2022 MidTerms & State races- who ya got?

[Kepler]

It does turn out to have been a successful move for the Dems to push Dumpies, who are getting bent over.

But, as gross as this is, I agree with Drew. t's not a good long term strategy, because there is literally no low to which Republican voters will not sink, and if we keep doing that we will eventually have lightning strike and these Nazis will win elections. And yeah I know right now the Right is so craven and sick there's no substantive difference between Nazis and normal Republicans, but remember this a difference.

A normal Republican will say they want to genocide blacks and LGBTQs and Leftists and non-Christians, in order to gain power and wealth, because they are stupid and amoral.

But Dumpies actually are driven by their fanaticism to genocide blacks and LGBTQs and Leftists and non-Christians, because they are stupid and mentally ill.

I am glad Drew recognizes this difference.

[Kepler]

NBC projects for Hassan in NH. Have any other outlets followed?

Yes.

[Spartanforlife4]

Wisconsin is closer than I thought it would be at this point, but looks like Milwaukee is already over 50% in. Generally they’re later and giving huge bumps to Dems.

[dxmnkd316]

So something I haven't seen anyone talk about is the U-shaped election returns.

Everyone knows the heavy D swing for mail-in and early voting. Then come the same-day votes. but there's a very important subdivision within the same day. The middle returns are all going to be red-heavy, quick to close, quick to report. But as the night goes on, you start to have the deeply urban precincts that are heavily D where the GOP has ****ed them with too few voting machines. So they have to sit in line for hours after polls close to get those results. I think the longer GA and PA hang out there, the better it is for Democrats.

The U-shaped returns are a very important characteristic.

[dxmnkd316]

It does turn out to have been a successful move for the Dems to push Dumpies, who are getting bent over.

But, as gross as this is, I agree with Drew. t's not a good long term strategy, because there is literally no low to which Republican voters will not sink, and if we keep doing that we will eventually have lightning strike and these Nazis will win elections. And yeah I know right now the Right is so craven and sick there's no substantive difference between Nazis and normal Republicans, but remember this a difference.

A normal Republican will say they want to genocide blacks and LGBTQs and Leftists and non-Christians, in order to gain power and wealth, because they are stupid and amoral.

But Dumpies actually are driven by their fanaticism to genocide blacks and LGBTQs and Leftists and non-Christians, because they are stupid and mentally ill.

I am glad Drew recognizes this difference.

100% agreed. It worked now, but it won't work always and it's going to **** us hard at some point.

Sometimes you set fires to act as firebreaks. Sometimes you get burned alive by the fire you set. You really need to know what you're doing if you're going to do that.

[Kepler]

Is there enough outstanding in Atlanta for Warnock to comeback? I see dx’s chart, but Walker keeps increasing his lead each update.

It's going to just be a matter of who is left. Walker will win 50 400-person pig ****er counties by 90/10. Warnock can overcome that with one city precinct. So: who is left to count?

It's GA so don;t be surprised if Kemp doesn't just flat out cheat like he did to steal his seat the first time. The GIP makes Mayor Daley look like Grover ****ing Cleveland.

[French Rage]

So something I haven't seen anyone talk about is the U-shaped election returns.

Everyone knows the heavy D swing for mail-in and early voting. Then come the same-day votes. but there's a very important subdivision within the same day. The middle returns are all going to be red-heavy, quick to close, quick to report. But as the night goes on, you start to have the deeply urban precincts that are heavily D where the GOP has ****ed them with too few voting machines. So they have to sit in line for hours after polls close to get those results. I think the longer GA and PA hang out there, the better it is for Democrats.

The U-shaped returns are a very important characteristic.

Additionally, while in some places the early/mail-in comes in first, in others (possibly within the same state) the mail-in comes in late, so the remaining chunks are likely to be D.

God, it's a wonder how you and I know these obvious things without "read your amortization tables" dip**** telling us!!!!

[dxmnkd316]

Is there enough outstanding in Atlanta for Warnock to comeback? I see dx’s chart, but Walker keeps increasing his lead each update.

Here's the raw data:

Counties	Rep		Dem		Lib		Other		Expected				1979835	2093688	81856.42	1850.553	D Bonus		-8.3%		2,036,813	2,036,814	81,860	1,876
	%	Votes	%	Votes	%	Votes	%	Votes	%	Roundup	Expected	Delta	Rep	Dem	Other	Write-in	Rep	Dem	Other	Write-in	Rep	Dem	Other	Write-in
Appling	80.1%	5343	18.9%	1260	1.0%	65	0.0%	0	94.1%	94.1%	7086.079	418.0786	5678.002	1339.001	69.07545	0	88.4%	10.6%	1.0%	0.0%	5,713	1,304	69	0
Atkinson	76.3%	1706	22.5%	502	1.2%	27	0.0%	0	84.7%	84.7%	2638.725	403.7249	2014.168	592.68	31.87721	0	84.6%	14.2%	1.2%	0.0%	2,048	559	32	0
Bacon	86.4%	3204	12.3%	458	1.3%	48	0.0%	0	93.1%	93.1%	3984.962	274.9624	3441.461	491.9441	51.55747	0	94.7%	4.0%	1.3%	0.0%	3,465	469	52	0
Baker	57.1%	709	42.0%	522	0.9%	11	0.0%	0	92.3%	92.3%	1345.612	103.6121	768.1473	565.5471	11.91766	0	65.4%	33.7%	0.9%	0.0%	777	557	12	0
Baldwin	49.6%	7416	49.0%	7324	1.4%	214	0.0%	0	91.9%	91.9%	16272.03	1318.035	8069.641	7969.532	232.8618	0	57.9%	40.7%	1.4%	0.0%	8,180	7,860	232	0
Banks	87.2%	6348	10.6%	772	2.2%	159	0.0%	0	95.0%	95.0%	7662.105	383.1053	6682.105	812.6316	167.3684	0	95.5%	2.3%	2.2%	0.0%	6,714	781	167	0
Barrow	68.7%	20127	28.1%	8232	3.0%	893	0.2%	61	95.0%	95.0%	30855.79	1542.789	21186.32	8665.263	940	64.21053	77.0%	19.8%	3.0%	0.2%	21,316	8,537	939	64
Bartow	73.7%	29335	23.5%	9337	2.6%	1053	0.2%	73	99.0%	100.0%	39798	0	29335	9337	1053	73	82.0%	15.2%	2.6%	0.2%	29,335	9,337	1,053	73
Ben Hill	63.7%	3233	34.8%	1767	1.4%	73	0.0%	0	87.9%	87.9%	5771.331	698.3311	3678.043	2010.239	83.04892	0	72.0%	26.5%	1.4%	0.0%	3,736	1,952	83	0
Berrien	83.5%	5001	15.2%	908	1.3%	79	0.0%	0	92.0%	92.0%	6508.696	520.6957	5435.87	986.9565	85.86957	0	91.8%	6.9%	1.3%	0.0%	5,479	944	86	0
Bibb	37.4%	20179	61.2%	32997	1.3%	694	0.1%	60	85.4%	85.4%	63149.88	9219.883	23628.81	38638.17	812.6464	70.25761	45.7%	52.9%	1.3%	0.1%	24,397	37,870	814	69
Bleckley	76.7%	3674	21.7%	1039	1.6%	77	0.0%	1	94.7%	94.7%	5059.134	268.1341	3879.62	1097.149	81.3094	1.055966	85.0%	13.4%	1.6%	0.0%	3,902	1,075	81	1
Brantley	90.2%	5275	8.2%	477	1.6%	94	0.0%	0	95.0%	95.0%	6153.684	307.6842	5552.632	502.1053	98.94737	0	98.5%	-0.1%	1.6%	0.0%	5,578	477	99	0
Brooks	62.9%	3515	35.6%	1993	1.4%	77	0.1%	7	93.9%	93.9%	5955.272	363.2716	3743.344	2122.471	82.00213	7.454739	71.2%	27.3%	1.4%	0.1%	3,774	2,092	82	7
Bryan	65.8%	11141	31.9%	5401	2.2%	379	0.0%	0	95.0%	95.0%	17811.58	890.5789	11727.37	5685.263	398.9474	0	74.1%	23.6%	2.2%	0.0%	11,801	5,611	399	0
Bulloch	50.9%	13160	47.6%	12306	1.5%	396	0.0%	0	95.0%	95.0%	27223.16	1361.158	13852.63	12953.68	416.8421	0	59.2%	39.3%	1.5%	0.0%	13,966	12,840	416	0
