What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

UNH- How Far West Do We Go?

And to elaborate, Rookie of the Weak was part of a spin on Milk Carton Missing Kids by a BC pinhead poster whose screen name was something like BobF, IIRC. Maybe Nick P will clarify.
Not 100% sure, but I think it was SteveF (or FSteve as some of those he annoyed lovingly referred to him). Sadly, I believe SteveF has passed. Nick will sort this out once he gets here later this week, what with the big UNH-BC clash just over the horizon now. Back in the day, the week before these games was must-read USCHO time. And I know this fact will bend some minds on here, but well into the Umile Era, UNH actually held an overall winning record over BC. Debates often tended to gravitate towards which program had the worst post-season record. UNH actually beat BC in postseason games back in the mid-'90's, until Coach York built BC into the dominant program that enjoyed its peak years after the turn of the century. But even into the early part of those years, I believe UNH still had a (very narrow) lead in the overall series with BC. I haven't looked it up recently, but I'm guessing it's now at least a +20 for BC in that series.
 
It was good to see the team respond to the timeout, but a lot too late. This team is not good enough to go down 4-1 and comeback.

This team needs to play basic hockey. Make good passes, break out of the zone and control the puck. When they did this later in the game they had sustained pressure that resulted in a ton of A+ changes, just had some bad puck luck and did not get the bounces.

They can't be curling around the net and trying to make moves out front, which was the demise of this game when Oliver did that. Also our D is slow, the 2 on 1's given up last night were plentiful and this hung Whale out to dry. None of the goals were his fault and I believe the switch was a team message not an indication on his play.

And probably the most infuriating thing of the night was the NU student section who were in the lower section just off of the UNH bench and stood the entire game. That meant anyone in two sections behind the bench could not see half the zone. I get Walter Brown is a dump and small but there were plenty of sections 100% open where they could have stood and not blocked everyone's view. At least tickets were free
I wondered where you went! Agree on all points...when the dog house was chanting 'let's go huskies' we were chanting 'homeless Huskies' 🤣🤣🤣
 
Not 100% sure, but I think it was SteveF (or FSteve as some of those he annoyed lovingly referred to him). Sadly, I believe SteveF has passed. Nick will sort this out once he gets here later this week, what with the big UNH-BC clash just over the horizon now. Back in the day, the week before these games was must-read USCHO time. And I know this fact will bend some minds on here, but well into the Umile Era, UNH actually held an overall winning record over BC. Debates often tended to gravitate towards which program had the worst post-season record. UNH actually beat BC in postseason games back in the mid-'90's, until Coach York built BC into the dominant program that enjoyed its peak years after the turn of the century. But even into the early part of those years, I believe UNH still had a (very narrow) lead in the overall series with BC. I haven't looked it up recently, but I'm guessing it's now at least a +20 for BC in that series.
Yes, I think that you are correct about the author of the Milk Carton missing-in-action opposition players being SteveF I thought that his posts were incredibly creative and very funny. R.I.P., SteveF.
 
While I agree it is likely time to move on from MS7, do we trust the AD to make the right decision on hiring the new coach? The process for hiring the new football coach didn’t inspire a lot of confidence in me, and I think former coach Mac played a HEAVY hand with picking Goldrich, despite his never being a HC prior, even an OC/DC… I didn’t really buy in to the “national search” that was supposedly undertaken. I would be really interested to hear who else was on that “list”, if it is ever released (likely we will never find out). Don’t get me wrong, I wish Goldrich all the best, as I have some very fond memories watching him lead UNH football to some of their best years in recent time. Still, I find it hard to believe there weren’t more qualified candidates with a longer track record as coaches.
That's why I mentioned Jimmy T as the guy who is likely gonna have to lead that process. Umile had his chance a decade ago, and we are where we are due to his "prowess" in determining a quality successor. Having a little more insight today into MS7's background than I have previously, I can better understand the pressure Umile might have felt in recommending his former player over other more experienced candidates. I'll just leave that comment where it is, at least for now.

