Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

The Power of the SCOTUS II: "Release the Kagan!"

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Re: The Power of the SCOTUS II: "Release the Kagan!"

    Originally posted by FreshFish View Post
    This is one of those cases that leaves me going "huh? what?"

    If the AZ law is presented correctly in various news articles I've read, it merely instructs state officials to enforce federal law. The Administration didn't bother to change the federal law when they had filibuster-proof majorities and now they don't want the federal law enforced?

    One of the ironies is that the predecessor governor, Democrat Napolitano, is now Director of Homeland Security and while governor she declared a state of emergency in AZ over the very same issue.
    Yah, a lot of us in Arizona have been going "huh, what?" at the federal government on this subject for years. Should be interesting to see how the Supremes go on this. It's really a much bigger case than just AZ's immigration law, but rather one of those cases that will help define what, if anything, a state can do to address public safety needs.

    Napolitano's flip-flopping on immigration issues makes Romney look like a pillar of consistency.

    Not enforcing the border laws will help get Obama re-elected, which is what it's all about. No surprise there.
    Originally posted by Priceless
    Good to see you're so reasonable.
    Originally posted by ScoobyDoo
    Very well, said.
    Originally posted by Rover
    A fair assessment Bob.

    Comment


    • Re: The Power of the SCOTUS II: "Release the Kagan!"

      It sounds like I may not have been the only one with a "huh? what?" reaction....

      From WSJ:

      Several justices said they couldn't understand the legal distinction between allowing ad-hoc checking of a person's immigration status and codifying that into a general policy, since federal law already requires the federal government to answer questions from state officials about a person's status.

      Chief Justice John Roberts said the section merely required state officers to notify the federal government that they had picked up an illegal immigrant and it was entirely up to the federal government to decide whether to take action against that person. Chief Justice Roberts said he couldn't understand how that interfered with federal discretion over immigration enforcement.

      The question before the court was whether the Arizona law interfered with federal law, which both sides agree enjoys primacy in questions of immigration.

      Solicitor General Donald Verrilli, representing the Obama administration, said the status-checking provision worked with the Arizona law's other provisions to undermine federal immigration policy as legislated by Congress.

      But no member of the court—even those on the liberal wing—expressed clear agreement with Mr. Verrilli's stance on that point. "You can see it's not selling very well," said Justice Sonia Sotomayor, who said she was confused by Mr. Verrilli's answer as to why a statewide rule on checking status was worse than an ad-hoc policy.

      Some aspects of the law did come under further scrutiny:

      Chief Justice Roberts said he was troubled by the provision criminalizing job seeking because he said it went further than federal law in punishing illegal immigrants. Justice Sotomayor also expressed concerns about that part of the law, saying Congress rejected the idea of punishing illegal immigrants who seek work.
      which could lead to a nuanced ruling:

      Each of the four provisions struck down by lower courts involves a separate legal analysis, meaning that the Supreme Court could uphold some but not others. Justice Elena Kagan, who was solicitor general when the Obama administration filed its challenge to the Arizona law, recused herself.

      In an unrelated matter, SCOTUS also issued a technical ruling on an IRS matter that went 5 - 4 with Kennedy in the minority. That doesn't happen often.
      "Hope is a good thing; maybe the best of things."

      "Beer is a sign that God loves us and wants us to be happy." -- Benjamin Franklin

      "Being Irish, he had an abiding sense of tragedy, which sustained him through temporary periods of joy." -- W. B. Yeats

      "People generally are most impatient with those flaws in others about which they are most ashamed of in themselves." - folk wisdom

      Comment


      • Re: The Power of the SCOTUS II: "Release the Kagan!"

        Originally posted by FreshFish View Post
        In an unrelated matter, SCOTUS also issued a technical ruling on an IRS matter that went 5 - 4 with Kennedy in the minority. That doesn't happen often.
        That is interesting. There must be some sort of "clustering" metric on which justices tend to group together.

        I wouldn't be surprised if the correlations are pretty low, though. The "liberal"/"conservative" distinction holds on high profile politicized cases, but the Court still seems to do lots of technical work where the voting is all over the place.
        Cornell University
        National Champion 1967, 1970
        ECAC Champion 1967, 1968, 1969, 1970, 1973, 1980, 1986, 1996, 1997, 2003, 2005, 2010
        Ivy League Champion 1966, 1967, 1968, 1969, 1970, 1971, 1972, 1973, 1977, 1978, 1983, 1984, 1985, 1996, 1997, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2012, 2014, 2018, 2019, 2020

        Comment


        • Re: The Power of the SCOTUS II: "Release the Kagan!"

          Originally posted by Kepler View Post
          That is interesting.
          "Interesting" that you used the word "interesting," eh?
          "Hope is a good thing; maybe the best of things."

          "Beer is a sign that God loves us and wants us to be happy." -- Benjamin Franklin

          "Being Irish, he had an abiding sense of tragedy, which sustained him through temporary periods of joy." -- W. B. Yeats

          "People generally are most impatient with those flaws in others about which they are most ashamed of in themselves." - folk wisdom

          Comment


          • Re: The Power of the SCOTUS II: "Release the Kagan!"