Burke	52.8%	4459	46.0%	3879	1.2%	102	0.0%	1	93.0%	93.0%	9076.344	635.3441	4794.624	4170.968	109.6774	1.075269	61.1%	37.7%	1.2%	0.0%	4,847	4,118	110	1
Butts	70.4%	6781	27.6%	2663	1.9%	182	0.1%	8	99.0%	100.0%	9634	0	6781	2663	182	8	78.7%	19.3%	1.9%	0.1%	6,781	2,663	182	8
Calhoun	44.4%	695	55.1%	862	0.5%	8	0.0%	0	79.2%	79.2%	1976.01	411.0101	877.5253	1088.384	10.10101	0	52.7%	46.8%	0.5%	0.0%	912	1,054	10	0
Camden	65.4%	11695	32.2%	5756	2.3%	417	0.1%	15	99.0%	100.0%	17883	0	11695	5756	417	15	73.7%	23.9%	2.3%	0.1%	11,695	5,756	417	15
Candler	71.8%	2550	26.7%	950	1.4%	51	0.0%	1	95.0%	95.0%	3738.947	186.9474	2684.211	1000	53.68421	1.052632	80.1%	18.4%	1.4%	0.0%	2,700	984	54	1
Carroll	68.6%	29831	28.9%	12576	2.5%	1087	0.0%	0	99.0%	100.0%	43494	0	29831	12576	1087	0	76.9%	20.6%	2.5%	0.0%	29,831	12,576	1,087	0
Catoosa	76.1%	18545	21.7%	5280	2.3%	558	0.0%	0	95.0%	95.0%	25666.32	1283.316	19521.05	5557.895	587.3684	0	84.4%	13.4%	2.3%	0.0%	19,629	5,451	588	0
Charlton	75.3%	2552	23.0%	780	1.6%	55	0.0%	0	96.4%	100.0%	3387	0	2552	780	55	0	83.6%	14.7%	1.6%	0.0%	2,552	780	55	0
Chatham	39.2%	39176	59.0%	58929	1.7%	1727	0.0%	0	92.6%	92.6%	107809.9	7977.935	42306.7	63638.23	1865.011	0	47.5%	50.7%	1.7%	0.0%	42,969	62,970	1,863	0
Chattahoochee	53.0%	538	44.6%	453	2.4%	24	0.1%	1	88.3%	88.3%	1150.623	134.6229	609.2865	513.0238	27.18007	1.132503	61.3%	36.3%	2.4%	0.1%	621	502	27	1
Chattooga	77.9%	5977	19.7%	1512	2.2%	172	0.2%	14	99.0%	100.0%	7675	0	5977	1512	172	14	86.2%	11.4%	2.2%	0.2%	5,977	1,512	172	14
Cherokee	67.3%	77081	29.3%	33619	3.3%	3725	0.2%	190	95.0%	95.0%	120647.4	6032.368	81137.89	35388.42	3921.053	200	75.6%	21.0%	3.3%	0.2%	81,644	34,883	3,924	202
Clarke	26.9%	10804	71.1%	28551	2.0%	799	0.0%	0	89.1%	89.1%	45066.22	4912.218	12125.7	32043.77	896.7452	0	35.2%	62.8%	2.0%	0.0%	12,535	31,634	897	0
Clay	47.1%	527	51.1%	572	1.8%	20	0.0%	0	90.6%	90.6%	1235.099	116.0993	581.6777	631.3466	22.07506	0	55.4%	42.8%	1.8%	0.0%	591	622	22	0
Clayton	11.3%	9437	87.4%	73310	1.3%	1089	0.0%	0	87.4%	87.4%	95922.2	12086.2	10797.48	83878.72	1245.995	0	19.6%	79.1%	1.3%	0.0%	11,812	82,865	1,246	0
Clinch	77.5%	1630	20.9%	439	1.7%	35	0.0%	0	89.5%	89.5%	2350.838	246.838	1821.229	490.5028	39.10615	0	85.8%	12.6%	1.7%	0.0%	1,842	470	39	0
Cobb	40.9%	100348	56.5%	138709	2.6%	6467	0.0%	0	75.7%	75.7%	324338.2	78814.18	132560.1	183235.1	8542.933	0	49.2%	48.2%	2.6%	0.0%	139,161	176,661	8,516	0
Coffee	71.3%	8442	27.1%	3213	1.6%	188	0.0%	0	90.2%	90.2%	13129.71	1286.712	9359.202	3562.084	208.4257	0	79.6%	18.8%	1.6%	0.0%	9,467	3,454	209	0
Colquitt	74.8%	9389	23.6%	2964	1.5%	192	0.0%	0	93.0%	93.0%	13489.25	944.2473	10095.7	3187.097	206.4516	0	83.1%	15.3%	1.5%	0.0%	10,174	3,108	206	0

