Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
SCOTUS, Now with KBJ
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
-
There's a YT video (possibly on TYT) of Alito crying that they're being unfairly scrutinized. He can gfh
- 2 likes
-
Originally posted by dxmnkd316 View PostYou think he cares?
Roberts appears not to care and without 67 votes in the Senate absolutely nothing is going to happen to Clarence. It's pretty amazing that we need a 2/3 majority of one party in a two party system to get any government at all. Cause right now, we have no government.
And what's most interesting is before GW I'd say, maybe a little after this would have been the end for him.
Leave a comment:
-
I dont think this is going to go away...every time they think the heat is dying down another accusation pops up. Sooner or later it is too much.
Leave a comment:
-
I agree with this take. A lot more will be uncovered.
but nothing will come of it, until someone gives kagan some free Kleenex and she’s shot by some right wing freak
https://twitter.com/theplumlinegs/st...3v2cVkMjQylOVg
Leave a comment:
-
Conservative justices' salaries are not their primary compensation. Cutting their funding won't touch their bribes and kickbacks.
Add justices and save the Court.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by SJHovey View Post
Since the Constitution says that the compensation paid to SCOTUS judges can't be cut during their tenure in office, any funding cuts will hit staff, so that plan sounds productive.
Leave a comment:
-
If you have the votes to cut their funding just add 20 Leftist justices.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by bronconick View PostSenate Dems are eying cutting Supreme Court funding until they adopt some ethics since you know, Congress "has the power of the purse". Maybe Roberts can just have Thomas' sugardaddy Crow cover the difference.
Leave a comment:
-
Senate Dems are eying cutting Supreme Court funding until they adopt some ethics since you know, Congress "has the power of the purse". Maybe Roberts can just have Thomas' sugardaddy Crow cover the difference.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Slap Shot View PostHarlan Crow's response:
Why is a kid being raised by a SC justice and millionaire wife considered at-risk? What are you trying to say about the Thomases, Haran?Last edited by ScoobyDoo; 05-04-2023, 09:28 AM.
Leave a comment:
-
That being a millionaire doesn't cut it anymore in this country. If you're not a billionaire, you're f-cked.
SCOTUS licking their lips at overturning the Chevron principle in Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo in the upcoming term. I'm sure putting all of the expertise eggs in the basket of the unelected judiciary will go swimmingly.
Leave a comment:
-
Harlan Crow's response:
“It’s disappointing that those with partisan political interests would try to turn helping at-risk youth with tuition assistance into something nefarious or political.”
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Deutsche Gopher Fan View PostThis is becoming a weekly post.
clarence Thomas apparently raised his grad nephew. Put him in very expensive private school, and Harlan crow picked up the tab
Leave a comment:
-
This is becoming a weekly post.
clarence Thomas apparently raised his grad nephew. Put him in very expensive private school, and Harlan crow picked up the tab
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: