... so I see the "woke mob" has arrived with the PC police in tow. Boy oh boy, another sign of the times.
Out of total curiosity (since, contrary to apparent conventional wisdom on this thread, I did NOT coin the phrase, but admittedly did immediately adopt it, and will probably stick to it now that I've done the research) ... I put the term "sugar britches definition" in Microsoft Bing today. It came back with two explanations/definitions:
(1) a woman who uses men to further her primary motive; OR
(2) a (sexist?) term of endearment that means "sweet pants"
IIRC there was a colorful post in the aftermath of MS7's apparent extension where said poster postulated that our AD was intent on building up her credentials within the university, OR for a bigger/better post at some undetermined alternate school in the future. Poster's conclusion IIRC was basically that, in signing MS7 for his latest (undeserved) contract, she would "own" him (and his apparent benefactor TDL) from this point forward. If you read the first definition that Bing provides for the term ... clearly there is a close match to the alleged conduct.
I have no interest whatsoever in the second description. I'm talking about the job performance of a highly-paid AD, a UNH administrator who is thrust into the public realm when discussing her staffing decisions as they pertain to her highest profile underlings. I think I've been fair and supportive of her decision last year in Men's Hoops, and I'm withholding judgment on her decision to replace Coach Hubbard (Men's Soccer). Like many of you, I think her decision on Men's Hockey is either influenced by TDL and/or other donors weighing in on MS7's behalf, OR her not truly understanding the place of Men's Hockey (or Women's Hockey) at the fore of UNH Athletics. If the AD cannot handle silly nicknames on a college hockey message board, maybe she's not up to the job in the first place? God knows, I leveled withering sarcastic criticism at her (male) predecessor(s) for at least a decade on here. I'm pretty sure Blue Skies and his second-in-command Nigel survived.
Someone asked the question, "What if that is how they referred to your wife or daughter at work?" If my wife or daughter was paid on the order of a quarter million bucks annually to be the face of the U, and make public decisions that impact teams that are followed by tens of thousands of fans who either buy tickets or otherwise invest their time, money and resources in the U, I'd probably tell them "comes with the territory". Rich could have stayed in Princeton as the anonymous second-in-command, and attend an endless stream of compliance-related conferences with her fellow legal-eagle sports admins, keep her head low, and avoid the limelight. But she wanted more, and more she has gotten. And when the AD messes up the single biggest decision she is ever likely to have in her UNH career before she probably ups and leaves for greener pastures, she should have every expectation that she is gonna take some incoming flak. And with more than a few on here openly speculating about the possibility that her head was turned in the process by the lure of big dollar donors ... well, if the shoe fits, etc.
As an aside in closing ... it's pretty ironic to see some tut-tutting about reasons why some old posters have left, as we seem to pursue a goal of making the atmosphere on this thread (to say nothing of the overall forum) as antiseptic as UNH admins have turned The Whitt Experience into over the last decade-plus. "You suck" ... "bloody stumps" ... "Black Betty" ... all gone, but we're to believe the reason folks leave is because we haven't made things even more sterile, antiseptic ... and boring. As was put by Neil Peart over 40 years ago ...