[psych]

It does turn out to have been a successful move for the Dems to push Dumpies, who are getting bent over.

But, as gross as this is, I agree with Drew. t's not a good long term strategy, because there is literally no low to which Republican voters will not sink, and if we keep doing that we will eventually have lightning strike and these Nazis will win elections. And yeah I know right now the Right is so craven and sick there's no substantive difference between Nazis and normal Republicans, but remember this a difference.

A normal Republican will say they want to genocide blacks and LGBTQs and Leftists and non-Christians, in order to gain power and wealth, because they are stupid and amoral.

But Dumpies actually are driven by their fanaticism to genocide blacks and LGBTQs and Leftists and non-Christians, because they are stupid and mentally ill.

I am glad Drew recognizes this difference.

Are you ****ing serious? You realize we as Democrats lose Pennsylvania handily and probably Georgia too in this midterm environment if "normal" Republicans you speak of were elected? Hell, Sununu would have crushed Hassan had he ran in New Hampshire. Does having Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell in 2022 serve us better than Schumer? There's still a chance we lose Pennsylvania and Georgia since it's still early, but we'd have definitely lost them if someone of Kemp's type ran in either Senate seat.

[dxmnkd316]

Columbia	67.8%	18486	29.5%	8034	2.7%	743	0.0%	0	42.5%	42.5%	64148.24	36885.24	43496.47	18903.53	1748.235	0	76.1%	21.2%	2.7%	0.0%	46,573	15,836	1,739	0
Cook	71.2%	3944	27.0%	1497	1.7%	96	0.0%	0	91.7%	91.7%	6038.168	501.1679	4300.981	1632.497	104.6892	0	79.5%	18.7%	1.7%	0.0%	4,343	1,590	105	0
Coweta	65.4%	41499	31.8%	20147	2.6%	1673	0.2%	116	95.0%	95.0%	66773.68	3338.684	43683.16	21207.37	1761.053	122.1053	73.7%	23.5%	2.6%	0.2%	43,961	20,930	1,760	123
Crawford	71.5%	3438	26.9%	1295	1.6%	78	0.0%	0	93.7%	93.7%	5134.472	323.4717	3669.157	1382.07	83.2444	0	79.8%	18.6%	1.6%	0.0%	3,696	1,355	83	0
Crisp	64.3%	4057	34.3%	2163	1.3%	84	0.1%	6	86.0%	86.0%	7337.209	1027.209	4717.442	2515.116	97.67442	6.976744	72.6%	26.0%	1.3%	0.1%	4,803	2,430	97	7
Dade	80.7%	4695	17.1%	996	2.2%	127	0.0%	0	95.0%	95.0%	6124.211	306.2105	4942.105	1048.421	133.6842	0	89.0%	8.8%	2.2%	0.0%	4,968	1,023	134	0
Dawson	80.6%	11168	16.3%	2257	2.9%	407	0.2%	25	95.0%	95.0%	14586.32	729.3158	11755.79	2375.789	428.4211	26.31579	88.9%	8.0%	2.9%	0.2%	11,817	2,315	428	26
Decatur	61.4%	5403	37.4%	3293	1.2%	102	0.0%	4	92.5%	92.5%	9515.676	713.6757	5841.081	3560	110.2703	4.324324	69.7%	29.1%	1.2%	0.0%	5,901	3,500	111	4
DeKalb	11.8%	26109	87.0%	192485	1.2%	2625	0.1%	189	68.0%	68.0%	325600	104192	38395.59	283066.2	3860.294	277.9412	20.1%	78.7%	1.2%	0.1%	47,100	274,436	3,875	293
Dodge	75.5%	4702	23.4%	1458	1.1%	71	0.0%	0	84.8%	84.8%	7347.877	1116.877	5544.811	1719.34	83.72642	0	83.8%	15.1%	1.1%	0.0%	5,638	1,626	83	0
Dooly	54.4%	1784	44.6%	1461	1.0%	32	0.0%	0	83.0%	83.0%	3948.193	671.1928	2149.398	1760.241	38.55422	0	62.7%	36.3%	1.0%	0.0%	2,205	1,704	39	0
Dougherty	30.4%	7394	68.6%	16693	1.0%	232	0.1%	22	74.4%	74.4%	32716.4	8375.398	9938.172	22436.83	311.828	29.56989	38.7%	60.3%	1.0%	0.1%	10,639	21,739	316	30