FWIW I don't doubt for a second there may have been a "national search", but not in the way you usually think of that term. With the money surrounding many of the college football head coaching jobs out there these days, I very much doubt UNH was gonna attract anyone other than Goodrich or someone else like him, with the same overall coaching profile and experience (or lack thereof). Experienced guys at this level are only a good season or two away from bigger salaries at the next level (see Santos and the Ivies), and guys who can piece together a winning resume at that next level are only a good season or two away from being the next Curt Cignetti and eight figure long term contracts. The pool for guys looking at UNH Football isn't especially experienced or deep as we might otherwise think it should be.

If the same logic follows with hockey, I presume Umile would be leaned on heavily to help with this process, and I think he again would look to one of his former players. The closest that comes to mind is Ayers, who has been with BC for 12-13(?) years now, and also had coaching experience before then. Not sure of any other UNH alumni in the coaching field (at any level) but I think that would be the lowest hanging fruit to pick from.
The difference between Umile and MacDonnell is that the latter - who presumably had some say in the selection of Santos as his successor - actually made a recommendation that didn't sink his former program like Umile did. Santos may not have had his teams perennially in the playoffs, but they did get there a few times, and for the most part his teams weren't that far removed from most of MacDonnell's teams. If only Umile had made an "almost as good" coach his successor ... instead, we went from an over the hill guy who did have a roadmap to (if not through) the postseason, to an underqualified guy who doesn't have a map beyond the first MBPBEGAM round into the slightest semblance of a real postseason. So Umile's feedback sadly must be tolerated at most, and any real feedback MUST come from Tortorella as the so-called GM of UNH Hockey. He could do worse than hire himself and two new associate coaches, but my hope would either be a Coach Boguniecki/Coach Ayers type with a pair of new assistants to freshen up the place, or to go the route of the experienced assistant from afar (as in Coach Barr) who would bring instant credibility to the program. But every year we wait for some miracle to happen with the current HC is a wasted year for the program, and digs the hole ever deeper.
 
Yeah, I suspect that ship has sailed, if ever there was a ship to be sailed on this issue. Trying to track MS7's roster construction planning certainly hasn't been an easy task, and I get that things have changed in recent years. Gone are the days of Umile and Lassonde's goalie conveyor belt with regular intervals, that's for sure.
(y)
 
UNH cannot fire and hire a successor to Souza unless it first does a complete evaluation of its future in HE and as a D1 hockey program. It’s a program that is far behind in many ways. Facilities , NIL funding, funding to match at least the median of HE programs are all lacking.

The New Hampshire hillbilly approach (let someone from Massachusetts pay my share because that’s my way life) is not going to cut it. If UNH isn’t going to properly fund its program leaving Hockey Easy makes sense.
 
UNH cannot fire and hire a successor to Souza unless it first does a complete evaluation of its future in HE and as a D1 hockey program. It’s a program that is far behind in many ways. Facilities , NIL funding, funding to match at least the median of HE programs are all lacking.

The New Hampshire hillbilly approach (let someone from Massachusetts pay my share because that’s my way life) is not going to cut it. If UNH isn’t going to properly fund its program leaving Hockey Easy makes sense.
I don't usually follow along with your posts (I'll let you guys do your battles!), except maybe for the rare one that has to do with UNH hockey. But this regular mantra has me scratching my head cuz if there's a correleation between state funding (Mass being wealthy beyond measure, especially in comparison to hillbilly NH) and D-1 athletic "success", how do you reconcile the UMASS football program, currently crapping itself in D-1 with an embarrassing, aggregate 18-94 W/L record over the recent decade, 0-12 this past season?
 
I don't usually follow along with your posts (I'll let you guys do your battles!), except maybe for the rare one that has to do with UNH hockey. But this regular mantra has me scratching my head cuz if there's a correleation between state funding (Mass being wealthy beyond measure, especially in comparison to hillbilly NH) and D-1 athletic "success", how do you reconcile the UMASS football program, currently crapping itself in D-1 with an embarrassing, aggregate 18-94 W/L record over the recent decade, 0-12 this past season?
Great question. There was never a demand for D 1 football at UMass nor has there EVER been any commitment from the state. That’s why it’s failing
 
That's why I mentioned Jimmy T as the guy who is likely gonna have to lead that process. Umile had his chance a decade ago, and we are where we are due to his "prowess" in determining a quality successor. Having a little more insight today into MS7's background than I have previously, I can better understand the pressure Umile might have felt in recommending his former player over other more experienced candidates. I'll just leave that comment where it is, at least for now.

