fetal health conditions as well, not just the mothers.
The clinic/hospital change...
I have not read the changes. I'm very much pro-choice. With that said i don't think it is unreasonable to have some guidelines and restrictions in the later stages .
Edit: Just read it - seems largely symbolic. Changed from "exceptions for life, physical and mental health of the mother" to...
The stupidity knows no bounds:
https://www.msn.com/en-us/health/general/trump-signs-order-to-reduce-childhood-vaccines-repeats-unfounded-autism-link/ar-AA29NNv0?ocid=BingNewsSerp
*** Cue Aparch or Rufus talking about how I'm really a republican trump supporter
On the flip side, to use your analogy, I say “I’m not paying $2,500” … then you immediately respond “why would you only pay $1,500!??!?!?!! You must be a cheapskate”. (Without ever considering that maybe $2000 is the right price)
Right - I suspect the vast majority of this board is solidly middle class… as to some of your other comments, not sure where i said I supported trickle down economics or would be against additional legislation regarding gun control etc?
And also not sure what it has to do with my point that...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.