Douglas	33.3%	17573	64.7%	34095	1.9%	998	0.1%	59	91.7%	91.7%	57497.27	4772.274	19163.58	37181.03	1088.332	64.34024	41.6%	56.4%	1.9%	0.1%	19,560	36,784	1,089	64
Early	56.8%	2205	42.5%	1650	0.7%	28	0.0%	0	90.2%	90.2%	4304.878	421.878	2444.568	1829.268	31.04213	0	65.1%	34.2%	0.7%	0.0%	2,480	1,794	31	0
Echols	88.4%	937	9.4%	100	2.2%	23	0.0%	0	89.1%	89.1%	1189.675	129.6745	1051.627	112.2334	25.81369	0	96.7%	1.1%	2.2%	0.0%	1,062	101	26	0
Effingham	72.0%	18220	25.5%	6468	2.4%	604	0.1%	26	95.0%	95.0%	26650.53	1332.526	19178.95	6808.421	635.7895	27.36842	80.3%	17.2%	2.4%	0.1%	19,291	6,697	636	27
Elbert	70.3%	5129	28.4%	2069	1.2%	90	0.1%	7	94.9%	94.9%	7687.039	392.039	5404.636	2180.19	94.83667	7.376185	78.6%	20.1%	1.2%	0.1%	5,437	2,148	95	7
Emanuel	70.6%	5322	28.6%	2157	0.8%	58	0.0%	2	93.8%	93.8%	8037.313	498.3134	5673.774	2299.574	61.83369	2.132196	78.9%	20.3%	0.8%	0.0%	5,715	2,258	62	2
Evans	69.4%	2314	29.0%	968	1.6%	54	0.0%	1	93.0%	93.0%	3588.172	251.172	2488.172	1040.86	58.06452	1.075269	77.7%	20.7%	1.6%	0.0%	2,509	1,020	58	1
Fannin	77.9%	7426	19.8%	1886	2.3%	220	0.0%	0	81.6%	81.6%	11681.37	2149.373	9100.49	2311.275	269.6078	0	86.2%	11.5%	2.3%	0.0%	9,280	2,132	269	0
Fayette	48.9%	22419	48.9%	22421	2.1%	976	0.0%	0	75.9%	75.9%	60363.64	14547.64	29537.55	29540.18	1285.903	0	57.2%	40.6%	2.1%	0.0%	30,747	28,321	1,282	0
Floyd	68.8%	21885	28.7%	9133	2.6%	813	0.1%	43	95.0%	95.0%	33551.58	1677.579	23036.84	9613.684	855.7895	45.26316	77.1%	20.4%	2.6%	0.1%	23,179	9,474	857	45
Forsyth	65.6%	47045	31.8%	22782	2.6%	1859	0.0%	0	73.8%	73.8%	97135.5	25449.5	63746.61	30869.92	2518.97	0	73.9%	23.5%	2.6%	0.0%	65,864	28,751	2,521	0
Franklin	84.6%	7374	13.4%	1166	1.9%	164	0.1%	9	99.0%	100.0%	8713	0	7374	1166	164	9	92.9%	5.1%	1.9%	0.1%	7,374	1,166	164	9
Fulton	24.4%	91520	73.8%	276791	1.8%	6582	0.0%	0	85.0%	85.0%	441050.6	66157.59	107670.6	325636.5	7743.529	0	32.7%	65.5%	1.8%	0.0%	113,184	320,093	7,773	0
Gilmer	79.6%	11143	18.0%	2513	2.3%	325	0.1%	17	95.0%	95.0%	14734.74	736.7368	11729.47	2645.263	342.1053	17.89474	87.9%	9.7%	2.3%	0.1%	11,791	2,584	342	18
Glascock	90.4%	1171	8.7%	113	0.8%	11	0.0%	0	98.9%	100.0%	1295	0	1171	113	11	0	98.7%	0.4%	0.8%	0.0%	1,171	113	11	0
Glynn	62.6%	20710	35.6%	11799	1.8%	596	0.0%	0	95.0%	95.0%	34847.37	1742.368	21800	12420	627.3684	0	70.9%	27.3%	1.8%	0.0%	21,946	12,274	627	0
Gordon	79.6%	14943	17.8%	3349	2.5%	475	0.2%	20	95.0%	95.0%	19775.79	988.7895	15729.47	3525.263	500	21.05263	87.9%	9.5%	2.5%	0.2%	15,813	3,442	500	22
Grady	67.0%	5378	31.8%	2549	1.2%	99	0.1%	5	92.1%	92.1%	8719.87	688.8697	5839.305	2767.644	107.4919	5.428882	75.3%	23.5%	1.2%	0.1%	5,897	2,711	107	6
Greene	64.6%	6740	33.7%	3520	1.5%	156	0.2%	16	99.0%	100.0%	10432	0	6740	3520	156	16	72.9%	25.4%	1.5%	0.2%	6,740	3,520	156	16
Gwinnett	36.5%	64420	61.4%	108230	2.1%	3716	0.0%	0	53.8%	53.8%	327817.8	151451.8	119739.8	201171	6907.063	0	44.8%	53.1%	2.1%	0.0%	132,341	188,580	6,896	0
Habersham	80.1%	13501	17.1%	2884	2.8%	478	0.0%	0	95.0%	95.0%	17750.53	887.5263	14211.58	3035.789	503.1579	0	88.4%	8.8%	2.8%	0.0%	14,286	2,962	503	0
Hall	70.7%	51621	26.3%	19173	3.0%	2162	0.1%	67	99.0%	100.0%	73023	0	51621	19173	2162	67	79.0%	18.0%	3.0%	0.1%	51,621	19,173	2,162	67
Hancock	29.2%	989	69.9%	2371	0.9%	30	0.0%	0	91.8%	91.8%	3692.81	302.8105	1077.342	2582.789	32.67974	0	37.5%	61.6%	0.9%	0.0%	1,103	2,557	33	0