FWIW I don't doubt for a second there may have been a "national search", but not in the way you usually think of that term. With the money surrounding many of the college football head coaching jobs out there these days, I very much doubt UNH was gonna attract anyone other than Goodrich or someone else like him, with the same overall coaching profile and experience (or lack thereof). Experienced guys at this level are only a good season or two away from bigger salaries at the next level (see Santos and the Ivies), and guys who can piece together a winning resume at that next level are only a good season or two away from being the next Curt Cignetti and eight figure long term contracts. The pool for guys looking at UNH Football isn't especially experienced or deep as we might otherwise think it should be.


The difference between Umile and MacDonnell is that the latter - who presumably had some say in the selection of Santos as his successor - actually made a recommendation that didn't sink his former program like Umile did. Santos may not have had his teams perennially in the playoffs, but they did get there a few times, and for the most part his teams weren't that far removed from most of MacDonnell's teams. If only Umile had made an "almost as good" coach his successor ... instead, we went from an over the hill guy who did have a roadmap to (if not through) the postseason, to an underqualified guy who doesn't have a map beyond the first MBPBEGAM round into the slightest semblance of a real postseason. So Umile's feedback sadly must be tolerated at most, and any real feedback MUST come from Tortorella as the so-called GM of UNH Hockey. He could do worse than hire himself and two new associate coaches, but my hope would either be a Coach Boguniecki/Coach Ayers type with a pair of new assistants to freshen up the place, or to go the route of the experienced assistant from afar (as in Coach Barr) who would bring instant credibility to the program. But every year we wait for some miracle to happen with the current HC is a wasted year for the program, and digs the hole ever deeper.
A good friend of mine says this about being in a hole...simple...stop digging! Good point all around. Seems this convo comes up almost on a yearly basis and the interesting part is nothing changes.

That said I wish the team well going forward. I think if you were there Sunday the intensity was there most of the game. Had some decent chances. Yeah mistakes were made as Norbert pointed out. Was glad Cy got the 'scoring monkey ' off his back hope it continues.

Kudos to NU for their sweep. Oh and in the event you need a place to hold a first round HE game....
UNH cannot fire and hire a successor to Souza unless it first does a complete evaluation of its future in HE and as a D1 hockey program. It’s a program that is far behind in many ways. Facilities , NIL funding, funding to match at least the median of HE programs are all lacking.

The New Hampshire hillbilly approach (let someone from Massachusetts pay my share because that’s my way life) is not going to cut it. If UNH isn’t going to properly fund its program leaving Hockey
 
UNH cannot fire and hire a successor to Souza unless it first does a complete evaluation of its future in HE and as a D1 hockey program. It’s a program that is far behind in many ways. Facilities , NIL funding, funding to match at least the median of HE programs are all lacking.

The New Hampshire hillbilly approach (let someone from Massachusetts pay my share because that’s my way life) is not going to cut it. If UNH isn’t going to properly fund its program leaving Hockey Easy makes sense.

After my last post on this topic where I referenced pulling the MIT technology hub out, what it would do to the Massachusetts economy, I did some further thinking along that line.

You like to point to "let someone from Massachusetts pay my share" because you apparently have something up your @ss about NH. Your angle over and over is about Mass Tax Policy and funding of Universities and that commitment driving the economy. Remember your flippant BS that UNH has never contributed anything, which I debunked without doing research?

Well Massachusetts taxes funding universities is not what is driving the Boston (entire regions) economy. That inside 128 or inside 495 economic engine is primarily driven by MIT and Harvard. This is why NSFs latest technology program is called "NSF Engines" they are actively trying to create the MIT/Stanford/Research Triangle economic engine model in other places, like Chicago.

