(un-) Official Minnesota Vikings 2009-2010 season thread

[Slap Shot]

Re: (un-) Official Minnesota Vikings 2009-2010 season thread

My OC crowd was thinking along the same lines:

Then they are ********.

But seriously, how many people currently associated with Vikings were there in 2000? I doubt reaching 41-0 had anything to do with keeping them in/pulling them out.

[The Rube]

Re: (un-) Official Minnesota Vikings 2009-2010 season thread

That was the first and last time I bet more than pocket change on an NFL game (bet on the Giants figuring at the time "there's no way in **** a bad MN game wins on the road").

I had the over 42 in that game.

[Bakunin]

Re: (un-) Official Minnesota Vikings 2009-2010 season thread

Was the Vikings beating the Giants via KR, PR, and INT for touchdown before or after the 41-0 game?

That was the first and last time I bet more than pocket change on an NFL game (bet on the Giants figuring at the time "there's no way in **** a bad MN game wins on the road").

[bigblue_dl]

Re: (un-) Official Minnesota Vikings 2009-2010 season thread

My OC crowd was thinking along the same lines:

"Why are the starters in?!" (when it was 34-0)
"41-donut. Then they are pulled."
"Why? Oh, nevermind." (big grin)

I think they should have kept the starters in and tried to hang 70 on those ****ers.

[The Rube]

Re: (un-) Official Minnesota Vikings 2009-2010 season thread

at one point it was 41-0. Who thought of that?

Seriously, go Cowboys.

My OC crowd was thinking along the same lines:

"Why are the starters in?!" (when it was 34-0)
"41-donut. Then they are pulled."
"Why? Oh, nevermind." (big grin)

[ajoyce02]

Re: (un-) Official Minnesota Vikings 2009-2010 season thread

Was the Vikings beating the Giants via KR, PR, and INT for touchdown before or after the 41-0 game?

That seemed much sweeter to me then a drubbing would. Since as I recall the offense did nothing in either game, yet they somehow won the one.

After.

[JF_Gophers]

Re: (un-) Official Minnesota Vikings 2009-2010 season thread

Was the Vikings beating the Giants via KR, PR, and INT for touchdown before or after the 41-0 game?

That seemed much sweeter to me then a drubbing would. Since as I recall the offense did nothing in either game, yet they somehow won the one.

[Sloe Gin]

Re: (un-) Official Minnesota Vikings 2009-2010 season thread

PA needs to start off his show tommorrow with:

YES!!! YES!!! THE COWBOYS HAVE KNOCKED THE EAGLES OUT OF A PLAYOFF BYE!!

agreed

[Dirty]

Re: (un-) Official Minnesota Vikings 2009-2010 season thread

PA needs to start off his show tommorrow with:

YES!!! YES!!! THE COWBOYS HAVE KNOCKED THE EAGLES OUT OF A PLAYOFF BYE!!

[MarkEagleUSA]

Re: (un-) Official Minnesota Vikings 2009-2010 season thread

Yeah but that isnt what Sloe Gin was hinting at I don't think...

(think 2000 NFC Title Game )

Yes, but 41-0 holds a special significance against the Giants.

Guess I'm a little slow tonight...

[bigblue_dl]

Re: (un-) Official Minnesota Vikings 2009-2010 season thread

******* width="425" height="344">****** name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/tbMk1qffPNM&hl=en_US&fs=1&color1=0x402061&color2=0x9461ca">****** name="allowFullScreen" value="true">****** name="allowscriptaccess" value="always">****** src="http://www.youtube.com/v/tbMk1qffPNM&hl=en_US&fs=1&color1=0x402061&color2=0x9461ca" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344">

Maybe it will work better this time.

[ts8801]

Re: (un-) Official Minnesota Vikings 2009-2010 season thread

ill take a 41-donut when the starters were playing

[Dirty]

Re: (un-) Official Minnesota Vikings 2009-2010 season thread

Actualy, it was 44-0 at it's worst!

Yes, but 41-0 holds a special significance against the Giants.

[Handyman]

Re: (un-) Official Minnesota Vikings 2009-2010 season thread

Actualy, it was 44-0 at it's worst!

Yeah but that isnt what Sloe Gin was hinting at I don't think...

(think 2000 NFC Title Game )

[MarkEagleUSA]

Re: (un-) Official Minnesota Vikings 2009-2010 season thread

at one point it was 41-0.

Actualy, it was 44-0 at it's worst!