[dxmnkd316]

Haralson	84.3%	9786	12.9%	1496	2.7%	308	0.1%	16	99.0%	100.0%	11606	0	9786	1496	308	16	92.6%	4.6%	2.7%	0.1%	9,786	1,496	308	16
Harris	71.1%	12068	26.8%	4542	2.0%	338	0.1%	24	99.0%	100.0%	16972	0	12068	4542	338	24	79.4%	18.5%	2.0%	0.1%	12,068	4,542	338	24
Hart	76.1%	7977	22.1%	2319	1.8%	192	0.0%	0	99.0%	100.0%	10488	0	7977	2319	192	0	84.4%	13.8%	1.8%	0.0%	7,977	2,319	192	0
Heard	82.6%	3672	15.2%	674	2.1%	92	0.2%	8	99.0%	100.0%	4446	0	3672	674	92	8	90.9%	6.9%	2.1%	0.2%	3,672	674	92	8
Henry	46.0%	52695	52.6%	60299	1.4%	1640	0.0%	0	95.0%	95.0%	120667.4	6033.368	55468.42	63472.63	1726.316	0	54.3%	44.3%	1.4%	0.0%	55,974	62,969	1,724	0
Houston	54.6%	32225	43.4%	25629	1.9%	1095	0.1%	61	95.7%	100.0%	59010	0	32225	25629	1095	61	62.9%	35.1%	1.9%	0.1%	32,225	25,629	1,095	61
Irwin	76.4%	2601	22.2%	757	1.4%	46	0.0%	0	91.8%	91.8%	3708.061	304.061	2833.333	824.6187	50.10893	0	84.7%	13.9%	1.4%	0.0%	2,859	799	50	0
Jackson	76.9%	24373	20.5%	6498	2.6%	822	0.0%	0	99.0%	100.0%	31693	0	24373	6498	822	0	85.2%	12.2%	2.6%	0.0%	24,373	6,498	822	0
Jasper	75.7%	4944	22.4%	1464	1.8%	120	0.0%	0	95.0%	95.0%	6871.579	343.5789	5204.211	1541.053	126.3158	0	84.0%	14.1%	1.8%	0.0%	5,233	1,512	126	0
Jeff Davis	82.5%	3737	16.3%	738	1.1%	52	0.0%	1	90.4%	90.4%	5008.85	480.8496	4133.85	816.3717	57.52212	1.106195	90.8%	8.0%	1.1%	0.0%	4,174	776	57	1
Jefferson	48.6%	3040	50.5%	3158	0.9%	54	0.0%	2	88.8%	88.8%	7042.793	788.7928	3423.423	3556.306	60.81081	2.252252	56.9%	42.2%	0.9%	0.0%	3,489	3,491	61	2
Jenkins	66.0%	1824	33.0%	912	0.9%	25	0.1%	2	92.4%	92.4%	2990.26	227.2597	1974.026	987.013	27.05628	2.164502	74.3%	24.7%	0.9%	0.1%	1,993	968	27	2
Johnson	73.7%	2482	25.8%	869	0.5%	17	0.0%	0	92.9%	92.9%	3625.404	257.4037	2671.69	935.4144	18.29925	0	82.0%	17.5%	0.5%	0.0%	2,693	914	18	0
Jones	68.0%	7316	30.5%	3283	1.5%	162	0.1%	9	83.1%	83.1%	12960.29	2190.289	8803.851	3950.662	194.9458	10.83032	76.3%	22.2%	1.5%	0.1%	8,988	3,768	195	11
Lamar	70.1%	5410	27.7%	2138	2.0%	158	0.1%	9	95.0%	95.0%	8121.053	406.0526	5694.737	2250.526	166.3158	9.473684	78.4%	19.4%	2.0%	0.1%	5,729	2,217	166	9
Lanier	70.8%	1860	27.6%	725	1.4%	38	0.1%	3	94.1%	94.1%	2790.648	164.6482	1976.621	770.457	40.38257	3.188098	79.1%	19.3%	1.4%	0.1%	1,990	757	40	3
Laurens	65.2%	12064	34.0%	6283	0.8%	155	0.0%	0	93.8%	93.8%	19724.95	1222.947	12861.41	6698.294	165.2452	0	73.5%	25.7%	0.8%	0.0%	12,963	6,597	165	0
Lee	70.5%	9532	27.9%	3775	1.6%	221	0.0%	0	95.9%	100.0%	13528	0	9532	3775	221	0	78.8%	19.6%	1.6%	0.0%	9,532	3,775	221	0
Liberty	35.7%	5487	62.5%	9604	1.7%	263	0.1%	17	96.1%	100.0%	15371	0	5487	9604	263	17	44.0%	54.2%	1.7%	0.1%	5,487	9,604	263	17
Lincoln	71.7%	2846	27.1%	1077	1.2%	49	0.0%	0	95.0%	95.0%	4181.053	209.0526	2995.789	1133.684	51.57895	0	80.0%	18.8%	1.2%	0.0%	3,013	1,116	52	0
Long	62.6%	2753	35.1%	1543	2.2%	95	0.2%	7	99.0%	100.0%	4398	0	2753	1543	95	7	70.9%	26.8%	2.2%	0.2%	2,753	1,543	95	7
Lowndes	58.4%	20160	40.0%	13791	1.6%	545	0.0%	0	92.7%	92.7%	37212.51	2716.513	21747.57	14877.02	587.918	0	66.7%	31.7%	1.6%	0.0%	21,973	14,651	588	0
Lumpkin	78.2%	9428	18.9%	2275	2.9%	349	0.1%	11	95.0%	95.0%	12697.89	634.8947	9924.211	2394.737	367.3684	11.57895	86.5%	10.6%	2.9%	0.1%	9,977	2,342	367	12
Macon	38.8%	1460	60.3%	2269	0.8%	32	0.1%	4	85.8%	85.8%	4388.112	623.1119	1701.632	2644.522	37.29604	4.662005	47.1%	52.0%	0.8%	0.1%	1,754	2,593	37	5
Madison	74.8%	9345	22.9%	2861	2.1%	262	0.2%	23	99.0%	100.0%	12491	0	9345	2861	262	23	83.1%	14.6%	2.1%	0.2%	9,345	2,861	262	23
Marion	61.7%	1750	35.9%	1018	2.3%	66	0.0%	1	93.0%	93.0%	3048.387	213.3871	1881.72	1094.624	70.96774	1.075269	70.0%	27.6%	2.3%	0.0%	1,899	1,077	71	1
McDuffie	61.0%	5067	37.4%	3101	1.6%	130	0.0%	3	90.7%	90.7%	9152.15	851.1499	5586.549	3418.964	143.3297	3.307607	69.3%	29.1%	1.6%	0.0%	5,657	3,348	144	3
McIntosh	61.0%	3343	37.3%	2045	1.7%	95	0.1%	5	97.4%	100.0%	5488	0	3343	2045	95	5	69.3%	29.0%	1.7%	0.1%	3,343	2,045	95	5
Meriwether	60.1%	5334	37.9%	3361	2.0%	175	0.1%	9	98.6%	100.0%	8879	0	5334	3361	175	9	68.4%	29.6%	2.0%	0.1%	5,334	3,361	175	9
Miller	75.3%	1617	23.7%	509	1.0%	22	0.0%	0	89.2%	89.2%	2408.072	260.0717	1812.78	570.6278	24.66368	0	83.6%	15.4%	1.0%	0.0%	1,835	549	25	0
Mitchell	56.7%	3962	42.2%	2946	1.2%	81	0.0%	0	90.1%	90.1%	7756.937	767.9367	4397.336	3269.7	89.90011	0	65.0%	33.9%	1.2%	0.0%	4,462	3,206	90	0
Monroe	70.8%	9669	27.3%	3735	1.9%	255	0.1%	5	99.0%	100.0%	13664	0	9669	3735	255	5	79.1%	19.0%	1.9%	0.1%	9,669	3,735	255	5
Montgomery	75.9%	2450	23.0%	742	1.1%	34	0.0%	0	87.9%	87.9%	3670.08	444.0796	2787.258	844.1411	38.68032	0	84.2%	14.7%	1.1%	0.0%	2,824	807	39	0
Morgan	71.3%	7315	26.9%	2758	1.7%	174	0.1%	15	99.0%	100.0%	10262	0	7315	2758	174	15	79.6%	18.6%	1.7%	0.1%	7,315	2,758	174	15
Murray	85.1%	8650	13.3%	1351	1.6%	167	0.0%	0	88.1%	88.1%	11541.43	1373.43	9818.388	1533.485	189.5573	0	93.4%	5.0%	1.6%	0.0%	9,933	1,419	189	0