If we look in the Boston metro there are 40 colleges and universities. The 6 majors (MIT, Harvard, BU, BC, NU, Tufts) are all private, not Mass State funded. The only state funded locations inside that innovation hub is Umass Boston, MassArt, 5 community colleges and 3 "States" (Framingham, Bridgewater and Salem), those 10 definitely not the drivers, maybe not even passengers. This basically makes your taxation argument a load of crap, which we all already knew. NOTE: I still believe the best investment a society can make in its own future is education particularly in STEM fields.

Like everybody else, yes, UNH is going to need to find some donors. This is true for ALL - you still haven't found one good example. Your last 3 were crap, which I also debunked.

There is a miniscule chance that UNH leaves Hockey East or D1 Hockey at this point. They will replace the (incompetent) coach first and probably run through at least a couple more before this is even considered.

Unfortunately my faith in the UNH Admin is limited, I still think (sadly) it is a coin flip if MS7 can convince them he is on the right track and just needs a little more time.
 
Last edited:
I think if you were there Sunday the intensity was there most of the game. Had some decent chances. Yeah mistakes were made as Norbert pointed out. Was glad Cy got the 'scoring monkey ' off his back hope it continues.
It's great to hear there was intensity shown by the players. Unfortunately, nothing leads more quickly to frustration than intensity of effort which is not properly channeled into skills development and an effective framework for successful team play by the able hands of competent coaching.

There are many ways to accomplish either, and those who can do both are the best in their respective fields. Watch Curt Cignetti's Indiana Hoosiers do their thing tonight. He is your modern-day Vince Lombardi in the making, totally unafraid to say things out loud. You can be great if you know your job, and how to communicate ... and as the great man on the precipice of an all-time legendary season just said. "You don't go to war on warm milk and cookies" ...

 
That's why I mentioned Jimmy T as the guy who is likely gonna have to lead that process. Umile had his chance a decade ago, and we are where we are due to his "prowess" in determining a quality successor. Having a little more insight today into MS7's background than I have previously, I can better understand the pressure Umile might have felt in recommending his former player over other more experienced candidates. I'll just leave that comment where it is, at least for now.

FWIW I don't doubt for a second there may have been a "national search", but not in the way you usually think of that term. With the money surrounding many of the college football head coaching jobs out there these days, I very much doubt UNH was gonna attract anyone other than Goodrich or someone else like him, with the same overall coaching profile and experience (or lack thereof). Experienced guys at this level are only a good season or two away from bigger salaries at the next level (see Santos and the Ivies), and guys who can piece together a winning resume at that next level are only a good season or two away from being the next Curt Cignetti and eight figure long term contracts. The pool for guys looking at UNH Football isn't especially experienced or deep as we might otherwise think it should be.


The difference between Umile and MacDonnell is that the latter - who presumably had some say in the selection of Santos as his successor - actually made a recommendation that didn't sink his former program like Umile did. Santos may not have had his teams perennially in the playoffs, but they did get there a few times, and for the most part his teams weren't that far removed from most of MacDonnell's teams. If only Umile had made an "almost as good" coach his successor ... instead, we went from an over the hill guy who did have a roadmap to (if not through) the postseason, to an underqualified guy who doesn't have a map beyond the first MBPBEGAM round into the slightest semblance of a real postseason. So Umile's feedback sadly must be tolerated at most, and any real feedback MUST come from Tortorella as the so-called GM of UNH Hockey. He could do worse than hire himself and two new associate coaches, but my hope would either be a Coach Boguniecki/Coach Ayers type with a pair of new assistants to freshen up the place, or to go the route of the experienced assistant from afar (as in Coach Barr) who would bring instant credibility to the program. But every year we wait for some miracle to happen with the current HC is a wasted year for the program, and digs the hole ever deeper.
I can agree with this sentiment - especially with football it is difficult at the FCS level - if they show a high level of success they will soon get poached by an FBS program for more money, resources, etc. By going with an alum I imagine UNH is trying to go for the “friends and family” discount, and perhaps greater loyalty to stay, even if they start showing success. This did not work out for Santos, but Coach Mac stayed for a LONG time, despite long-term success in the regular season and postseason (to an extent). While I don’t know for sure, I imagine he had opportunities when he was younger to leave to bigger programs, but he remained loyal to UNH until his retirement.