            Originally posted by FreshFish View Post
            "Interesting" that you used the word "interesting," eh?
            Yeah, but when I use I'm being sincere.
            Cornell University
            National Champion 1967, 1970
            ECAC Champion 1967, 1968, 1969, 1970, 1973, 1980, 1986, 1996, 1997, 2003, 2005, 2010
            Ivy League Champion 1966, 1967, 1968, 1969, 1970, 1971, 1972, 1973, 1977, 1978, 1983, 1984, 1985, 1996, 1997, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2012, 2014, 2018, 2019, 2020

            Comment


            • Re: The Power of the SCOTUS II: "Release the Kagan!"

              Originally posted by Kepler View Post
              Yeah, but when I use I'm being sincere.
              I think you meant "and" instead of "but". Otherwise you would be insulting another's integrity unfairly.
              "Hope is a good thing; maybe the best of things."

              "Beer is a sign that God loves us and wants us to be happy." -- Benjamin Franklin

              "Being Irish, he had an abiding sense of tragedy, which sustained him through temporary periods of joy." -- W. B. Yeats

              "People generally are most impatient with those flaws in others about which they are most ashamed of in themselves." - folk wisdom

              Comment


              • Re: The Power of the SCOTUS II: "Release the Kagan!"

                Originally posted by FreshFish View Post
                I think you meant "and" instead of "but". Otherwise you would be insulting another's integrity unfairly.
                How "unfairly"?
                Cornell University
                National Champion 1967, 1970
                ECAC Champion 1967, 1968, 1969, 1970, 1973, 1980, 1986, 1996, 1997, 2003, 2005, 2010
                Ivy League Champion 1966, 1967, 1968, 1969, 1970, 1971, 1972, 1973, 1977, 1978, 1983, 1984, 1985, 1996, 1997, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2012, 2014, 2018, 2019, 2020

                Comment


                • Re: The Power of the SCOTUS II: "Release the Kagan!"

                  Originally posted by Kepler View Post
                  How "unfairly"?
                  are you being obtuse, or deliberately rude.?


                  EDIT:
                  oops, to quote Emily Litella (again...sigh) "never mind."
                  Last edited by FreshFish; 04-26-2012, 02:20 PM.
                  "Hope is a good thing; maybe the best of things."

                  "Beer is a sign that God loves us and wants us to be happy." -- Benjamin Franklin

                  "Being Irish, he had an abiding sense of tragedy, which sustained him through temporary periods of joy." -- W. B. Yeats

                  "People generally are most impatient with those flaws in others about which they are most ashamed of in themselves." - folk wisdom

                  Comment


                  • Re: The Power of the SCOTUS II: "Release the Kagan!"

                    Originally posted by FreshFish View Post
                    are you being obtuse, or deliberately rude?
                    I'm joking. You see those smiley faces? They mean "joking." I actually didn't think they were necessary, but apparently they weren't even sufficient...
                    Cornell University
                    National Champion 1967, 1970
                    ECAC Champion 1967, 1968, 1969, 1970, 1973, 1980, 1986, 1996, 1997, 2003, 2005, 2010
                    Ivy League Champion 1966, 1967, 1968, 1969, 1970, 1971, 1972, 1973, 1977, 1978, 1983, 1984, 1985, 1996, 1997, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2012, 2014, 2018, 2019, 2020

                    Comment


                    • Re: The Power of the SCOTUS II: "Release the Kagan!"

                      So here's the People's Rights Amendment:

                      Section 1. We the people who ordain and establish this Constitution intend the rights protected by this Constitution to be the rights of natural persons.

                      Section 2. People, person, or persons as used in this Constitution does not include corporations, limited liability companies or other corporate entities established by the laws of any state, the United States, or any foreign state, and such corporate entities are subject to such regulation as the people, through their elected state and federal representatives, deem reasonable and are otherwise consistent with the powers of Congress and the States under this Constitution.

                      Section 3. Nothing contained herein shall be construed to limit the people's rights of freedom of speech, freedom of the press, free exercise of religion, and such other rights of the people, which rights are inalienable.
                      Very interested to hear thoughts on this.

                      Comment


                      • Re: The Power of the SCOTUS II: "Release the Kagan!"

                        Originally posted by WeWantMore View Post
                        So here's the People's Rights Amendment:



                        Very interested to hear thoughts on this.
                        Banning corporations but not unions? No thanks. Both or neither. Government should not be picking sides.
                        "Hope is a good thing; maybe the best of things."

                        "Beer is a sign that God loves us and wants us to be happy." -- Benjamin Franklin

                        "Being Irish, he had an abiding sense of tragedy, which sustained him through temporary periods of joy." -- W. B. Yeats

                        "People generally are most impatient with those flaws in others about which they are most ashamed of in themselves." - folk wisdom

                        Comment


                        • Re: The Power of the SCOTUS II: "Release the Kagan!"