[dxmnkd316]

Muscogee	36.6%	21376	61.9%	36167	1.5%	876	0.1%	56	88.8%	88.8%	65850.23	7375.225	24072.07	40728.6	986.4865	63.06306	44.9%	53.6%	1.5%	0.1%	24,691	40,117	987	63
Newton	40.5%	14866	57.7%	21143	1.8%	656	0.0%	0	81.7%	81.7%	44877.6	8212.601	18195.84	25878.82	802.9376	0	48.8%	49.4%	1.8%	0.0%	18,878	25,196	804	0
Oconee	65.7%	14677	31.3%	6984	2.8%	615	0.2%	51	95.7%	100.0%	22327	0	14677	6984	615	51	74.0%	23.0%	2.8%	0.2%	14,677	6,984	615	51
Oglethorpe	68.3%	4636	29.4%	1995	2.2%	152	0.1%	5	95.0%	95.0%	7145.263	357.2632	4880	2100	160	5.263158	76.6%	21.1%	2.2%	0.1%	4,910	2,070	160	5
Paulding	61.0%	40647	36.5%	24336	2.4%	1632	0.0%	0	99.0%	100.0%	66615	0	40647	24336	1632	0	69.3%	28.2%	2.4%	0.0%	40,647	24,336	1,632	0
Peach	51.5%	5149	47.0%	4695	1.4%	143	0.1%	11	92.0%	92.0%	10867.39	869.3913	5596.739	5103.261	155.4348	11.95652	59.8%	38.7%	1.4%	0.1%	5,669	5,031	155	12
Pickens	81.6%	11718	15.9%	2286	2.4%	347	0.1%	12	95.0%	95.0%	15118.95	755.9474	12334.74	2406.316	365.2632	12.63158	89.9%	7.6%	2.4%	0.1%	12,398	2,343	365	13
Pierce	88.3%	6325	10.9%	779	0.9%	63	0.0%	0	99.0%	100.0%	7167	0	6325	779	63	0	96.6%	2.6%	0.9%	0.0%	6,325	779	63	0
Pike	84.6%	7947	13.4%	1257	2.0%	191	0.0%	4	99.0%	100.0%	9399	0	7947	1257	191	4	92.9%	5.1%	2.0%	0.0%	7,947	1,257	191	4
Polk	76.7%	10398	20.6%	2791	2.5%	342	0.2%	21	95.0%	95.0%	14265.26	713.2632	10945.26	2937.895	360	22.10526	85.0%	12.3%	2.5%	0.2%	11,005	2,878	360	22
Pulaski	68.9%	2318	29.8%	1001	1.3%	44	0.0%	0	89.2%	89.2%	3770.179	407.1794	2598.655	1122.197	49.32735	0	77.2%	21.5%	1.3%	0.0%	2,633	1,088	49	0
Putnam	70.2%	7152	27.9%	2842	1.9%	191	0.0%	0	95.0%	95.0%	10721.05	536.0526	7528.421	2991.579	201.0526	0	78.5%	19.6%	1.9%	0.0%	7,573	2,947	201	0
Quitman	56.7%	511	41.9%	378	1.4%	13	0.0%	0	92.1%	92.1%	979.3702	77.37025	554.8317	410.4235	14.11509	0	65.0%	33.6%	1.4%	0.0%	561	404	14	0
Rabun	75.3%	6179	22.0%	1804	2.7%	223	0.0%	0	95.0%	95.0%	8637.895	431.8947	6504.211	1898.947	234.7368	0	83.6%	13.7%	2.7%	0.0%	6,540	1,863	235	0
Randolph	45.4%	1157	53.6%	1365	0.9%	23	0.1%	2	87.7%	87.7%	2904.219	357.2189	1319.27	1556.442	26.22577	2.280502	53.7%	45.3%	0.9%	0.1%	1,349	1,527	26	2
Richmond	30.5%	19487	68.1%	43502	1.4%	880	0.0%	0	87.5%	87.5%	72993.14	9124.143	22270.86	49716.57	1005.714	0	38.8%	59.8%	1.4%	0.0%	23,031	48,954	1,008	0
Rockdale	25.1%	8708	73.3%	25421	1.6%	572	0.0%	0	91.0%	91.0%	38132.97	3431.967	9569.231	27935.16	628.5714	0	33.4%	65.0%	1.6%	0.0%	9,856	27,650	627	0
Schley	78.4%	1467	20.5%	384	1.0%	19	0.0%	0	92.9%	92.9%	2012.917	142.9171	1579.117	413.3477	20.4521	0	86.7%	12.2%	1.0%	0.0%	1,591	401	20	0
Screven	60.7%	3201	37.9%	2001	1.4%	72	0.1%	3	93.7%	93.7%	5631.804	354.8036	3416.222	2135.539	76.84098	3.201708	69.0%	29.6%	1.4%	0.1%	3,446	2,106	77	3
Seminole	71.0%	2150	27.3%	827	1.5%	44	0.2%	6	90.1%	90.1%	3359.6	332.6004	2386.238	917.869	48.83463	6.659267	79.3%	19.0%	1.5%	0.2%	2,414	890	49	7
Spalding	57.1%	9611	40.5%	6822	2.5%	413	0.2%	19	66.3%	66.3%	25437.41	8572.406	14496.23	10289.59	622.9261	28.65762	65.4%	32.2%	2.5%	0.2%	15,221	9,578	627	36
Stephens	0.0%	0	0.0%	0	0.0%	0	0.0%	0	0.0%	0.0%							8.3%	-8.3%	0.0%	0.0%
Stewart	40.5%	632	58.7%	915	0.8%	13	0.0%	0	82.4%	82.4%	1893.204	333.2039	766.9903	1110.437	15.7767	0	48.8%	50.4%	0.8%	0.0%	795	1,083	16	0
Sumter	0.0%	0	0.0%	0	0.0%	0	0.0%	0	0.0%	0.0%							8.3%	-8.3%	0.0%	0.0%
Talbot	39.2%	1118	59.2%	1688	1.5%	43	0.0%	0	92.7%	92.7%	3073.355	224.3549	1206.041	1820.928	46.38619	0	47.5%	50.9%	1.5%	0.0%	1,225	1,802	46	0
Taliaferro	38.9%	310	60.6%	482	0.5%	4	0.0%	0	83.1%	83.1%	957.8821	161.8821	373.0445	580.0241	4.813478	0	47.2%	52.3%	0.5%	0.0%	386	567	5	0
Tattnall	74.9%	4865	23.5%	1525	1.7%	109	0.0%	0	93.9%	93.9%	6921.193	422.1928	5181.044	1624.068	116.0809	0	83.2%	15.2%	1.7%	0.0%	5,216	1,589	116	0
Taylor	63.2%	2014	35.7%	1137	1.1%	35	0.0%	0	92.9%	92.9%	3429.494	243.4941	2167.922	1223.897	37.67492	0	71.5%	27.4%	1.1%	0.0%	2,188	1,204	38	0
Telfair	68.8%	2340	30.4%	1032	0.8%	28	0.1%	1	89.9%	89.9%	3783.092	382.0923	2602.892	1147.942	31.14572	1.112347	77.1%	22.1%	0.8%	0.1%	2,635	1,116	31	1
Terrell	46.6%	1709	52.3%	1920	1.1%	40	0.0%	0	89.5%	89.5%	4099.441	430.4413	1909.497	2145.251	44.69274	0	54.9%	44.0%	1.1%	0.0%	1,946	2,109	45	0
Thomas	61.0%	10476	37.5%	6431	1.5%	262	0.0%	0	95.7%	100.0%	17169	0	10476	6431	262	0	69.3%	29.2%	1.5%	0.0%	10,476	6,431	262	0
Tift	68.8%	8914	29.9%	3872	1.4%	176	0.0%	0	91.1%	91.1%	14228.32	1266.321	9784.852	4250.274	193.1943	0	77.1%	21.6%	1.4%	0.0%	9,891	4,145	194	0
Toombs	74.5%	6296	24.4%	2059	1.2%	100	0.0%	0	91.7%	91.7%	9220.284	765.2835	6865.867	2245.365	109.0513	0	82.8%	16.1%	1.2%	0.0%	6,930	2,182	109	0
Towns	78.2%	5565	19.1%	1358	2.5%	178	0.2%	13	99.0%	100.0%	7114	0	5565	1358	178	13	86.5%	10.8%	2.5%	0.2%	5,565	1,358	178	13
Treutlen	70.4%	1721	29.1%	710	0.5%	12	0.0%	0	89.8%	89.8%	2720.49	277.49	1916.481	790.6459	13.36303	0	78.7%	20.8%	0.5%	0.0%	1,940	768	13	0

