unofan,
I am reading a couple of articles about this and this quote stuck out:
Now to me that seems a bit twisted. Would a Grand Jury go against the recommendations of the prosecutor if they are saying it was justified? I know they can do that but I can't imagine that happens very often especially in the case where it is an officer involved shooting.
I am reading a couple of articles about this and this quote stuck out:
"If they wanted to make an assessment about different charges, they could've done that. But our recommendation was that Mattingly and Cosgrove were justified in their acts and their conduct,"
Comment