                          Originally posted by FreshFish View Post
                          Banning corporations but not unions? No thanks. Both or neither. Government should not be picking sides.
                          Then substitute language that says "artificial persons such as collective entities" or somesuch. You're missing the point of the amendment.
                          Cornell University
                          National Champion 1967, 1970
                          ECAC Champion 1967, 1968, 1969, 1970, 1973, 1980, 1986, 1996, 1997, 2003, 2005, 2010
                          Ivy League Champion 1966, 1967, 1968, 1969, 1970, 1971, 1972, 1973, 1977, 1978, 1983, 1984, 1985, 1996, 1997, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2012, 2014, 2018, 2019, 2020

                          Comment


                          • Re: The Power of the SCOTUS II: "Release the Kagan!"

                            Originally posted by Kepler View Post
                            You're missing the point of the amendment.
                            OH?

                            Section 2. People, person, or persons as used in this Constitution does not include corporations, limited liability companies or other corporate entities established by the laws of any state, the United States, or any foreign state, and such corporate entities are subject to such regulation as the people, through their elected state and federal representatives, deem reasonable and are otherwise consistent with the powers of Congress and the States under this Constitution.
                            [emphasis added]

                            Are you and I reading the same text?

                            I don't think I am missing the point; it seems you want to have "the point" be otherwise than it actually is.

                            Originally posted by Kepler View Post
                            Then substitute language that says "artificial persons such as collective entities" or somesuch.
                            Bigger picture, with your suggestion to "substitute more appropriate" language, it really does seem we agree again here.
                            Last edited by FreshFish; 04-27-2012, 07:10 AM.
                            "Hope is a good thing; maybe the best of things."

                            "Beer is a sign that God loves us and wants us to be happy." -- Benjamin Franklin

                            "Being Irish, he had an abiding sense of tragedy, which sustained him through temporary periods of joy." -- W. B. Yeats

                            "People generally are most impatient with those flaws in others about which they are most ashamed of in themselves." - folk wisdom

                            Comment


                            • Re: The Power of the SCOTUS II: "Release the Kagan!"

                              Originally posted by FreshFish View Post
                              I don't think I am missing the point; it seems you want to have "the point" be otherwise than it actually is.
                              You are still missing the point. The purpose of the amendment is to remove the confusion of the rights granted by the constitution between human and non-human entities. "Corporate" entities are collective, non-human entities, not corporations as opposed to unions. So if the language bugs you then by all means add something about unions, but please don't say "no thanks" because whatever transient political itch that needs to be scratched isn't getting the attention you think it deserves -- that's getting lost in the trivialities.

                              This is a case where a particular hobby-horse of one side's political rhetoric should not be an excuse to ditch the far more important principle: it is human beings, not dollar bills, who established the nation for their collective security and to preserve their rights.
                              Cornell University
                              National Champion 1967, 1970
                              ECAC Champion 1967, 1968, 1969, 1970, 1973, 1980, 1986, 1996, 1997, 2003, 2005, 2010
                              Ivy League Champion 1966, 1967, 1968, 1969, 1970, 1971, 1972, 1973, 1977, 1978, 1983, 1984, 1985, 1996, 1997, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2012, 2014, 2018, 2019, 2020

                              Comment


                              • Re: The Power of the SCOTUS II: "Release the Kagan!"

                                Originally posted by Kepler View Post
                                You are still missing the point. The purpose of the amendment is to remove the confusion of the rights granted by the constitution between human and non-human entities. "Corporate" entities are collective, non-human entities, not corporations as opposed to unions. So if the language bugs you then by all means add something about unions, but please don't say "no thanks" because whatever transient political itch that needs to be scratched isn't getting the attention you think it deserves -- that's getting lost in the trivialities.

                                This is a case where a particular hobby-horse of one side's political rhetoric should not be an excuse to ditch the far more important principle: it is human beings, not dollar bills, who established the nation for their collective security and to preserve their rights.
                                respectfully suggest that there are two different "points" and neither one of us is "missing" anything; rather, each of us is discussing something different.

                                The Peoples Amendment as written is clearly designed to apply only to corporations. You would prefer that it apply to more than corporations, as would I. It would be nice to have politics be the idealized version you long for.

                                At the same time, for now we have the First Amendment, which includes the right of people to peacably assemble to petition the government. The proposed People's Amendment, however, would revoke that right. I'm not convinced that rewriting the First Amendment is a good idea, although I remain open to persuasion.

                                People gain power through association, and for us to try to figure out which kinds of associations are permissible and which kinds of associations are impermissible? That would be a challenge even for Solon, or Solomon. It may well be the case that the continued evolution of the internet and associated social media will render this discussion moot in ten years anyway.
                                "Hope is a good thing; maybe the best of things."

                                "Beer is a sign that God loves us and wants us to be happy." -- Benjamin Franklin

                                "Being Irish, he had an abiding sense of tragedy, which sustained him through temporary periods of joy." -- W. B. Yeats

                                "People generally are most impatient with those flaws in others about which they are most ashamed of in themselves." - folk wisdom

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X