[dxmnkd316]

Troup	60.1%	13927	38.0%	8797	1.8%	426	0.1%	15	93.1%	93.1%	24881.85	1716.847	14959.18	9448.98	457.5725	16.11171	68.4%	29.7%	1.8%	0.1%	15,102	9,306	457	17
Turner	61.6%	1873	37.1%	1128	1.3%	41	0.0%	0	89.3%	89.3%	3406.495	364.495	2097.424	1263.158	45.91265	0	69.9%	28.8%	1.3%	0.0%	2,128	1,233	46	0
Twiggs	53.5%	1886	45.3%	1596	1.3%	45	0.0%	0	89.4%	89.4%	3945.19	418.1902	2109.62	1785.235	50.33557	0	61.8%	37.0%	1.3%	0.0%	2,145	1,751	50	0
Union	78.7%	11182	18.4%	2620	2.7%	378	0.2%	27	99.0%	100.0%	14207	0	11182	2620	378	27	87.0%	10.1%	2.7%	0.2%	11,182	2,620	378	27
Upson	66.3%	6684	31.5%	3171	2.0%	205	0.2%	17	91.6%	91.6%	11001.09	924.0917	7296.943	3461.79	223.7991	18.55895	74.6%	23.2%	2.0%	0.2%	7,374	3,385	223	19
Walker	77.5%	17053	19.9%	4377	2.4%	531	0.2%	35	95.0%	95.0%	23153.68	1157.684	17950.53	4607.368	558.9474	36.84211	85.8%	11.6%	2.4%	0.2%	18,047	4,511	559	37
Walton	49.2%	912	47.5%	882	3.3%	61	0.0%	0	4.6%	4.6%	40326.09	38471.09	19826.09	19173.91	1326.087	0	57.5%	39.2%	3.3%	0.0%	23,051	15,945	1,331	0
Ware	70.6%	7563	27.7%	2968	1.5%	161	0.1%	13	93.4%	93.4%	11461.46	756.4561	8097.43	3177.73	172.3769	13.91863	78.9%	19.4%	1.5%	0.1%	8,160	3,114	172	14
Warren	46.9%	1007	52.0%	1116	1.2%	25	0.0%	0	91.3%	91.3%	2352.683	204.6835	1102.957	1222.344	27.38226	0	55.2%	43.7%	1.2%	0.0%	1,120	1,205	27	0
Washington	50.2%	3901	48.8%	3791	0.8%	66	0.1%	8	91.3%	91.3%	8506.024	740.0241	4272.727	4152.245	72.28916	8.762322	58.5%	40.5%	0.8%	0.1%	4,334	4,090	72	9
Wayne	78.4%	7837	20.1%	2012	1.4%	136	0.1%	7	94.8%	94.8%	10540.08	548.0844	8266.878	2122.363	143.4599	7.383966	86.7%	11.8%	1.4%	0.1%	8,312	2,076	144	8
Webster	59.9%	676	39.1%	441	0.6%	7	0.4%	4	98.5%	100.0%	1128	0	676	441	7	4	68.2%	30.8%	0.6%	0.4%	676	441	7	4
Wheeler	69.7%	1266	29.4%	534	0.9%	17	0.0%	0	90.4%	90.4%	2009.956	192.9558	1400.442	590.708	18.80531	0	78.0%	21.1%	0.9%	0.0%	1,417	575	19	0
White	81.0%	10247	16.3%	2062	2.7%	347	0.0%	2	95.0%	95.0%	13324.21	666.2105	10786.32	2170.526	365.2632	2.105263	89.3%	8.0%	2.7%	0.0%	10,842	2,115	365	2
Whitfield	72.0%	19369	25.6%	6893	2.2%	597	0.1%	29	94.5%	94.5%	28452.91	1564.91	20496.3	7294.18	631.746	30.68783	80.3%	17.3%	2.2%	0.1%	20,626	7,163	631	31
Wilcox	74.5%	1947	24.6%	644	0.8%	22	0.0%	0	89.2%	89.2%	2929.372	316.3722	2182.735	721.9731	24.66368	0	82.8%	16.3%	0.8%	0.0%	2,209	695	25	0
Wilkes	58.1%	2401	40.6%	1679	1.1%	46	0.2%	10	90.8%	90.8%	4555.066	419.0661	2644.273	1849.119	50.66079	11.01322	66.4%	32.3%	1.1%	0.2%	2,679	1,814	51	11
Wilkinson	56.2%	2271	42.7%	1728	1.1%	43	0.0%	2	91.1%	91.1%	4439.078	395.0779	2492.865	1896.817	47.20088	2.19539	64.5%	34.4%	1.1%	0.0%	2,526	1,864	47	2
Worth	73.6%	5410	25.0%	1840	1.4%	100	0.0%	0	90.0%	90.0%	8166.667	816.6667	6011.111	2044.444	111.1111	0	81.9%	16.7%	1.4%	0.0%	6,079	1,976	111	0

[dxmnkd316]

Additionally, while in some places the early/mail-in comes in first, in others (possibly within the same state) the mail-in comes in late, so the remaining chunks are likely to be D.

God, it's a wonder how you and I know these obvious things without "read your amortization tables" dip**** telling us!!!!

LOL!!!!

Right???

[Kepler]

Per MSNBC, we may steal 2 ILL seats which we gerrymandered. One rat****ing deserves another. There are 3-6 Dem pickups which would then force the GOP to come up with even more gains. 5 D seats are at risk in NY and we must hold those.

IF we do, CA has 4 GOP incumbencies which Biden won. Those counts will take weeks. So we may not know who holds the House until after Thanksgiving. AND THAT WILL BE FUN.