Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

2009 MLB Playoffs

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • jmh
    replied
    Re: 2009 MLB Playoffs

    Wait... WHAT?

    Leave a comment:


  • mookie1995
    replied
    Re: 2009 MLB Playoffs

    game 3 of the '69 WS is on mlb network right now.

    i must admit i find the suitcoats and ties appealing attire.

    Leave a comment:


  • hockeyplayer1015
    replied
    Re: 2009 MLB Playoffs

    Originally posted by Terrierbyassociation View Post
    1. I doubt he's going to pitch on 2 days rest, but you're right we might see him for an inning if we see a Game 7.
    2. Well now's a good time to start, so having him pitch a meaningless ninth inning doesn't make much sense now.
    Game 7 would essentially be his bullpen throw day anyways, so he'd be available for an inning or 2, possibly 3 max.

    Leave a comment:


  • Terrierbyassociation
    replied
    Re: 2009 MLB Playoffs

    Originally posted by bronconick View Post
    1. Everyone's available on some level for a game 7 World Series

    2. Lee's never gone on short rest, from what I heard this morning.
    1. I doubt he's going to pitch on 2 days rest, but you're right we might see him for an inning if we see a Game 7.
    2. Well now's a good time to start, so having him pitch a meaningless ninth inning doesn't make much sense now.

    Leave a comment:


  • bronconick
    replied
    Re: 2009 MLB Playoffs

    Originally posted by Terrierbyassociation View Post
    So this is a surprise, Cliff Lee won't start Game 4 on short rest but will pitch Game 5 and obviously won't be available for Game 7.

    Guess that statsnerd Charlie Manuel forgot about pitch counts, letting Lee run it up to 122. Or maybe that was always his plan. If it was his plan to give Lee Games 1 and Games 5...then he's not maximizing Lee.
    1. Everyone's available on some level for a game 7 World Series

    2. Lee's never gone on short rest, from what I heard this morning.

    Leave a comment:


  • JF_Gophers
    replied
    Re: 2009 MLB Playoffs

    Originally posted by Terrierbyassociation View Post
    So this is a surprise, Cliff Lee won't start Game 4 on short rest but will pitch Game 5 and obviously won't be available for Game 7.

    Guess that statsnerd Charlie Manuel forgot about pitch counts, letting Lee run it up to 122. Or maybe that was always his plan. If it was his plan to give Lee Games 1 and Games 5...then he's not maximizing Lee.
    You obviously are overlooking one key thing. Manual knows his team will sweep at home, so Game 5 will be the last game of the series, thus maximizing Lee.

    Leave a comment:


  • Terrierbyassociation
    replied
    Re: 2009 MLB Playoffs

    So this is a surprise, Cliff Lee won't start Game 4 on short rest but will pitch Game 5 and obviously won't be available for Game 7.

    Guess that statsnerd Charlie Manuel forgot about pitch counts, letting Lee run it up to 122. Or maybe that was always his plan. If it was his plan to give Lee Games 1 and Games 5...then he's not maximizing Lee.

    Leave a comment:


  • The Paragon of Virtue
    replied
    Re: 2009 MLB Playoffs

    Originally posted by bronconick View Post
    I *thought* TBS did that for the play-in game between the Twins and Tigers, though I may be confusing it with something else, like the Red Wings games in Sweden.
    They used Caray and Darling for the Twins/Tigers game.

    Leave a comment:


  • Jon
    replied
    Re: 2009 MLB Playoffs

    Originally posted by bronconick View Post
    I *thought* TBS did that for the play-in game between the Twins and Tigers, though I may be confusing it with something else, like the Red Wings games in Sweden.
    Although TBS' aura of suck is so great that I started hating Don Orsillo at the end of the Sox/Angels series. Possibly because I was so enraged that I confused him with Papelbon. I'm sorry Don. But that was one too many games without Remy...

    Leave a comment:


  • bronconick
    replied
    Re: 2009 MLB Playoffs

    Originally posted by Jon View Post
    I really think they should have a guy from the Phillies booth, a guy from the Yankees booth and Craig Sager's Amazing Technicolor Dreamcoat and not use Buck and McCarver for anything more than target practice...
    I *thought* TBS did that for the play-in game between the Twins and Tigers, though I may be confusing it with something else, like the Red Wings games in Sweden.

    Leave a comment:


  • Jon
    replied
    Re: 2009 MLB Playoffs

    Originally posted by GreatLakerMohawk View Post
    Buck and McCarver spent all of Game 2 trying to make a mountain out of a molehill about Pedro, meanwhile conveniently ignoring the game A.J. Burnett was throwing. When Burnett struck out his ninth batter in the 7th, Buck finally, begrudgingly started to compliment the job he'd done.

    But Burnett isn't a storyline, Pedro is. What the f-ck ever. It kills me that we're blessed with such idiocy on Fox, TBS, and ESPN.
    I really think they should have a guy from the Phillies booth, a guy from the Yankees booth and Craig Sager's Amazing Technicolor Dreamcoat and not use Buck and McCarver for anything more than target practice...

    Leave a comment:


  • mookie1995
    replied
    Re: 2009 MLB Playoffs

    Originally posted by GreatLakerMohawk View Post
    Buck and McCarver spent all of Game 2 trying to make a mountain out of a molehill about Pedro, meanwhile conveniently ignoring the game A.J. Burnett was throwing. When Burnett struck out his ninth batter in the 7th, Buck finally, begrudgingly started to compliment the job he'd done.

    But Burnett isn't a storyline, Pedro is. What the f-ck ever. It kills me that we're blessed with such idiocy on Fox, TBS, and ESPN.
    did anyone else like the "pedro is so smart, even not on the mound..... AND THERE'S A DRIVE BY TEX-SHARE-AH!!!"

    Leave a comment:


  • SteveF
    replied
    Re: 2009 MLB Playoffs

    Originally posted by Jon View Post
    Given the way Yankee fans complain about their broadcasters, it really says a lot that the Fox people are just that annoying.
    its our radio broadcast that sucks.. and its really just waldman. sterling is a little corny on his homerun calls and obviously does the yankees win thing, but his play by play is otherwise very good and he is always very flattering of the other teams' performance and up to date on their season's success

    Leave a comment:


  • GreatLakerMohawk
    replied
    Re: 2009 MLB Playoffs

    Originally posted by Jon View Post
    Given the way Yankee fans complain about their broadcasters, it really says a lot that the Fox people are just that annoying.
    Buck and McCarver spent all of Game 2 trying to make a mountain out of a molehill about Pedro, meanwhile conveniently ignoring the game A.J. Burnett was throwing. When Burnett struck out his ninth batter in the 7th, Buck finally, begrudgingly started to compliment the job he'd done.

    But Burnett isn't a storyline, Pedro is. What the f-ck ever. It kills me that we're blessed with such idiocy on Fox, TBS, and ESPN.

    Leave a comment:


  • Jon
    replied
    Re: 2009 MLB Playoffs

    Originally posted by collegehcky2 View Post
    They make me miss Michael Kay, Paul O'Neill, David Cone and Al Leiter. Even though Kay could get annoying, the rest of the guys made up for it with their banter between each other. I really haven't laughed during a baseball game as much as I did when O'Neill brought his own milk to the radio booth because his wife wanted him to drink skim milk.
    Given the way Yankee fans complain about their broadcasters, it really says a lot that the Fox people are just that annoying.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X