Originally posted by mookie1995
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Sanctuary Cities/States - DON'T Come all ye to Bethlehem
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by TalonsUpPuckDown View PostI'm sorry gang, I'm the ignorant doofus here. I've read/seen all sorts of stuff on this topic including some Fox News that I was forced to watch while in a restaurant and I still cannot figure out what the outcome was supposed to be that would have satisfied the right. Can someone on the right side of the aisle help me out by solving for X in the statement below:
If the people of MV had done X then I (Drew, Whalers, Fox News, et al) would be completely satisfied with the outcome of this scenario (i.e. not triggered).
Based on this discussion I'm beginning to think solving for X is like trying to divide by zero...
Comment
-
I think you have your answer Talons.**NOTE: The misleading post above was brought to you by Reynold's Wrap and American Steeples, makers of Crosses.
Originally Posted by dropthatpuck-Scooby's a lost cause.
Originally Posted by First Time, Long Time-Always knew you were nothing but a troll.
Comment
-
Originally posted by ericredaxe View Post
You are buying into right wing propaganda. What facilities do they have on Marthas Vineyard that could support these people? Is there a base or barracks that could house and feed 50 people there? If so, I am not aware of it. Comments such as "why didn't Obama let them stay at his place" etc etc are just stupid. Staying crammed into the floor of a church or school gym while school is in session is simply not sustainable.
Nobody is saying that the base is paradise, but it is a safe, functional spot in a neighboring town where they can be put up as they go through the system.
Somewhat of a separate issue but there should be harsh financial penalties for owning a second home. It would definitely open up some preexisting supply and give resources to build new supply.Originally posted by BobbyBrady
Crosby probably wouldn't even be on BC's top two lines next year
Comment
-
Originally posted by Whalers View Post
So where were they when 50 POC needed help? Not ONE household on the island saw fit to have one of the people stay with them? With all of their money and resources they have available in "Disneyland"?a legend and an out of work bum look a lot alike, daddy.
Comment
-
I can't believe the local McDonalds doesn't accept sick people suffering from emergency medical situations in their play area. It must be because they hate sick people and not because their play area is in no way set up to handle and process sick people.
Cornell '04, Stanford '06
KDR
Rover Frenchy, Classic! Great post.
iwh30 I wish I could be as smart as you. I really do you are the man
gregg729 I just saw your sig, you do love having people revel in your "intelligence."
Ritt18 you are the perfect representation of your alma mater.
Miss Thundercat That's it, you win.
TBA#2 I want to kill you and dance in your blood.
DisplacedCornellian Hahaha. Thread over. Frenchy wins.
Test to see if I can add this.
Comment
-
Originally posted by aparch View PostOoooooohhhh......
https://***********/QasimRashid/stat...23305527492610
San Antonio Sheriff is opening an investigation into the kidnapping of 50 migrants from a migrant resource center in San Antonio. Confirmed that 48 migrants were lured, and the sheriff emphasized lured, under false pretenses to stay in a hotel and then board an airplane where they were flown to Florida, and then on to Martha's Vineyard. At Martha's Vineyard, they were posed for photo ops, and then "unceremoniously stranded." Someone, from out of state, preyed upon these people with false pretenses to "exploit and hoodwink" into being used for "political posturing."
Whalers, Drew, comment?Originally posted by BobbyBrady
Crosby probably wouldn't even be on BC's top two lines next year
- 1 like
Comment
-
No, not outraged. As Drew mentions, these migrants have to live in SOMEONE's backyard, why not make it the backyards of the people who vote for this and profess to care so much? THAT is the question that needs to be asked and answered by others here. In all of the responses so far, not ONE of you has mentioned taking in any of the 2,500,000 migrants who have showed up since Jan 2021. Forget Martha's Vineyard, any Big resettlements in Chestnut Hill, Edina, or Westchester? Where is your compassion? No, you would be outraged if it happened.
Comment
-
What don't you understand that these people already were in an area awaiting processing. LEGALLY.
Your heros KIDNAPPED them and shuttled them off to an unknown location for a ****ING photo op.“Demolish the bridges behind you… then there is no choice but to build again.”
Live Radio from 100.3
Comment
-
I have a simple solution for the Republicans. Get the laws changed. You changed abortion law. Now change immigration law. I'm sure EVERYONE on Planet Earth will accept the country with the Statue of Liberty changing their laws so "asylum" is never allowed again to refugee's.**NOTE: The misleading post above was brought to you by Reynold's Wrap and American Steeples, makers of Crosses.
Originally Posted by dropthatpuck-Scooby's a lost cause.
Originally Posted by First Time, Long Time-Always knew you were nothing but a troll.
- 1 like
Comment
-
Whalers, I'd ask if you would do the same in return: if a Proud Boy needed to find refuge in your basement, would you open your house up to them? Feed them? Open your heart and wallet to them?
But, judging by your posts, you already are.“Demolish the bridges behind you… then there is no choice but to build again.”
Live Radio from 100.3
Comment
-
Originally posted by aparch View PostWhat don't you understand that these people already were in an area awaiting processing. LEGALLY.
Your heros KIDNAPPED them and shuttled them off to an unknown location for a ****ING photo op.Originally posted by BobbyBrady
Crosby probably wouldn't even be on BC's top two lines next year
- 1 like
Comment
-
Originally posted by Drew S. View Post
My understanding is the vast majority of the people entering have no shot of getting asylum but are allowed to apply and can stay until it is inevitably denied. A lot slip thru the cracks/are never followed up on. What they’re doing is legal but disingenuous and is attempting to skip the line. With all that being said I’d be fine significantly increasing the amount of people allowed in legally.
Whatever, dude.
- 1 like
Comment
-
Tear down the ****ing statue. Build a wall. Shoot on sight.
Done. A policy Republicans can get behind.**NOTE: The misleading post above was brought to you by Reynold's Wrap and American Steeples, makers of Crosses.
Originally Posted by dropthatpuck-Scooby's a lost cause.
Originally Posted by First Time, Long Time-Always knew you were nothing but a troll.
Comment
Comment