Anyways, back to hockey, I can only hope Jimmy T would lead the search. His network (I presume) is pretty big, maybe larger than that of Umile/AD Rich. If UNH completely falls flat the rest of the way (1-2 more wins), finishes 10/11th in HE, and is one and done in the playoffs, I think it’s a very compelling case to move on from MS7 at seasons end.

Again, IF this happens (and I really hope it doesn’t) I foresee this playing out in one of a few ways:

1.) Given MS7 still has one year left on his contract, AD Rich lets him finish out his contract, hoping for better results next year. (Exactly WHAT is considered “better” is up for debate. For me, I’d need to AT LEAST a trip to the garden. Anything less is not good enough.)

2.) AD Rich has seen enough at seasons end after 2 dismal seasons in a row after she joined UNH, and after she handed out the 3 year contract. She buys out MS7s last year, BUT perhaps due to limited funds to immediately higher a new coach for the fall, she appoints Jimmy T as the “interim” coach, maintaining Stewie/Guiliano as assistants. Jimmy T conducts a year long national search to find the new UNH coach, who is hired after MS7s contract officially ends in spring 2027.

3.) same as (2), but she decides to forgo the interim year with a Jimmy T, and hires someone new for Fall 2026. MS7 will get buyout for last year or contract.

in my mind, the order or liklihood is 1>3>2. I think an interim coach for a year would be very disruptive for recruiting and the existing players - many of whom will probably want to jump ship and go elsewhere. At the same time, I think UNH admin would push VERY STRONGLY to avoid a buyout / dead money…

Curious to hear what others thoughts are. Again, the hope is the ship gets righted this weekend vs BC, and we finish in the top half of HE with perhaps a trip to the Garden. ALOT has to change on the ice though for that to become a reality.

Forever optimistic…
 
After my last post on this topic where I referenced pulling the MIT technology hub out, what it would do to the Massachusetts economy, I did some further thinking along that line.

You like to point to "let someone from Massachusetts pay my share" because you apparently have something up your @ss about NH. Your angle over and over is about Mass Tax Policy and funding of Universities and that commitment driving the economy. Remember your flippant BS that UNH has never contributed anything, which I debunked without doing research?

Well Massachusetts taxes funding universities is not what is driving the Boston (entire regions) economy. That inside 128 or inside 495 economic engine is primarily driven by MIT and Harvard. This is why NSFs latest technology program is called "NSF Engines" they are actively trying to create the MIT/Stanford/Research Triangle economic engine model in other places, like Chicago.

If we look in the Boston metro there are 40 colleges and universities. The 6 majors (MIT, Harvard, BU, BC, NU, Tufts) are all private, not Mass State funded. The only state funded locations inside that innovation hub is Umass Boston, MassArt, 5 community colleges and 3 "States" (Framingham, Bridgewater and Salem), those 10 definitely not the drivers, maybe not even passengers. This basically makes your taxation argument a load of crap, which we all already knew. NOTE: I still believe the best investment a society can make in its own future is education particularly in STEM fields.

Like everybody else, yes, UNH is going to need to find some donors. This is true for ALL - you still haven't found one good example. Your last 3 were crap, which I also debunked.

There is a miniscule chance that UNH leaves Hockey East or D1 Hockey at this point. They will replace the (incompetent) coach first and probably run through at least a couple more before this is even considered.

Unfortunately my faith in the UNH Admin is limited, I still think (sadly) it is a coin flip if MS7 can convince them he is on the right track and just needs a little more time.
Elwood, I love your ambition but the quality of research is only as good as the person that does it. And you’re, well, lacking.

You realize that the “private” colleges are tax exempt? Have you ever thought about what that means? Doubtful. You realize the Boston Hospitals, which are for treating and research hospitals, are tax exempt?

Please don’t ever compare the educational system and economies of Massachusetts and NH. Please don’t compare the funding of UMass with UNH. Just don’t even try.

