SCOTUS, Now with KBJ

[aparch]

https://twitter.com/willy_lowry/stat...17935155679237

Elizabeth Warren looks so distraught she could choke out Susan Collins with one hand.

And do the same to Lisa Murkowski in the other hand simultaneously.

While never breaking eye contact with Joe Manchin.

[ScoobyDoo]

https://twitter.com/willy_lowry/stat...17935155679237

Elizabeth Warren looks so distraught she could choke out Susan Collins with one hand.

And do the same to Lisa Murkowski in the other hand simultaneously.

While never breaking eye contact with Joe Manchin.

That's cause her life on the hill is hard. For those others who only really care about money, it's not so hard to cast those detached votes and cash their checks.

[Swansong]

I still don't understand the philosophy behind "court-granted" rights

the whole point is to determine if it was a right to begin with. Correct? And when they decided that the 14th granted that right, that's it. It did.

The right has confused "rights of people" with "ability to oppress people".

Do you have a right to an abortion? Nope. Do you have a right to ban abortions? Yes!

[rufus]

Somebody stayed at a Holiday Inn Express last night.

Congress would still have power to act under Article I.

Hasn't it been Sic the moron who's been saying for years that this day would never come, because both sides like the political fight it affords them too much? I know that's Hovey's view too.

Yeah, shows what he knows. Almost as dumb as Drew.

[rufus]

yep, and I think Kepler said it even earlier than me

Originally posted by dxmnkd316 View Post
Deeply rooted in history is very thinly veiled threat to all post reconstruction rights. Every single one of them.

You mean like giving the darkies the vote?

[dxmnkd316]

The right has confused "rights of people" with "ability to oppress people".

Do you have a right to an abortion? Nope. Do you have a right to ban abortions? Yes!

Right?! It's just the dumbest possible logic and it works so well on Cletus and his broodsows.

[dxmnkd316]

You mean like giving the darkies the vote?

Voting? Ha. They already ****ed the VRA. The end goal is to make sure they're not even citizens.

[The Sicatoka]

The Federal government certainly has the power to decide the issue. All Congress has to do is pass a law.

You are correct; Congress would need to act. However, they have not. And if they did, SCOTUS would have to press the law against A10.

In light of Congress' inaction, a prior SCOTUS made a decision. This SCOTUS is questioning that decision/action.


Again, this will all fall back to the several States under A10.

Roe isn't going away; it's becoming State law.

[FadeToBlack&Gold]

I still don't understand the philosophy behind "court-granted" rights

the whole point is to determine if it was a right to begin with. Correct? And when they decided that the 14th granted that right, that's it. It did.

If the Roberts court decides that the Burger court was wrong in the way it originally interpreted the law when it decided Roe, then it can write a new opinion that sets a new precedent. So the self-proclaimed "strict constructionists" could issue a new majority opinion based on the 10th Amendment and basically tell states to do whatever they please with abortion regulations because the Constitution doesn't explicitly say anything about abortion.

[dxmnkd316]

If the Roberts court decides that the Burger court was wrong in the way it originally interpreted the law when it decided Roe, then it can write a new opinion that sets a new precedent. So the self-proclaimed "strict constructionists" could issue a new majority opinion based on the 10th Amendment and basically tell states to do whatever they please with abortion regulations because the Constitution doesn't explicitly say anything about abortion.

Yeah, it was my roundabout way of saying they're full of sh-it and always have been.

[ScoobyDoo]

Roe isn't going away; it's becoming State law.

Feel free to explain that to the woman who was raped or raped by her dad or is dying from pregnancy. Make sure when you do it's in a non-Roe state.

[The Sicatoka]

If the Roberts court decides that the Burger court was wrong in the way it originally interpreted the law when it decided Roe, then it can write a new opinion that sets a new precedent. So the self-proclaimed "strict constructionists" could issue a new majority opinion based on the 10th Amendment and basically tell states to do whatever they please with abortion regulations because the Constitution doesn't explicitly say anything about abortion.

There are now 50 states worth of court cases to be litigated and thousands upon thousands of billable hours for the attorneys.

Follow the money.

[The Sicatoka]

Feel free to explain that to the woman who was raped or raped by her dad or is dying from pregnancy. Make sure when you do it's in a non-Roe state.

One can still cross a state line. Or even move (as I said).

[dxmnkd316]

There are now 50 states worth of court cases to be litigated and thousands upon thousands of billable hours for the attorneys.

Follow the money.

This is nonsensical even by your standards. Some cabal of lawyers schemed to get more caseloads by depriving women of their god-given rights of self determination and agency? Get the **** out of here with that.

[dxmnkd316]

One can still cross a state line. Or even move (as I said).

Hey, cool that you're white and rich. And what happens when you go out of state and texas decides it's still a felony to do that?