Nothing in this Constitution shall be construed to forbid Congress or the States from imposing reasonable viewpoint-neutral limitations on private campaign contributions or independent election expenditures, or from enacting systems of public campaign financing, including those designed to restrict the influence of private wealth by offsetting campaign spending or independent expenditures with increased public funding.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
SCOTUS, Now with KBJ
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
-
Wonder if the bloated, wrinkled blonde wife was questioned?
Leave a comment:
-
Seriously. "We're honest, just ask us!" It's amazing what you find when you don't look.
Leave a comment:
-
The internal investigation by the police department failed to find evidence of police brutality.
- 1 like
Leave a comment:
-
The New York Times
@nytimes
Breaking News: The Supreme Court announced that an internal investigation had failed to identify who leaked a draft of its opinion overturning Roe v. Wade.
...because Roberts won't let them announce "It was Alito" and make the SCOTUS even more of a hated joke.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by dxmnkd316 View Post
This is more vile than any of the state challenges. Truly gross stuff here.
- 1 like
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by psych View PostLooks like the Supreme Court is taking up the other student loan case as well.
https://www.cnn.com/2022/12/12/polit...nge/index.html
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by psych View PostLooks like the Supreme Court is taking up the other student loan case as well.
https://www.cnn.com/2022/12/12/polit...nge/index.html
Leave a comment:
-
Looks like the Supreme Court is taking up the other student loan case as well.
https://www.cnn.com/2022/12/12/polit...nge/index.html
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Deutsche Gopher Fan View Post
That makes a lot more sense
i had read first piece as like not disclosing on taxes. Like we know at least one sc has been lying about spousal income
I'm sure I'd feel different if I were a judge. But when you pass legislation like this, you certainly open up the possibility that information about the judge, the judge's family or business dealings of the judge are much more difficult to make public, when they maybe should be made public due to possible corruption, etc...
- 1 like
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by SJHovey View Post
i had read first piece as like not disclosing on taxes. Like we know at least one sc has been lying about spousal income
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Deutsche Gopher Fan View Post
Leave a comment:
-
-
Originally posted by Kepler View Post
Apparently, G & K are in the tank on the nutbar theory, so everything I am reading says it's up to Barrett.
Jesus. Think about that. The fate of democracy hangs on someone not up to presiding over The People's Court.
Leave a comment:
-
Maybe we can convince her cult master...errrr...spiritual leader it's what Jesus would want!
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: