Originally posted by Stauber1
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Election Day 2021
Collapse
X
-
“Demolish the bridges behind you… then there is no choice but to build again.”
Live Radio from 100.3
-
Originally posted by ScoobyDoo View PostNo. They're won and lost on fear. And Republicans have figured out how to make everyone afraid of things they shouldn't be afraid of (CRT) and not afraid of things they should be afraid of (Jan 6th). Why did "defund the police" get so much traction? Cause it made everyone afraid. Why did CRT get so much traction? Cause it made everyone afraid. Why did January 6th get zero traction? Cause no one is afraid of it.
A bad candidate, someone who is deeply embedded in politics and political issues on a national level, like McAuliffe, is going to say something like, "I don't think parents should be telling schools what they should teach the children."
That's the difference between winning and losing an election.That community is already in the process of dissolution where each man begins to eye his neighbor as a possible enemy, where non-conformity with the accepted creed, political as well as religious, is a mark of disaffection; where denunciation, without specification or backing, takes the place of evidence; where orthodoxy chokes freedom of dissent; where faith in the eventual supremacy of reason has become so timid that we dare not enter our convictions in the open lists, to win or lose.
Comment
-
Originally posted by ScoobyDoo View PostNo. They're won and lost on fear. And Republicans have figured out how to make everyone afraid of things they shouldn't be afraid of (CRT) and not afraid of things they should be afraid of (Jan 6th). Why did "defund the police" get so much traction? Cause it made everyone afraid. Why did CRT get so much traction? Cause it made everyone afraid. Why did January 6th get zero traction? Cause no one is afraid of it.Originally posted by BobbyBrady
Crosby probably wouldn't even be on BC's top two lines next year
Comment
-
Originally posted by psych View Post
So, the party out of power in the White House has won 11 of the last 12 Virginia Governor’s races. You think it comes down to local issues? Wouldn’t it be more likely that voter intensity of the opposite party, regardless of the issues or candidate, is powering those wins?
In one of the highest turnouts for a Virginia Governor’s race, Republicans won comfortably. Compared to 2020, 300,000 fewer Republican votes, and 800,000 fewer Democratic votes. Someone didn’t show up. You think Democrats didn’t show up over local issues?
For mid-term elections, sure national issues come to the forefront and can be more of a referendum on the party in power, but I do firmly believe that for local and statewide elections, it goes back to the individual candidates and their specific positions on issues of local importance.That community is already in the process of dissolution where each man begins to eye his neighbor as a possible enemy, where non-conformity with the accepted creed, political as well as religious, is a mark of disaffection; where denunciation, without specification or backing, takes the place of evidence; where orthodoxy chokes freedom of dissent; where faith in the eventual supremacy of reason has become so timid that we dare not enter our convictions in the open lists, to win or lose.
Comment
-
Originally posted by psych View PostIn one of the highest turnouts for a Virginia Governor’s race, Republicans won comfortably. Compared to 2020, 300,000 fewer Republican votes, and 800,000 fewer Democratic votes. Someone didn’t show up. You think Democrats didn’t show up over local issues?
Comment
-
Originally posted by SJHovey View Post
Look, a skilled candidate like Walz is not going to get tripped up over CRT. When someone brings it up, you're going to get an answer from him like, "we have a great education system here in Minnesota, and the education of our young people is my highest priority. We've got hardworking men and women, like you folks here, sitting on school boards making the best decision possible for the students in their district, and I support them on that."
A bad candidate, someone who is deeply embedded in politics and political issues on a national level, like McAuliffe, is going to say something like, "I don't think parents should be telling schools what they should teach the children."
That's the difference between winning and losing an election.**NOTE: The misleading post above was brought to you by Reynold's Wrap and American Steeples, makers of Crosses.
Originally Posted by dropthatpuck-Scooby's a lost cause.
Originally Posted by First Time, Long Time-Always knew you were nothing but a troll.
Comment
-
Originally posted by FadeToBlack&Gold View Post
Sounds to me like some Dem voters need to be reminded that choosing to stick your fingers in your ears and not to vote for the lesser of two turds today, doesn't mean you're going to magically wake up in the United States of Finland tomorrow. Now, could TM have run a better campaign, tacked further to the left on an issue or two to help motivate the base? Absolutely, and that is what is so maddening about Dems' continued insistence on running bland, milquetoast Clintonistas in purple states. Their era is over.**NOTE: The misleading post above was brought to you by Reynold's Wrap and American Steeples, makers of Crosses.
Originally Posted by dropthatpuck-Scooby's a lost cause.
Originally Posted by First Time, Long Time-Always knew you were nothing but a troll.
Comment
-
Cheap narratives continue to succeed at convincing Americans to vote against their own self interest. As Alabama’s Coach Saban tells his team after a loss: you never want to feel this way again. For Dems, there can be positivity in the loss if they figure out the problems.
Yeah, but they NEVER figure it out. So it keeps happening over and over and over again.**NOTE: The misleading post above was brought to you by Reynold's Wrap and American Steeples, makers of Crosses.
Originally Posted by dropthatpuck-Scooby's a lost cause.
Originally Posted by First Time, Long Time-Always knew you were nothing but a troll.
Comment
-
Originally posted by FadeToBlack&Gold View Post
Sounds to me like some Dem voters need to be reminded that choosing to stick your fingers in your ears and not to vote for the lesser of two turds today, doesn't mean you're going to magically wake up in the United States of Finland tomorrow. Now, could TM have run a better campaign, tacked further to the left on an issue or two to help motivate the base? Absolutely, and that is what is so maddening about Dems' continued insistence on running bland, milquetoast Clintonistas in purple states. Their era is over.
Hillary Clinton, a literal Clinton, got just short of 2M. Biden got 2.4 because of his opponent. Otherwise going back to even the first Obama run, the Dems have gotten 1.9-2M on a presidential year. The GOP nearly turned out a presidential vote total. Was Youngkin really that special?Code:As of 9/21/10: As of 9/13/10: College Hockey 6 College Football 0 BTHC 4 WCHA FC: 1
Originally posted by SanTropezMay your paint thinner run dry and the fleas of a thousand camels infest your dead deer.Originally posted by bigblue_dlI don't even know how to classify magic vagina smoke babies..Originally posted by KeplerWhen the giraffes start building radio telescopes they can join too.
Comment
-
Originally posted by SJHovey View Post
I'm not going to claim to be an expert on Virginia politics. I don't live there and I've only visited the state a handful of times. Given the close proximity of the state's population centers to Washington, D.C., it is certainly possible that whatever is happening in the Capitol has more of a "local" impact in Virginia than it would say in Minnesota or Texas or Tennessee or someplace.
For mid-term elections, sure national issues come to the forefront and can be more of a referendum on the party in power, but I do firmly believe that for local and statewide elections, it goes back to the individual candidates and their specific positions on issues of local importance.
Comment
-
Originally posted by SJHovey View Post
Look, a skilled candidate like Walz is not going to get tripped up over CRT. When someone brings it up, you're going to get an answer from him like, "we have a great education system here in Minnesota, and the education of our young people is my highest priority. We've got hardworking men and women, like you folks here, sitting on school boards making the best decision possible for the students in their district, and I support them on that."
A bad candidate, someone who is deeply embedded in politics and political issues on a national level, like McAuliffe, is going to say something like, "I don't think parents should be telling schools what they should teach the children."
That's the difference between winning and losing an election.
McAuliffe is a mediocre candidate but all signs point to the National Dems dragging him down along with Youngkin's fear mongering as reasons he lost. (as psyche said)"It's as if the Drumpf Administration is made up of the worst and unfunny parts of the Cleveland Browns, Washington Generals, and the alien Mon-Stars from Space Jam."
-aparch
"Scenes in "Empire Strikes Back" that take place on the tundra planet Hoth were shot on the present-day site of Ralph Engelstad Arena."
-INCH
Of course I'm a fan of the Vikings. A sick and demented Masochist of a fan, but a fan none the less.
-ScoobyDoo 12/17/2007
Comment
-
Originally posted by FadeToBlack&Gold View PostSo how are Dems supposed to get out in front of the RWNJ media's ridiculous fearmongering and smear campaigns about CRT, trans people, vaccines, defund the police, etc.?Facebook: bcowles920 Instagram: missthundercat01
"One word frees us from the weight and pain of this life. That word is love."- Socrates
Patreon for exclusive writing content
Adventures With Amber Marie
Comment
Comment