Biden v Dump 1: If not now, when? If not us, who?

[WeAreNDHockey]

Re: Biden v Dump 1: If not now, when? If not us, who?

And me. Solves a sh-t ton of problems for him (race, women, liberal cred) and the only people who won't like it are people who will already be against us.

She would be my choice. Actually other than the experience factor (which I think is important but in the right person hardly disqualifying) she has the potential to be one of the great presidents in our history if given a chance.

But a former colleague of mine -- a woman who successfully enlightened me on some of my own issues where race/ethnicity was concerned -- says Abrams might be seen as too "ethnic" for some shall we say less open minded democratic-leaning voters. While not a litmus test or requirement to join with democrats like it is with republicans, let us remember a good number of people who might vote for the right people have some pretty wrong beliefs about people of color.

I'm torn because I both desperately want Biden to win, but I also want America to start looking at some actual leaders who would take care of the 99%, first, second and last. Abrams checks every box for me that is important to check.

[Kepler]

Re: Biden v Dump 1: If not now, when? If not us, who?

It will get ugly...but yeah she is the best candidate at this point.

I think he'll pick Harris. Establishment, connected, money. Basically he'll pick her for all the reasons he should not.

Too bad too because she would be a kick as-s AG.

[ScoobyDoo]

Re: Biden v Dump 1: If not now, when? If not us, who?

I think he'll pick Harris. Establishment, connected, money. Basically he'll pick her for all the reasons he should not.

Too bad too because she would be a kick as-s AG.

So will Klobuchar.

[bronconick]

Re: Biden v Dump 1: If not now, when? If not us, who?

The only minor complaint would be her highest position of authority was State House minority leader and she'd be a heartbeat behind a 77 year old man to the Presidency

[mookie1995]

The only minor complaint would be her highest position of authority was State House minority leader and she'd be a heartbeat behind a 77 year old man to the Presidency

Minor? This would scare the living chit outta people.

[ScoobyDoo]

Re: Biden v Dump 1: If not now, when? If not us, who?

Minor? This would scare the living chit outta people.

Oh, really. You mean the same idiots that voted for ****nuts?

[mookie1995]

Oh, really. You mean the same idiots that voted for ****nuts?

Scooby doesn’t need to motivate them. They ain’t voting for joe and abrams.

Concentrate, please

[WeAreNDHockey]

Re: Biden v Dump 1: If not now, when? If not us, who?

Oh, really. You mean the same idiots that voted for ****nuts?

Yet another example of how the right and republicans are nothing but hypocrites. Sure, Abrams lacks experience, but trump lacked any relevant experience to govern a nation. If it disqualifies Abrams (or anyone) it most clearly disqualified trump. A ticket of Buttigieg and Abrams would lack a lot of the relevant experience people say a presidential ticket is supposed to have, but on their worst days, both of them being drunk or sick with coronavirus, a Buttiegieg and Abrams administration would have blown trump and Pence out of the water on their BEST days.

[dxmnkd316]

Re: Biden v Dump 1: If not now, when? If not us, who?

This is really, really funny

https://www.facebook.com/7606381190/...867216191/?d=n

[mookie1995]

Yet another example of how the right and republicans are nothing but hypocrites. Sure, Abrams lacks experience, but trump lacked any relevant experience to govern a nation. If it disqualifies Abrams (or anyone) it most clearly disqualified trump. A ticket of Buttigieg and Abrams would lack a lot of the relevant experience people say a presidential ticket is supposed to have, but on their worst days, both of them being drunk or sick with coronavirus, a Buttiegieg and Abrams administration would have blown trump and Pence out of the water on their BEST days.

Her being there with an experienced pol would work.

People are also being scared of joe with his “issues”.

Heck, mookie would be ok with abrams on top of the ticket

Unfortunately many out there aren’t as wise as mookie

[FadeToBlack&Gold]

Re: Biden v Dump 1: If not now, when? If not us, who?

But a former colleague of mine -- a woman who successfully enlightened me on some of my own issues where race/ethnicity was concerned -- says Abrams might be seen as too "ethnic" for some shall we say less open minded democratic-leaning voters. While not a litmus test or requirement to join with democrats like it is with republicans, let us remember a good number of people who might vote for the right people have some pretty wrong beliefs about people of color.

They said the same sh*t about Obama. It worked out just fine.

[Handyman]

Re: Biden v Dump 1: If not now, when? If not us, who?

To counter the argument...we would look like hypocrites because we ripped Palin for the same thing.*

*Abrams is 100 times the Veep candidate Palin is but we are talking optics not context.

[Kepler]

Re: Biden v Dump 1: If not now, when? If not us, who?

Minor? This would scare the living chit outta people.

You don't get to say this stuff anymore after Dump.

Elections have consequences. Your party elected a toddler. That line of rhetoric is closed to Republicans forever.

[ScoobyDoo]

Re: Biden v Dump 1: If not now, when? If not us, who?

To counter the argument...we would look like hypocrites because we ripped Palin for the same thing.*

*Abrams is 100 times the Veep candidate Palin is but we are talking optics not context.

Yeah, but now that ****wad is President the narrative doesn't fly for either party.

[Kepler]

Re: Biden v Dump 1: If not now, when? If not us, who?

Yeah, but now that ****wad is President the narrative doesn't fly for either party.

Qualifications, character, experience, intelligence, and patriotism have all been eliminated as criteria.

All that remains is having a dong.