What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

POTUS 45.65: I'm Just Here For The Lincoln Project Ads

Status
Not open for further replies.
He can try and trick everyone into thinking he has a shred of integrity but his legacy is and always will be Beer Boy. When history is written after the planet is destroyed and we're all fighting for water like a bunch of dogs the chapter on Republicans and Turtle Boy will be one of complete disdain, and disgust. They will write of how they used their political power to enrich their friends and destroy the planet.

And..............?
 
McConnell did not aim for integrity or legacy. He went for wealth. He is the pre-Dump GOP personified, while Dump of course is the post-Dump GOP personified.
 
McConnell did not aim for integrity or legacy. He went for wealth. He is the pre-Dump GOP personified, while Dump of course is the post-Dump GOP personified.

That tracks...

A slightly wet fart became the after effects of a night of binge drinking Busch Light and eating 4 lbs of Taco Bell..
 
Popehat on Twitter was saying, last night, that this judge wasn't really "helping" Trump so much as she was offering the required edits in order to proceed in any capacity. He said, heavily paraphrasing, that he's seen judges help council and it doesn't look like this; that this is more "could you have this filled out by someone who isn't a total fuckwit".
 
History doesn't change then end result. It just documents what happened.

And what people think 100 years from now does what for us, now, exactly?

Hard to say, "well derps, we wuz right after all" from the grave. Doesn't off me much comfort.
 
Popehat on Twitter was saying, last night, that this judge wasn't really "helping" Trump so much as she was offering the required edits in order to proceed in any capacity. He said, heavily paraphrasing, that he's seen judges help council and it doesn't look like this; that this is more "could you have this filled out by someone who isn't a total fuckwit".

Civil trial judges HATE sloppy and ambiguous pleadings and pretrial submissions, for a number or reasons. First, they hate being reversed. Unorganized and unclear plaintiff presentation makes for sloppy and extended trial requiring more judicial rulings and management, increased chances for appeal, and overall docket misery. That said, it's the plaintiff's burden, so judges can always use the burden of proof option after a poorly organized case presentation. That's why judges want good lawyers (and as few pro se cases as possible).
 
And what people think 100 years from now does what for us, now, exactly?

Hard to say, "well derps, we wuz right after all" from the grave. Doesn't off me much comfort.

There will be no comfort anywhere as the world burns. Future people will be Nero strumming their fiddle.
 
There will be no comfort anywhere as the world burns. Future people will be Nero strumming their fiddle.

We're Nero in this scenario.

The future people are the barbarians picking their noses in the rubble and wondering what the villa lavatories are for.
 
There will be no comfort anywhere as the world burns. Future people will be Nero strumming their fiddle.

At the rate we're going, the future will be a North American wasteland full of gangs and cult leaders who rule their tribes and everyone else through violence. An actual "Life Imitates Art" version of The Stand.
 
Popehat on Twitter was saying, last night, that this judge wasn't really "helping" Trump so much as she was offering the required edits in order to proceed in any capacity. He said, heavily paraphrasing, that he's seen judges help council and it doesn't look like this; that this is more "could you have this filled out by someone who isn't a total fuckwit".

Oh she isn't helping, she is just making sure he doesn't have an argument that he had ineffective counsel. (or any type of reversal) As soon as the motion is amended it is getting shot down faster than the fraud case where the lawyer admitted there was no fraud to the judge.
 
Oh she isn't helping, she is just making sure he doesn't have an argument that he had ineffective counsel. (or any type of reversal) As soon as the motion is amended it is getting shot down faster than the fraud case where the lawyer admitted there was no fraud to the judge.

Right, it came across to me as "I'm going to give you a chance to clarify all of your inane points so it becomes clear to everyone how inane they are so that this cannot get overturned on some broad technicality".
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top