Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

(un-) Official Minnesota Vikings 2009-2010 season thread

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Sloe Gin
    replied
    Re: (un-) Official Minnesota Vikings 2009-2010 season thread

    Originally posted by goldy_331 View Post
    Thanks for sharing your wisdom with us.
    sorry, ESPN must have hijacked my account.

    Leave a comment:


  • goldy_331
    replied
    Re: (un-) Official Minnesota Vikings 2009-2010 season thread

    Originally posted by Sloe Gin View Post
    I say again. They have no chance.
    Thanks for sharing your wisdom with us.

    Leave a comment:


  • Sloe Gin
    replied
    Re: (un-) Official Minnesota Vikings 2009-2010 season thread

    Originally posted by ScoobyDoo View Post
    No Respect. It amazes me that ESPNFavre is on the no respect for their blow boy bandwagon. Amazing.

    This is it. You had your bye, you got your QB. Now do what you're supposed to do and win.
    I say again. They have no chance.

    Leave a comment:


  • ScoobyDoo
    replied
    Re: (un-) Official Minnesota Vikings 2009-2010 season thread

    No Respect. It amazes me that ESPNFavre is on the no respect for their blow boy bandwagon. Amazing.

    This is it. You had your bye, you got your QB. Now do what you're supposed to do and win.

    Leave a comment:


  • Sloe Gin
    replied
    Re: (un-) Official Minnesota Vikings 2009-2010 season thread

    woohoo, season ends today

    Leave a comment:


  • Handyman
    replied
    Re: (un-) Official Minnesota Vikings 2009-2010 season thread

    Originally posted by ExileOnDaytonStreet View Post
    I was thinking of a way to explain Dilfer's comments by thinking that it came from some deep-seeded anger against Favre for never getting injured while he was his backup.

    Then I remembered that Dilfer never was Favre's backup, and I was thinking of Ty Detmer.

    I honestly got Trent Dilfer confuses with Ty Detmer.

    Is there a better way to explain how bad a QB Dilfer was?
    That is friggin hilarious!

    Leave a comment:


  • ExileOnDaytonStreet
    replied
    Re: (un-) Official Minnesota Vikings 2009-2010 season thread

    I was thinking of a way to explain Dilfer's comments by thinking that it came from some deep-seeded anger against Favre for never getting injured while he was his backup.

    Then I remembered that Dilfer never was Favre's backup, and I was thinking of Ty Detmer.

    I honestly got Trent Dilfer confused with Ty Detmer.

    Is there a better way to explain how bad a QB Dilfer was?
    Last edited by ExileOnDaytonStreet; 01-15-2010, 12:24 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Handyman
    replied
    Re: (un-) Official Minnesota Vikings 2009-2010 season thread

    Every year there is the one team who wins in the Wild Card round and the media make them the new darling. This year it was going to be Green Bay for a whole slew of reasons but they lost. (Philly was that team before getting beat by the Cowboys in Week 17) Dallas won so now they are the hot pick.

    I still don't understand why anyone listens to anything Trent Dilfer has to say. First of all he was a bad QB and second he is a moron. this was the guy who started a fight with John Randle.

    Let them all pick against the Vikes, it just increases the chances the Vikes win.

    Leave a comment:


  • GOPHER FREAK
    replied
    Re: (un-) Official Minnesota Vikings 2009-2010 season thread

    Originally posted by Handyman View Post
    Are you surprised...they tired of Favre (partly because GB lost) and now FINALLY Romo hasn't crapped the bed late in the season. The media wants Dallas to win for about 1000 reasons...fine by me!

    The good news is they were wrong on 3 of 4 games last weekend. Some of these same idiot's were saying we would have a Packer/Patriot superbowl. And the big question has gone from "can Tony Romo win a playoff game" to "can Tony Romo be beaten in a playoff game".


    Trent Dilfer was just on Mike and Mike saying he thinks the Cowboys win in a blowout. He was also talking about Favre's "interception DNA" and how it was going to show up on Sunday. Funny how he made no mention of Tony Romo's "playoff choker" DNA.

    Leave a comment:


  • ScoobyDoo
    replied
    Re: (un-) Official Minnesota Vikings 2009-2010 season thread

    Originally posted by MadTownSioux View Post
    So, First Favre dishes out some Cowboys Bulletin Board material, then he needs a StarTrib columnist to explain it away?
    The real bulletin board material is how ESPN has already put Dallas in the NFC Championship game.

    Leave a comment:


  • MadTownSioux
    replied
    Re: (un-) Official Minnesota Vikings 2009-2010 season thread

    So, First Favre dishes out some Cowboys Bulletin Board material, then he needs a StarTrib columnist to explain it away?

    Leave a comment:


  • Bob Gray
    replied
    Re: (un-) Official Minnesota Vikings 2009-2010 season thread

    Originally posted by ScoobyDoo View Post
    75 and it was MASSIVE PI.
    Agreed. And that was on top of Mark Mullaney getting tackled by the offensive lineman on the same play as he came in on Staubach and Drew Pearson getting a gift in-bounds call earlier in the drive that otherwise would have ended the drive. I remember the last moments of that game more than any other Viking event of my entire youth. It as a crying shame that the best Viking team of the 70s was denied a chance to get to the Super Bowl due to multiple blown calls on the last drive.

    Leave a comment:


  • Sloe Gin
    replied
    Re: (un-) Official Minnesota Vikings 2009-2010 season thread

    Originally posted by bigblue_dl View Post
    They'll jump back on the Vikings bandwagon after the 45-17 shellacking that will be laid upon the 'boys on Sunday.
    nah. The Vikings are the least-**** team in the playoffs. No one will be on their bandwagon until they win the Bowl.

    Leave a comment:


  • bigblue_dl
    replied
    Re: (un-) Official Minnesota Vikings 2009-2010 season thread

    Originally posted by Handyman View Post
    Are you surprised...they tired of Favre (partly because GB lost) and now FINALLY Romo hasn't crapped the bed late in the season. The media wants Dallas to win for about 1000 reasons...fine by me!
    They'll jump back on the Vikings bandwagon after the 45-17 shellacking that will be laid upon the 'boys on Sunday.

    Leave a comment:


  • Handyman
    replied
    Re: (un-) Official Minnesota Vikings 2009-2010 season thread

    Are you surprised...they tired of Favre (partly because GB lost) and now FINALLY Romo hasn't crapped the bed late in the season. The media wants Dallas to win for about 1000 reasons...fine by me!

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X