Btw, lol on you debunking me. You don’t have anywhere near the capacity. But I do love your enthusiasm!
 
Elwood, I love your ambition but the quality of research is only as good as the person that does it. And you’re, well, lacking.

You realize that the “private” colleges are tax exempt? Have you ever thought about what that means? Doubtful. You realize the Boston Hospitals, which are for treating and research hospitals, are tax exempt?

Please don’t ever compare the educational system and economies of Massachusetts and NH. Please don’t compare the funding of UMass with UNH. Just don’t even try.

Btw, lol on you debunking me. You don’t have anywhere near the capacity. But I do love your enthusiasm!
Please post anything worth while, something thoughtful.

Mass state income tax still applies to employees (60% + of Mass Revenue)
Mass state sales tax still applies to employees (22% + of Mass Revenue)
Mass state property tax.... wait there isn't one... hmmm

Yes Universities as non profits are tax exempt your right like hospitals, churches, charitable orgs etc. (good job pointing out the obvious) like in all States. What it means is they don't contribute taxes like corporations, because they aren't, corporations provide less than 10% of total Mass Revenue. Mass like most states provides corporate entities lots of ways to not pay taxes, why because the State wants corporations for jobs (politics is all about jobs) and makes most of its money off individuals. When you refer to State support of Universities you know you aren't referring to "tax exempt", you were referring to State direct funding to the Universities. When you complain about NH not supporting UNH and leaching of Mass economy you have been implying that Mass funding Universities has been driving Mass economy, when it is really 2 private universities driving the entire region.

Honestly I don't want to call you stupid or a dope but you make it hard.
 
Last edited:
Elwood, I love your ambition but the quality of research is only as good as the person that does it. And you’re, well, lacking.

You realize that the “private” colleges are tax exempt? Have you ever thought about what that means? Doubtful. You realize the Boston Hospitals, which are for treating and research hospitals, are tax exempt?

Please don’t ever compare the educational system and economies of Massachusetts and NH. Please don’t compare the funding of UMass with UNH. Just don’t even try.

Btw, lol on you debunking me. You don’t have anywhere near the capacity. But I do love your enthusiasm!
When you tax free, which ones are you referring too? There isn’t a 100% exclusion from taxes so thinking there is a windfall of extra cash is inaccurate
 
Please post anything worth while, something thoughtful.

Mass state income tax still applies to employees (60% + of Mass Revenue)
Mass state sales tax still applies to employees (22% + of Mass Revenue)
Mass state property tax.... wait there isn't one... hmmm

Yes Universities as non profits are tax exempt your right like hospitals, churches, charitable orgs etc. (good job pointing out the obvious) like in all States. What it means is they don't contribute taxes like corporations, because they aren't, corporations provide less than 10% of total Mass Revenue. Mass like most states provides corporate entities lots of ways to not pay taxes, why because the State wants corporations for jobs (politics is all about jobs) and makes most of its money off individuals.

Honestly I don't want to call you stupid or a dope but you make it hard.
Not all properties of a hospital are tax exempt. Not all taxes of a church are exempt from taxes depending on use but I’m sure Potty will try and argue the opposite being the smartest in the room.
 
Yes Universities as non profits are tax exempt your right like hospitals, churches, charitable orgs etc. (good job pointing out the obvious) like in all States. What it means is they don't contribute taxes like corporations, because they aren't, corporations provide less than 10% of total Mass Revenue. Mass like most states provides corporate entities lots of ways to not pay taxes, why because the State wants corporations for jobs (politics is all about jobs) and makes most of its money off individuals.
It's had to train a chimp to juggle.... What's obvious about you is your ignorance. And I'm being VERY kind.

Ummm, property taxes? Private colleges don't pay them. NH residents complain about property taxes all day every day. Of course, they complain about paying for anything. Harvard, MIT, BC, BU, Northeastern and the Boston hospitals pay no property taxes for some of the most valuable property in the country. You do understand that means others assume the lost revenue through other forms of taxation? Oops, you're Elwood, you wouldn't.

The fact that you don't understand how taxes work at all says so much about your "way of life" in the woods with Buford.
 
Back
Top